Skip to main content
  • 215 Accesses

Introduction

Experience is perhaps the most disputed concept in this encyclopedia. At first sight, it might seem obvious that the word “experience” names the thing-to-be-explained by psychology. If the “what” of chemistry is chemicals and the what of geology is rocks and fossils, then the what of psychology must be experience, mustn’t it? Not at all. History shows that the repudiation of experience as the discipline’s defining object has been an effective launchpad both for experimental/scientific psychology andfor a powerful section of today’s critical psychologies. However, over recent years, such repudiations have had to front an increasing counterflow from the popular culture of self-disclosure in which personal experience is the principal coin – witness the rise of identity politics, reality TV, talk shows and vox pop, social media and blogging, exposés, travelogues and confessional (auto)biographies, the self-help movement, psychotherapy, and interviewing as a technique for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bradley, B. S. (2005). Psychology and experience. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B. S. (2009). Rethinking ‘experience’ in professional practice: Lessons from clinical psychology. In W. C. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 65–82). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B. S. (2011). Darwin’s sublime: The contest between reason and imagination in On the Origin of Species. Journal of the History of Biology, 44, 205–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J., & Ferraris, M. (2001). I have a taste for secret. In A taste for the secret (pp. 1–92). (G. Donis, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvberg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1991). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.) (2nd. Rev. ed.). New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, R. (1983). Sacred cows and white elephants. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 36, 273–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1903). The varieties of religious experience. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1904). Does consciousness exist? In Essays in radical empiricism. New York: Longmans Green (1912; 1–38).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (1994). The spoken word: Listening to a different voice. Celia Kitzinger interviews Carol Gilligan. Feminism & Psychology, 4, 408–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R. D. (1967). The politics of experience and the bird of paradise. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. G. (1992). There is more to our history of giving: The place of introductory textbooks in American psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natorp, P. (1888). Einleitung in die psychologie nach kritischer methode. Tübingen, Germany: J.C.B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17, 773–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (1997). Somatic experience: Foundation or reconstruction? In Practising philosophy: Pragmatism and the philosophical life (pp. 157–177). New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, N., & Papadopoulos, D. (2006). Analysing everyday experience: Social research and political change. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1957). On the contribution of direct child observation to psychoanalysis. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (1965; pp.109–114). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

Online Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Bradley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bradley, B. (2014). Experience. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_104

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_104

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics