Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

2013 Edition
| Editors: Elias G. Carayannis

Clusters, Networks, and Entrepreneurship

  • Marc-Hubert Depret
  • Abdelillah Hamdouch
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_199

Synonyms

Introduction

Innovation processes often depend upon the availability or constitution of a critical mass of knowledge, (multidisciplinary) competences, and (entrepreneurial, managerial, and human) resources that are complex, cumulative, and, for the most, still embryonic or difficult to access. Considerable efforts must be also devoted for the mobilization and training of the manpower, for the acquisition of new knowledge and know-how, and for informing employees about new technologies and services and their market potential. Equally important here is the need for a close coordination among a great number of heterogeneous and geographically dispersed actors. The potential for innovation and the competitive positioning of actors “depend increasingly on their differentiated abilities to collaborate with a wide range of partners – those with key complementary competences and significant...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aharonson BS, Baum JAC, Plunket A. Inventive and uninventive clusters: the case of Canadian biotechnology. Res Policy. 2008;37:1108–31.Google Scholar
  2. Amin A, Cohendet P. Geographies of knowledge formation in firms. Ind Innov. 2005;12:465–86.Google Scholar
  3. Amin A, Thrift N. Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. Int J Urban Reg Res. 1992;16:571–87.Google Scholar
  4. Appold S. Location patterns of US industrial research: mimetic isomorphism and the emergence of geographic charisma. Reg Stud. 2005;39:17–39.Google Scholar
  5. Asheim BT. Temporary organisations and spatial embeddedness of learning and knowledge creation. Geogr Ann. 2002;B84(2):111–24.Google Scholar
  6. Audretsch DB, Stephan P. Company-scientist locational linkages: the case of biotechnology. Am Econ Rev. 1996;86:641–52.Google Scholar
  7. Autant-Bernard C, Billand P, Frachisse D, Massard N. Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaborations choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Pap Reg Sci. 2007;86:495–519.Google Scholar
  8. Baptista R, Swann P. Do firms in clusters innovate more? Res Policy. 1998;27:525–40.Google Scholar
  9. Bathelt H. Cluster Relations in the media industry: exploring the “distanced neighbour” paradox in Leipzig. Reg Stud. 2005;39:105–27.Google Scholar
  10. Bathelt H, Taylor M. Clusters, power and place: inequality and local growth in time-space. Geogr Ann. 2002;B84:93–109.Google Scholar
  11. Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr. 2004;28(1):31–56.Google Scholar
  12. Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS. Don’t go it alone: alliance networks composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strat Manag J. 2000;21(3):267–94.Google Scholar
  13. Bell M, Albu M. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Dev. 1999;27(9):1715–34.Google Scholar
  14. Boschma RA. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud. 2005;39:61–74.Google Scholar
  15. Boschma RA, Frenken K. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. J Econ Geogr. 2006;6:273–302.Google Scholar
  16. Breschi S, Lissoni F. Knowledge spillovers and innovation systems: a critical survey. Indust Corp Change. 2001;10(4):975–1005.Google Scholar
  17. Bresnahan T, Gambardella A, Saxenian A. “Old economy” inputs for “new economy” outcomes: cluster formation in the new silicon valleys. Indust Corp Change. 2004;10(4):835–60.Google Scholar
  18. Camagni R. Global network and local Milieu: towards a theory of economic space. In: Conti S, Malecki EJ, Oinas P, editors. The industrial enterprise and its environment. Aldershot: Avebury; 1995. p. 195–214.Google Scholar
  19. Caplin A, Leahy J. Miracle on sixth avenue: information externalities and search. Econ J. 1998;108:60–74.Google Scholar
  20. Carrincazeaux C, Lung Y, Rallet A. Proximity and localisation of corporate R&D activities. Res Policy. 2001;30:777–89.Google Scholar
  21. Casper S, Murray F. Careers and clusters: analyzing the career network dynamic of biotechnology clusters. J Engin Technol Manag. 2005;22:51–74.Google Scholar
