Skip to main content

Merger and Acquisition: Definitions, Motives, and Market Responses

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Finance

Abstract

Along with globalization, merger and acquisition has become not only a method of external corporate growth, but also a strategic choice of the firm enabling further strengthening of core competence. The mega-mergers in the last decades have also brought about structural changes in some industries, and attracted international attention. A number of motivations for merger and acquisition are proposed in the literature, mostly drawn directly from finance theory but with some inconsistencies. Interestingly, distressed firms are found to be predators and the market reaction to these is not always predictable. Several financing options are associated with takeover activity and are generally specific to the acquiring firm. Given the interest in the academic and business literature, merger and acquisition will continue to be an interesting but challenging strategy in the search for expanding corporate influence and profitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 679.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal, A. and Walkling, R.A. (1994). ‘Executive Careers and Compensation Surrounding Takeover Bids’, Journal of Finance, 49(3): 985–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., Jaffe, J., and Mandelker, G.N. (1992). “The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: a re-examination of an anomaly.” Journal of Finance, 47(4): 1605–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albo, W.P. and Henderson, R.A. (1987). Mergers and Acquisitions of Privately-held Businesses, Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, E.I. (1971). Corporate Bankruptcy in America. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, J.S. and Chua, J.H. (1981). “Corporate bankruptcy and job losses among top level managers.” Financial Management, 10(5): 70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asquith, P., Gertner, R., and Scharfstein, D. (1994). “Anatomy of financial distress: an examination of junk bond issuers.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3): 625–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. (1980). “Interfirm Tender Offers and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Business, 53(4): 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M., Desai, A., and Kim, E.H. (1983). “The rationale behind interfirm tender offers: information or synergy.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11(4): 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R.A., Myers, S.C., and Marcus, A.J. (2001). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.T., James, C.M., and Mooradian, R.M. (1993). “The information content of distressed restructurings involving public and private debt claims.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1): 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.T., James, C.M., and Mooradian, R.M. (1994). “Asset sales by financially distressed firms.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 1(2): 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. (1986). “Types of synergy and economic value: the impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms.” Strategic Management Journal, 7(2): 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T.E. and Weston, J.F. (1988). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, 3rd edn. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, P. and Ruback, R. (1977). “Tender offers and stockholder returns: an empirical analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5(3): 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, P. (1980). “Merger proposals, management discretion and stockholder wealth.” Journal of Financial Economics, 8: 105–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, G. (1961). Corporate Debt Capacity: A Study of Corporate Debt Policy and the Determination of Corporate Debt Capacity. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, F.H. (1984). “Two agency-cost explanations of dividends.” American Economic Review, 74(4): 650–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M. (1980). “Takeovers, shareholder returns, and the theory of the firm.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(2): 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, M.J. (1989). “Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium of exchange in Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 44(1): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1986). “A ‘signal-jamming’ theory of predation.” RAND Journal of Economics, 17(3): 366–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P.A. (1993). “Determinants of corporate restructuring: the relative importance of corporate governance, takeover threat, and free cash flow.” Strategic Management Journal, 14(special issue): 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, S.C. (1989). “Management turnover and financial distress.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25(2): 241–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, S.C. and Vetsuypens, M.R. (1993). “CEO compensation in financially distressed firms: an empirical analysis.” Journal of Finance, 48(2): 425–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, S.C., John, K., and Lang, L.H.P. (1990). “Troubled debt restructurings: an empirical study of private reorganisation of firms in default.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2): 315–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A.W. and Meeks, G. (1982). “Diversification by Merger.” Economica, 49(196): 447–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. (1997). “An examination of the long run performance of uk acquiring firms.” Journal of Business Finance, 24(7 and 8): 971–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, P. (1983). “Corporate acquisitions: a theory of special cases? a review of event studies applied to acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 38(2): 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J.J. (1989). Financial Decision Making: Concepts, Problems, and Cases, 4th edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J.E. (1986). “Limit pricing when the potential entrant is uncertain of its cost function.” Econometrica, 54(2): 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E. and Clarke, R. (1980). Concentration in British Industry 1935–75. