Skip to main content

Mode 1, Mode 2, and Innovation

  • Reference work entry

Introduction

It is too easily forgotten that it is only since World War II, that science – in the form of basic research – was taken up by the universities, transforming them into the major players in the forward march of science that they are today. In the beginning, it was through the persuasive efforts of Vannevar Bush and others that government in America and elsewhere decided to back universities as the prime sites for the research that would underpin technological innovation (Bush 1945, Etzkowitz and Leyersdorff 2000). As a result, universities and their research and training functions gradually moved to the foreground as the key institutions to supply the knowledge and manpower to drive economic progress. However, the establishment of research in universities took science in a specific direction, that is, down a route that would lead to the development of the academic disciplines and the administrative and financial structures to support it. The disciplinary structure of...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boettinger S, Bennet AB. Bayh-Dole: if we knew then what we know now. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:320–3.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bush V. Science the endless frontier. Washington, DC: Office of Scientific Research and Development; 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple 638 Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation sys-tem. Int J Technol Manag. 2009;46(3/4):201–30.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW, Vanhaverbeke W, West J. Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole JR. The rise of the Great American Universities. New York: Public Affairs; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalitz R, Holmen M, Scott-Kemmis D, How innovation systems interact: evidence from seven Australian sectors. Camb J Econ forthcoming 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res Policy. 1982;11:147–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy. 2000;29:109–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Galison P. Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. London: Polity Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Gibbons .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gibbons, M. (2013). Mode 1, Mode 2, and Innovation. In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_451

Download citation