Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

2013 Edition
| Editors: Elias G. Carayannis

Gender and Innovation

  • Malin LindbergEmail author
  • Helene Schiffbaenker
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_454

Synonyms

 Creativity;  Men;  Norms;  Women

Introduction

This entry describes, defines, synthesizes, and reviews the topic of gender and innovation, which is an emerging field of research evoked by the need for more inclusive innovation policies, innovation networks, and innovation processes.

Over the last two decades, innovation has become an increasingly common subject of political action and scientific studies in Europe and worldwide. This interest emanates from the widespread understanding that development and dissemination of innovations transforms the economy to become more dynamic and knowledge-based. This vision permeates OECDs innovation strategy as well as the new European Union strategy Europe 2020 and its flagship initiative Innovation Union. Simultaneously, the need for more inclusive and creative policies, processes, and networks of innovation has been articulated by gender scientists and gender equality officials (Schiebinger 2008; Fürst Hörte 2009; Danilda and Granat...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andersson S, Amundsotter E, Svensson M, Däldehög A-S. Middle managers as change agents – action oriented gender research. Hudiksvall: Fiber Optic Valley; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Blake MK, Hanson S. Rethinking innovation: context and gender. Environ Plan A. 2005;37:681–701.Google Scholar
  3. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a transdisciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev. 2010;1(1):41–69.Google Scholar
  4. Danilda I, Granat Thorslund J, editors. Innovation and gender. Stockholm: Vinnova; 2011. VI 2011:03.Google Scholar
  5. Ekman M, Gustavsen B, Asheim BT, Pålshaugen O, editors. Learning regional innovation – Scandinavian models. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Foss L, Henry C. Gender and innovation: exploring the hegemonic voice. Paper presented at the conference gender, work and organisation in Keele, UK, 21–23 June 2010Google Scholar
  7. Fürst Hörte G. Behovet av genusperspektiv – om innovation, hållbar tillväxt och jämställdhet: utvärdering (The need for a gender perspective – on innovation, sustainable growth and gender equality). Stockholm: Vinnova; 2009. VR 2009:16.Google Scholar
  8. Ghaye T, Gunnarsson E. Creating cultures of appreciation: organisational innovation through employee well-being. In: Döös M, Wilhelmson L, editors. Organising work for innovation and growth. Stockholm: Vinnova; 2009.Google Scholar
  9. Gunnarsson E, Andersson S, Vänja Rosell A, Lehto A, Salminen-Karlsson M, editors. Where have all the structures gone? Doing gender in organisations, examples from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Stockholm: Stockholm University; 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Gustavsen B. Innovation, participation and ‘constructivist society’. In: Ekman M, Gustavsen B, Asheim BT, Pålshaugen O, editors. Learning regional innovation – scandinavian models. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.Google Scholar
  11. Hacker S. Pleasure, power and technology. London: Unwin Hyman; 1989.Google Scholar
  12. Hirdman Y. The gender system. Theoretical reflections on the social subordination of women. English series. Report no. 40 (1990)Google Scholar
  13. Kvande E. Doing gender in organisations – theoretical possibilities and limitations. In: Gunnarsson E et al., editors. Where have all the structures gone? Doing gender in organisations, examples from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Stockholm: Stockholm University; 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Kvidal T, Ljunggren E. Implementing’a gender perspective’ in an innovation program: more innovation or ambivalence and uncertainty?. Paper presented at the conference gender, work and organisation in Keele, UK, 21–23 June 2010.Google Scholar
  15. Lindberg M. Genusgränser i Sveriges innovationspolitik – en fråga om prioritering (Gender borders in Sweden’s innovation policy – a matter of priority). In: Freidenvall L, Rönnbäck J, editors. Bortom Rösträtten (beyond universal suffrage). Södertörn: Södertörns högskola; 2011.Google Scholar