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, D. and Titman, S. (1990). “Share tendering strategies and the success of hostile takeover bids.” Journal of Political Economics, 98(2): 295–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. (1986). “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers.” American Economic Review, 76(2): 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976). “Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency cost and ownership structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and Ruback, R.S. (1983). “The market for corporate control: the scientific evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4): 593–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, K., Lang, L.H.P., and Netter, J. (1992). “The voluntary restructuring of large firms in response to performance decline.” Journal of Finance, 47(3): 891–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. and McConnell, J. (1977). “Corporate mergers and co-insurance of corporate debt.” Journal of Finance, 32(2): 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langetieg, T.C. (1978). “An application of a three-factor performance index to measure stockholder gains from merger.” Journal of Financial Economics, 6: 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, R. and North, D.J. (1978). “Regional aspects of acquisition activity in british manufacturing industry.” Regional Studies, 12(2): 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, W.G. (1971). “A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger.” Journal of Finance, 26(2): 521–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, W.G. (1972). “Finance subsidiaries and corporate borrowing capacity.” Financial Management, 1(1): 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. and Piesse, J. (2004). “Financial risk assessment in takeover and the change of bidder shareholders’ wealth.” International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 4(4): 332–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malatesta, P.H. (1983). “The wealth effect of merger activity and the objective functions of merging firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11: 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, H.G. (1965). “Mergers and the market for corporate control.” Journal of Political Economy, 73(2): 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCardle, K.F. and Viswanathan, S. (1994). “The direct entry versus takeover decision and stock price performance around takeovers.” Journal of Business, 67(1): 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1982). “Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: An equilibrium analysis.” Econometrica, 50(2): 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organisation and Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M.L. and Lehn, K. (1990). “Do bad bidders become good targets?” Journal of Political Economy, 98(2): 372–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H. (1958). “The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment.” American Economic Review, 48(3): 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H. (1963). “Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital.” American Economic Review, 53(3): 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S.C. (1968). “Procedures for capital budgeting under uncertainty.” Industrial Management Review, 9(3): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S.C. (1984). “The capital structure puzzle.” Journal of Finance, 39(3): 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastena, V. and Ruland, W. (1986). “The merger bankruptcy alternative.” Accounting Review, 61(2): 288–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peel, M.J. and Wilson, N. (1989). “The liquidation/merger alternative: some results for the UK corporate sector.” Managerial and Decision Economics, 10(3): 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, B. (1990). Financial Analysis. London: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R.J. and Shane, P.B. (1990). “Acquisition accounting method and bid premia for target firms.” The Accounting Review, 65(1): 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1986). “The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers.” Journal of Business, 59(2): 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.A. (1977). “The determination of financial structure: the incentive signalling approach.” Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1): 23–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R.W., and Jaffe, J.F. (2002). Corporate Finance, 6th edn, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozeff, M. (1982). “Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios.” Journal of Financial Research, 5: 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1970). Economics, 8th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schall, L.D. (1971). “Firm financial structure and investment.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 6(3): 925–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schall, L.D. (1972). “Asset valuation, firm investment, and firm diversification.” Journal of Business, 45(1): 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seth, A. (1990). “Value creation in acquisitions: a re-examination of performance issues.” Strategic Management Journal, 11: 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrieves, R. and Stevens, D. (1979). “Bankruptcy avoidance as a motive for merger.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 14(3): 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (1971). Take-overs: Their Relevance to the Stock Market and the Theory of the Firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M.H. and Walking, R.A. (2000). “Abnormal returns to rivals of acquisition targets: a test of ‘Acquisition Probability Hypothesis’.” Journal of Financial Economics, 55: 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallworthy, E.A. and Kharbanda, O.P. (1988). Takeovers, Acquisitions and Mergers: Strategies for Rescuing Companies in Distress. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1972). “Some aspects of the pure theory of corporate finance: bankruptcies and takeover.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3(2): 458–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M.J., Jensen, M.R.H., and Hudson, C.D. (1994). “The role of medium of exchange in merger offers: examination of terminated merger proposal.” Financial Management, 23(3): 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehranian, H. Travlos, N., and Waegelein, J. (1987) “The effect of long-term performance plans on corporate sell-off induced abnormal returns.” Journal of Finance, 42(4): 933–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travlos, N.G. (1987). “Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment, and bidding firms’ stock returns.” Journal of Finance, 42(4): 943–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utton, M.A. (1982). The Political Economy of Big Business. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne, J.C. (1986). Financial Management and Policy, 7th edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I.E. (1992). Buying A Company in Trouble: A Practical Guide. Hants: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, J.F. and Brigham, E.F. (1990). Essentials of Managerial Finance, 9th edn. London: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank many friends in University of London (U.K.) and National Chi Nan University (Taiwan) for valuable comments. We also want to thank our research assistant Chiumei Huang for preparing the manuscript and proofreading several drafts of the manuscript. Last, but not least, special thanks go to the Executive Editorial Board of the Encyclopedia in Finance in Springer, who expertly managed the development process and superbly turned our final manuscript into a finished product.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Few Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Piesse, J., Lee, CF., Lin, L., Kuo, HC. (2013). Merger and Acquisition: Definitions, Motives, and Market Responses. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5360-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5360-4_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5359-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5360-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics