Skip to main content

Synonyms

Cross-disciplinarity; Multidisciplinarity

Introduction

From the beginning the discourse on interdisciplinarity (ID) was “a discourse on innovation in knowledge production” (Weingart 2000: 30). Its basic objective has been to make science and higher education more responsive to the complexity of life-world problems and more relevant for the public good and the legitimate needs of the society. The criticism leveled in the name of ID against the disciplinary organization of the traditional universities was summarized under the oft-cited catchphrase “Communities have problems, universities departments” (CERI 1982: 127).

The term interdisciplinarity or interdisciplinary research (ID) can be defined in two distinct but intersecting ways: interdisciplinarity means either the collaboration of researchers trained in different fields of knowledge or the integration of different concepts, methods, and data from two or more different disciplines, no matter if this interdisciplinary...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott A. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago/London: University of Chicago; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold M. Disziplin und Initiation. Die kulturellen Praktiken der Wissenschaft. In: Arnold M, Fischer R, editors. Disziplinierungen. Kulturen der Wissenschaft im Vergleich. Wien: Turia & Kant; 2004. p. 18–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold M. Interdisziplinarität: theorie und praxis eines forschungskonzepts. In: Arnold M, editor. iff – Interdisziplinäre Wissenschaft im Wandel. Wien-Münster: Peter Lang; 2009. p. 65–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold M, Dressel G. iff – Geschichte einer interdisziplinären Institution. In: Arnold M, editor. iff – Interdisziplinäre Wissenschaft im Wandel. Wien-Münster: Peter Lang; 2009. p. 17–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher T. Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell D. The coming of post-industrial society: a venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel F. History and the social sciences. The Longue Durée. In: Braudel F, editor. On history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980. p. 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs A, et al., editors. Interdisciplinarity. Problems of teaching and research in Universities. Paris: OECD; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun H, Hukkinen J, Huutoniemi K, Klein JT. Promoting interdisciplinary research: the case of the Academy of Finland. Helsinki: Publications of the Academy of Finland; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. New York/London: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • CERI. The university and the community. The problems of changing relationships. Paris: OECD; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins HM, Evans R. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Soc Stud Sci. 2002;32(2):235–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins HM, Evans R. Rethinking expertise. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research et al. Facilitating interdisciplinary research 2005. Washingon, D.C.: National Academies Press: National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Gay P, et al. Doing cultural studies. The story of the Sony Walkman. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy. 2000;29(2):109–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Research Advisory Board. Interdisciplinarity in research. EURAB http://ec.europa.eu/research/eurab/pdf/eurab_04_009_interdisciplinarity_research_final.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2012; 2004.

  • Frodeman R, et al., editors. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinary. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison P. Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzmann S, Scott P, Trow M. The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary Societies. London: Sage; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman ME. Levels of expertise and trading zones: a framework for multidisciplinary collaboration. Soc Stud Sci. 2002;32(5–6):933–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett EJ. Interdisciplinary research initiatives at the U.S. National Science Foundation. In: Weingart P, Stehr N, editors. Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press; 2000. p. 248–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huutoniemi K. Evaluating interdisciplinary research. In: Frodemann R et al., editors. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 309–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT. Crossing boundaries: knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottville/London: University Press of Virginia; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans JJ, editor. Interdisciplinarity and higher education. University Park/London: Pennsylvania State University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krull W, Krull W. Beyond the ivory tower. Some observations on external funding of interdisciplinary research in universities. In: Weingart P, Stehr N, editors. Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press; 2000. p. 260–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont M. How professors think: inside the curious world of academic judgment. Cambridge-London: Harvard University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudel G. Conclave in the tower of Babel: how peers review interdisciplinary research proposals. Research Evaluation. 2006;15(1):57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester RK, Priore MJ. Innovation. The missing dimension. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansilla VB. Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration. Research Evaluation. 2006;15(1):17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthey H. Persönliche Interdisziplinarität in der Wissenschaft. In: Umstätter W, Wessel K-F, editors. Interdisziplinarität – Herausforderungen an die Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler. Bielefeld: Kleine Verlag; 1999. p. 243–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthey H. Institutionalisierung disziplinärer und interdisziplinärer Forschungssituationen. Wissenschaftsforschung Jahrbuch 2010. In: Fischer K, Laitko H, Parthey H, editors. Interdisziplinarität und Institutionalisierung der Wissenschaft. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin; 2011. p. 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J. Main trends in interdisciplinary research. London: G. Allen; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J, et al. The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In: Briggs A, editor. Interdisciplinarity. Problems of teaching and research in universities. Paris: OECD; 1972. p. 127–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh R. Zur Entstehung des modernen Systems wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen – Physik in Deutschland 1740–1890. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt/M; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh R. The sociology of scientific disciplines: on the genesis and stability of the disciplinary structure of modern science. Sci Context. 1992;5:3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh R. The multiple publics of science: inclusion and popularization. Soziale Systeme. 2003;9:210–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner S. What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different. In: Weingart P, Stehr N, editors. Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press; 2000. p. 46–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart P. Interdisciplinarity. A paradoxical discourse. In: Weingart P, Stehr N, editors. Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press; 2000. p. 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Arnold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Arnold, M. (2013). Interdisciplinary Research (Interdisciplinarity). In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_302

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_302

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3857-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3858-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics