Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Substructuring Concepts and Component Mode Synthesis

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Experimental Structural Dynamics

  • 1415 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the basic principle of model reduction for linear models in structural dynamics is explained. In particular, the principle of substructuring is outlined following different common approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen MS, Rixen D, van der Seijs M, Tiso P, Abrahamsson T, Mayes TL (2020) Substructuring in engineering dynamics. In: CISM international centre for mechanical sciences. Vol 594. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antoulas AC (2005) Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Aoyama Y, Yagawa G (2001) Component mode synthesis for large-scale structural eigenanalysis. Comput Struct 79(6):605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balmès E (1996) Use of generalized interface degrees of freedom in component mode synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 14th international modal analysis conference, 1

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balmès E (1997) Modèles expérimentaux complets et modèles analytiques réduits en dynamiquedes structures. PhD thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, ONERA, Directions des Structure, DRET/AC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bampton MCC, Craig JRR (1968) Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA J 6(7):1313–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bathe KJ, Dong J (2014) Component mode synthesis with subspace iterations for controlled accuracy of frequency and mode shape solutions. Comput Struct 139:28–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benfield W, Hruda R (1971) Vibration analysis of structures by component mode substitution. AIAA J 9(7):1255–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Castanier MP, Tan YC, Pierre C (2001) Characteristic constraint modes for component mode synthesis. AIAA J 39(6):1182–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Craig RR, Chang CJ (1977) On the use of attachment modes in substructure coupling for dynamics analysis. In: 18st structures, structural dynamics and material conference. AIAA/ASME, San Diego, pp 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  11. Craig RR Jr, Chang CJ (1977) Substructure coupling for dynamic analysis and testing. Report, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dickens JM, Stroeve A (2000) Modal truncation vectors for reduced dynamic substructure models. In: 41st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  13. Géradin M, Rixen D (2015) Mechanical vibrations. Theory and application to structural dynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gruber FM, Rixen DJ (2016) Evaluation of substructure reduction techniques with fixed and free interfaces. Stroj Vestn–J Mech E 62(7–8):452–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gruber F, Rixen D (2018) A comparison of Craig-Bampton approaches for systems with arbitrary viscous damping in dynamic substructuring. In: IMAC-XXXVI: international modal analysis conference, Orlando. Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gruber FM, Rixen DJ (2018) Dual Craig-Bampton component mode synthesis method for model order reduction of nonclassically damped linear systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 111:678–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gruber FM, Gille M, Rixen DJ (2019) A strategy to stabilize the transient analysis and increase the approximation accuracy of dual Craig-Bampton reduced systems. Finite Elem Anal Des 160:32–45

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Guyan R (1965) Reduction of mass and stiffness matrices. AIAA J 3(2):380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Herting D (1985) A general purpose, multi-stage, component modal synthesis method. Finite Elem Anal Des 1(2):153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holzwarth P, Eberhard P (2015) SVD-based improvements for component mode synthesis in elastic multibody systems. Eur J Mech A Solids 49:408–418

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong SK, Epureanu BI, Castanier MP (2013) Next-generation parametric reduced-order models. Mech Syst Signal Process 37(1–2):403–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hurty WC (1965) Dynamic analysis of structural systems using component modes. AIAA J 3(4):678–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Irons B (1965) Structural eigenvalue problems – elimination of unwanted variables. AIAA J 3(5):961–962

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jakobsson H, Bengzon F, Larson MG (2011) Adaptive component mode synthesis in linear elasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 86:829–844

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim JH, Kim J, Lee PS (2017) Improving the accuracy of the dual Craig-Bampton method. Comput Struct 191:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Klerk DD, Rixen DJ, Voormeeren SN (2008) General framework for dynamic substructuring: history, review and classification of techniques. AIAA J 46(5):1169–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krattiger D, Wu L, Zacharczuk M, Buck M, Kuether RJ, Allen MS, Tiso P, Brake MRW (2019) Interface reduction for Hurty/Craig-Bampton substructured models: review and improvement. Mech Syst Signal Process 114:579–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuether RJ, Allen MS, Hollkamp JJ (2017) Modal substructuring of geometrically nonlinear finite element models with interface reduction. AIAA J 55(5):1695–1706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. MacNeal RH (1971) Special issue on structural dynamics: a hybrid method of component mode synthesis. Comput Struct 1(4):581–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Martinez D, Carne T, Gregory D, Miller A (1984) Combined experimental/analytical modelling using component mode synthesis. In: 25th structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, pp 140–152

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rixen D (2002) High order static correction modes for component mode synthesis. In: Fifth world Congress on computational mechanics, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rixen D (2004) A dual Craig-Bampton method for dynamic substructuring. J Comput Appl Math 168(1–2):383–391

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Rixen DJ (2009) Dual Craig-Bampton with enrichment to avoid spurious modes. In: IMACXXVII: international modal analysis conference, Orlando. Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rixen DJ (2011) Interface reduction in the dual Craig-Bampton method based on dual interface modes. In: IMAC-XXIX: international modal analysis conference, Jacksonville. Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rubin S (1975) Improved component-mode representation for structural dynamic analysis. AIAA J 13(8):995–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shyu WH, Ma ZD, Hulbert GM (1997) A new component mode synthesis method: quasi-static mode compensation. Finite Elem Anal Des 24(4):197–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stoev J, Möhring J (2010) Hybrid reduction of non-symmetric mimo systems. In: Paul Sas et al. (ed) ISMA. KU Leuven, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  38. Su TJ, Craig R (1991) Model reduction and control of flexible structures using Krylov vectors. J Guid Control Dyn 14(2):260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Voormeeren S (2012) Dynamic substructuring methodologies for integrated dynamic analysis of wind turbines. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  40. Voormeeren SN, van der Valk PLC, Rixen DJ (2011) Generalized methodology for assembly and reduction of component models for dynamic substructuring. AIAA J 49:1010–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Voormeeren S, Nortier B, Rixen D (2013) Error estimation and adaptive model reduction applied to offshore wind turbine modeling. In: IMAC-XXXI: international modal analysis conference, error estimation and adaptive model reduction applied to offshore wind turbine modeling. Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany

    Daniel Rixen

Authors
  1. Daniel Rixen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Rixen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Randall Allemang

  2. Structural Dynamics and Acoustic Systems Laboratory, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA

    Peter Avitabile

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Society for Experimental Mechanics

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rixen, D. (2022). Substructuring Concepts and Component Mode Synthesis. In: Allemang, R., Avitabile, P. (eds) Handbook of Experimental Structural Dynamics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4547-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation