Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Intellectual Disability

  • Mark Burton
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_154

Introduction

Intellectual disability (formerly known by a number of pejorative terms, most notably mental retardation) is a condition that has been closely tied to the very evolution of psychology in the context of social policy. The psychology of intellectual disability has reflected the various approaches to psychology, including critical approaches, and their associated social theories.

Definition

Intellectual disability has been defined as “a condition of arrested or incomplete development of the mind, which is especially characterized by impairment of skills manifested during the developmental period, skills which contribute to the overall level of intelligence, i.e., cognitive, language, motor, and social abilities” (World Health Organization [WHO], 2010) or “a disability characterized by significant limitations both in intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior, which covers many everyday social and practical skills…[originating] before the age of 18” (American...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AIDD. (2010). Intellectual disability: definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Burton, M. (1983). Understanding mental health services: Theory and practice. Critical Social Policy, 3(7), 54–74.Google Scholar
  3. Burton, M. (1997). Introduction. In E. Cocks et al. (Eds.), A social history of intellectual disability in Western Australia. Perth, Australia: Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
  4. Race, D. (1999). Hearts and minds: Social role. Valorization, UK academia and services for people with a learning disability. Disability and Society, 14(1), 519–538.Google Scholar
  5. Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex: Society, politics and society in England, 1869–1939. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. WHO. (2010). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en#/F70-F79
  7. Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, ON, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  8. Wolfensberger, W. (1992). A brief introduction to social role valorization as a high-order concept for structuring human services (2nd ed.). Syracuse, NY: Training Institute for Human Service Planning, Leadership and Change Agentry, Syracuse University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Health and Social ChangeManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK