Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Female Genital Cutting

  • Virginia Braun
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_107

Introduction

Female genital cutting is a material, psychological, cultural, and political practice. As a practice, it has resulted in vociferous, often fraught, and sometimes bitter, debates. The question of how to make sense of, and respond to, female genital cutting (FGC) has divided scholars, activists, practitioners, and communities.

Definition

The boundaries around definition of female genital cutting are to some extent arbitrary and complex. The term FGC is typically used to refer to a very diverse range of so-called traditional practices, in which female genitalia are cut, scraped, pricked, stitched, and/or otherwise altered in some way; these practices have also been referred to as female circumcision or female genital mutilation (FGM) and are typically practiced in non-western countries, primarily in certain African countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) produced what is the most widely used designation of different “types” of FGC, depending on location of the tissue...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 378. (2007). Vaginal “rejuvenation” and cosmetic vaginal procedures. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110(3), 737–738.Google Scholar
  2. Berer, M. (2010). Labia reduction for non-therapeutic reasons vs. female genital mutilation: Contradictions in law and practice in Britain. Reproductive Health Matters, 18(35), 106–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun, V. (2009). “The women are doing it for themselves”: The rhetoric of choice and agency around female genital ‘cosmetic surgery’. Australian Feminist Studies, 24(60), 233–249.Google Scholar
  4. Braun, V. (2010). Female genital cosmetic surgery: A critical review of current knowledge and contemporary debates. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(7), 1393–1407. doi:10.1089/jwh.2009.1728.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun, V. (2012). Female genital cutting around the globe: A matter of reproductive justice? In J. C. Chrisler (Ed.), Reproductive justice: A global concern (pp. 29–55). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  6. Cosmetic Labiaplasty: The great ethical debate (2007, March 26). Berman Sexual Health. Retrieved 5 February 2008, from http://www.bermansexualhealth.com/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=99
  7. Johnsdotter, S., & Essén, B. (2010). Genitals and ethnicity: The politics of genital modifications. Reproductive Health Matters, 18(35), 29–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Liao, L.-M., Michala, L., & Creighton, S. M. (2010). Labial surgery for well women: A review of the literature. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 117(1), 20–25. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02426.x.Google Scholar
  9. Monkman, K., Miles, R., & Easton, P. (2007). The transformatory potential of a village empowerment program: The Tostan replication in Mali. Womens Studies International Forum, 30(6), 451–464. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2007.09.005.Google Scholar
  10. Njambi, W. N. (2004). Dualisms and female bodies in representations of African female circumcision: A feminist critique. Feminist Theory, 5(3), 281–303. doi:10.1177/1464700104040811.Google Scholar
  11. OHCHR, UNAINDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA,... WHO. (2008). Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  12. Rahman, A., & Toubia, N. (2000). Female genital mutilation: A guide to laws and policies worldwide. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  13. Serour, G. I., & Faúndes, A. (2006). Female genital cutting: FIGO committee for the ethical aspects of human reproduction and women’s health and FIGO committee on women’s sexual and reproductive rights. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 94(2), 176–177.Google Scholar
  14. Sullivan, N. (2007). “The price to pay for our common good”: Genital modification and the somatechnologies of cultural (in)difference. Social Semiotics, 17, 395–409.Google Scholar
  15. The Donors Working Group on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. (2008). Toward the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C). The donors working group on female genital mutilation/cutting. Retrieved from http://www.fgm-cdonor.org/publications/dwg_platform_action.pdf
  16. Tiefer, L. (2008). Female genital cosmetic surgery: Freakish or inevitable? Analysis from medical marketing, bioethics, and feminist theory. Feminism & Psychology, 18(4), 466–479. doi:10.1177/0959353508095529.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe University of AucklandAucklandAotearoa/New Zealand