  22. Castilla E, Hwang H, Granovetter E, Granovetter M. Social networks in silicon valley. In: Moon-Lee C, Miller WF, Cong Hancock M, Rowen HS, editors. The silicon valley edge. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2000. p. 218–47.Google Scholar
  23. Champenois C. La co-localisation d’entreprises innovantes comme non-choix: L’exemple de l’industrie allemande des biotechnologies. Géographie Economie Société. 2008;10:61–86.Google Scholar
  24. Coe NM, Hess M, Yeung HWC, Dicken P, Henderson J. “Globalizing” regional development: a global production networks perspective. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2004;29:468–84.Google Scholar
  25. Coenen L, Moodyson J, Asheim BT. Nodes, networks and proximities: on the knowledge dynamics of the medicon valley biotech cluster. Euro Plann Stud. 2004;12:1003–18.Google Scholar
  26. Cooke P. Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation exploring “Globalization 2”: A new model of industry organisation. Res Policy. 2005;34:1128–49.Google Scholar
  27. Depret M-H, Hamdouch A. Clusters, réseaux d’innovation et dynamiques de proximité dans les secteurs high-tech: une revue critique de la littérature récente. Revue d’Economie Industrielle. 2009;128:21–52.Google Scholar
  28. Depret M-H, Hamdouch A. Multiscalar clusters and networks as the foundations of innovation dynamics in the biopharmaceutical industry. Région et Développement. 2011;33–2011:227–68.Google Scholar
  29. Dicken P, Malmberg A. Firms in territories: a relational perspective. Econ Geogr. 2001;77:345–63.Google Scholar
  30. Dicken P, Kelly PF, Olds K, Yeung HW-C. Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analyzing the global economy. Glob Netw. 2001;1:89–112.Google Scholar
  31. Folta TB, Cooper AC, Baik Y-S. Geographic cluster size and firm performance. J Bus Venturing. 2006;21:217–42.Google Scholar
  32. Garretsen H, Martin R. Rethinking (New) economic geography models: taking geography and history more seriously. Spat Econ Anal. 2010;5:127–60.Google Scholar
  33. Gertler MS. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). J Econ Geogr. 2003;3(1):75–99.Google Scholar
  34. Gertler MS, Levitte YM. Local nodes in global networks: the geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Ind Innov. 2005;12:487–507.Google Scholar
  35. Glückler J. Economic geography and the evolution of networks. J Econ Geogr. 2007;7(5):619–34.Google Scholar
  36. Gordon IR, McCann P. Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Stud. 2000;37:513–32.Google Scholar
  37. Grabher G. Trading routes, bypasses and risky intersections: mapping the travels of “networks” between economic sociology and economic geography. Prog Hum Geogr. 2006;30:163–89.Google Scholar
  38. Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol. 1985;91(3):481–510.Google Scholar
  39. Grotz R, Braun B. Territorial or trans-national networking: spatial aspects of technology-oriented Co-operation within the German mechanical engineering industry. Reg Stud. 1997;31(6):545–57.Google Scholar
  40. Hamdouch A. Start-up biotechnologiques et dynamique des clusters et réseaux d’innovation dans la biopharmacie: une revue de la littérature empirique. Journal des Entreprises Familiales. 2008;1(3):8–43.Google Scholar
  41. Hamdouch A. Conceptualizing innovation clusters and networks. In: Laperche B, Sommers P, Uzunidis D, editors. Innovation clusters and networks. Brussels: Peter Lang; 2010.Google Scholar
  42. Hamdouch A, Moulaert F. Knowledge infrastructure, innovation dynamics and knowledge creation/diffusion/accumulation processes: a comparative institutional perspective. Innov Euro J Soc Sci Res. 2006;19:25–50.Google Scholar
  43. Hamdouch A, d’Ovidio M. Expected and unexpected creative cities. Is there an “Alchemy” of territorial creative dynamics? ESDP conference, Aveiro, 21–22 June; 2009.Google Scholar
  44. Hamdouch A, Depret M-H. Surveying the literature on territorial innovation systems: a suggested interpretation framework. SSRN Working Papers Series, 22 p; 2009.Google Scholar
  45. Hussler C, Rondé P. Les réseaux d’innovation des chercheurs universitaires sont-ils géographiquement circonscrits ? Revue d’Economie Industrielle. 2005;109:69–90.Google Scholar
  46. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R. Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart J Econ. 1993;108:577–98.Google Scholar
  47. Jong S. How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the Birth of the biotech industry. Indust Corp Change. 2006;15:251–83.Google Scholar