  16. Lindberg M. Samverkansnätverk för innovation – en interaktiv och genusvetenskaplig utmaning av innovationspolitik och innovationsforskning (Joint action for innovation – a participative and gender scientific challenge of innovation policy and innovation research). Doctoral thesis. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology; 2010Google Scholar
  17. Lindberg M, Danilda I, Torstensson BM. Women Resource Centres – creative knowledge environments of quadruple helix. J Knowl Econ. 2012;3(1):36–52.Google Scholar
  18. Nählinder J. Innovation and employment in services: the case of knowledge intensive business services in Sweden. Doctoral thesis. Linköping: Linköping University, 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Nählinder J. Where are all the female innovators? Nurses as innovators in a public sector innovation project. J Technol Manag Innov. 2010;5(1):13–29.Google Scholar
  20. Nyberg A-C. Making ideas matter – gender, technology and women’s invention. Doctoral thesis. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2009Google Scholar
  21. Papouschek U, Schiffbänker H, Reidl S. Zur Gestaltung des Verhältnisses von Erwerbsarbeit und Privatleben in den Creative Industries. Oesterreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 2006;4:80–93.Google Scholar
  22. Pettersson K. Men and male as the norm? A gender perspective on innovation policies in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Stockholm: Nordregio; 2007.Google Scholar
  23. Pettersson K, Saarinen Y. Entreprenörer, motorer och andra hjältar – manlig norm i svensk klusterpolitik (Entrepreneurs, motors and other heroes – male norm in Swedish cluster policy). Nordisk Samhällsgeografisk Tidskrift. 2005;(39):44–68.Google Scholar
  24. Ranga M, Etzkowitz H. Athena in the world of techne: the gender dimension of technology, innovation and entrepreneurship. J Technol Manag Innov. 2010;5(1):1–12.Google Scholar
  25. Rees T. The learning region? Integrating gender equality into regional economic development. Policy Politics. 2000;28(2):179–91.Google Scholar
  26. Rees T. Reflections on the uneven development of gender mainstreaming in Europe. Int Fem J Politics. 2005;7(4):555–74.Google Scholar
  27. Schiebinger L, editor. Gendered innovations in science and engineering. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  28. Schiebinger L, Schraudner M. Interdisciplinary approaches to achieving gendered innovations in science, medicine, and engineering. Interdiscip Sci Rev. 2011;36(2):154–67.Google Scholar
  29. Schiffbänker H. Karrieren in der industriellen Forschung: zwischen subjektiven Orientierungen und institutionellen Barrieren (Careers in industrial research: between subjective orientations and institutional barriers), Doctoral thesis. Vienna 2011.Google Scholar
  30. Schiffbänker H. Kreative Karrieren: (Fast) alles ist möglich, nix ist fix. In: Eichmann H, Schiffbänker H, editors. Nachhaltige Arbeit in der Wiener Kreativwirtschaft. Vienna: LIT 2008. p. 95–116.Google Scholar
  31. Schraudner M. Gender and innovation: Fraunhofer’s “discover gender” research findings. In: Spitzley A, Ohlhausen P, Spath D, editors. The innovation potential of diversity – practical examples for the innovation management. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung ISI; 2010. p. 169–82.Google Scholar
  32. Squires J. Is mainstreaming transformative? Theorizing mainstream in the context of diversity and deliberation. Soc Politics. 2005;12(3):366–88.Google Scholar
  33. True J, Mintrom M. Transnational networks and policy diffusion: the case of gender mainstreaming. Int Stud Q. 2001;45(1):27–57.Google Scholar
  34. Walby S. Gender mainstreaming: productive tensions in theory and practice. Soc Politics. 2005;12(3):321–43.Google Scholar
  35. West C, Zimmermann DH. Doing gender. Gend Soc. 1987;1:125–51.Google Scholar
  36. Wetterer A. Ausschließende Einschließung – marginalisierende Integration. Geschlechterkonstruktionen in Professionalisierungsprozessen. In: Neusel A, Wetterer A, editors. Vielfältige Verschiedenheiten. Geschlechterverhältnisse in Studium, Hochschule und Beruf. New York: Frankfurt a. M.; 1999. p. 223–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social SciencesLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden
  2. 2.JOANNEUM RESEARCHViennaAustria