  48. Kaiser R, Prange H. The reconfiguration of national innovation systems: the example of German biotechnology. Res Policy. 2004;33:95–408.Google Scholar
  49. Lagendijk A. Beyond the regional lifeworld against the global systemworld: towards a relational-scalar perspective on spatial-economic development. Geogr Ann. 2002;B84(2):77–92.Google Scholar
  50. Markusen A. Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. Econ Geogr. 1996;72:293–313.Google Scholar
  51. Moodysson J, Coenen L, Asheim BT. Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the medicon valley life science cluster. Environ Plann. 2008;A40:1040–56.Google Scholar
  52. Moulaert F, Mehmood A. Analysing regional development and policy: a structural-realist approach. Reg Stud. 2010;44:103–18.Google Scholar
  53. Moulaert F, Sekia F. Territorial innovation models: a critical survey. Reg Stud. 2003;37:289–302.Google Scholar
  54. Nachum L, Keeble D. Neo-marshallian clusters and global networks: the linkages of media firms in central London. Long Range Plann. 2003;36:459–80.Google Scholar
  55. Niosi J, Zhegu M. Aerospace clusters: local or global knowledge spillovers? Ind Innov. 2005;12(1):5–29.Google Scholar
  56. Nooteboom B. Learning by interaction: absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. J Manage Govern. 2000;4(1–2):69–92.Google Scholar
  57. Oinas P. Activity-specificity in organizational learning: implications for analyzing the role of proximity. GeoJournal. 1999;49:363–72.Google Scholar
  58. Orsenigo L. The (Failed) development of a biotechnology cluster: the case of Lombardy. Small Bus Econ. 2001;17:77–92.Google Scholar
  59. Owen-Smith J, Powell WW. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ Sci. 2004;15:5–21.Google Scholar
  60. Phlippen S, van der Knaap B. When clusters become networks. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, TI 2007-100/3 (2007).Google Scholar
  61. Porter ME. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv Bus Rev. 1998;76:77–90.Google Scholar
  62. Powell WW, Koput KW, Bowie JI, Smith-Doerr L. The spatial clustering of science capital: accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships. Reg Stud. 2002;36:291–305.Google Scholar
  63. Prevezer M. Ingredients in the early development of the U.S. biotechnology industry. Small Bus Econ. 2001;17:17–29.Google Scholar
  64. Saxenian A, Li W. Bay-to-Bay strategic alliances: network linkages between Taiwan and U.S. venture capital industries. Int J Technol Manag. 2003;25:136–50.Google Scholar
  65. Stuart TE. Governing strategic alliances. In: Buskens V, Raun W, Snidjers C, editors. Research in the sociology of organizations. 20th ed. Greenwich: JAI Press; 2003. p. 189–208.Google Scholar
  66. Suarez-Villa S, Walrod W. Operational strategy, R&D and Intra-metropolitan clustering in a polycentric structure: the advanced electronics industries of Los Angeles. Urban Studies. 1997;34:1343–80.Google Scholar
  67. Ter Wal ALJ, Boschma RA. Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. Ann Reg Sci. 2009;43:739–56.Google Scholar
  68. Torre A. Clusters et systèmes locaux d’innovation: retour critique sur les hypothèses naturalistes de transmission des connaissances à l’aide des catégories de l’économie de la proximité. Région et Développement. 2006;24:15–44.Google Scholar
  69. Trippl M, Tödtling F. Developing biotechnology clusters in non-high technology regions: the case of Austria. Ind Innov. 2007;14:47–67.Google Scholar
  70. Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm network: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q. 1997;42:35–67.Google Scholar
  71. Waxell A, Malmberg A. What is global and what is local in knowledge-generating interaction? The case of the biotech cluster in Uppsala, Sweden. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev. 2007;19:137–59.Google Scholar
  72. Wever E, Stam E. Clusters of high technology SMEs: the Dutch case. Reg Stud. 1999;33(4):391–400.Google Scholar
  73. Wolfe D, Gertler MS. Clusters from the inside and out: local dynamics and global linkages. Urban Stud. 2004;41:1071–93.Google Scholar
  74. Zucker LG, Darby MR. Virtuous circles in science and commerce. Pap Reg Sci. 2007;86:445–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Poitiers, IRIAF, CRIEFNiortFrance
  2. 2.Planning DepartmentPolytechnic School, University of ToursToursFrance