Skip to main content

Synonyms

Creative process; Creative thinking; Innovative thinking; Innovativeness; Invention

Introduction

Innovation is again the buzzword du jour (Kanter 2006). As such, many well-meaning practitioners use the words creative process, creativity, and innovation interchangeably, which sews the seeds of confusion and does not help the field flourish. There is a need for rigor in language, a need to be clear about what it is that people lead, research, seek, teach, and facilitate. As practitioners and researchers march down the path of making the study of creative thinking, creativity, and innovation more deliberate, repeatable, useful, and accepted, mixing words that have different meanings creates confusion which makes it more difficult to fully understand the topic at hand. When one presents research on “innovation,” when they really mean a “creative process,” it jeopardizes the acceptance of both by causing furrowed brows and making it easier to raise objections that derail the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff R, Vergara E. Creativity in problem solving and planning: a review. Eur J Operat Res. 1981;7:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altshuller G. And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Worcester: Technical Innovation Center; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM. Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;39:1154–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron F. The disposition toward originality. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1955;51:478–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila T, Epstein MJ, Shelton R. Making innovation work: how to manage it, measure it, and profit from it. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono E. Six thinking hats. Boston: Little, Brown; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestien RL. Leading on the creative edge: gaining competitive advantage through the power of Creative Problem Solving. Colorado Springs: Pinon; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon WJJ. On being explicit about creative process. J Creat Behav. 1972;6(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP. Creativity. Am Psychol. 1950;5:444–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter EM. Innovation: the classic traps. Harv Bus Rev. 2006;2006:73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman G. The content and logical structure of creativity concepts: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of creativity research. In: Isaksen SG, Murdock MC, Firestien RL, Treffinger DJ, editors. Understanding and recognizing creativity: the emergence of a discipline. Norwood: Ablex; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon DW. In search of human effectiveness. Buffalo: Creative Education Foundation; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock MC. Designing and conducting qualitative research using creative analysis. Paper presented at the Eastern Education Research Association’s Annual Conference and Qualitative Special Interest Group, Sarasota, FL, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn AF. Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative problem solving. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnes SJ. Visionizing. Buffalo: Creative Education Foundation; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince GM. The operational mechanism of synectics. J Creat Behav. 1968;2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puccio GJ, Murdock MC, Mance M. Creative leadership: skills that drive change. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes M. An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan. 1961;4:305–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards T. Innovation and creativity: woods, trees and pathways. R&D Manag. 1991;21(2):97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards T. The management of innovation: recasting the role of creativity. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1996;5(1):13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EB. Managing invention and innovation. Res Technol Manag. 1988;31:11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R. Innovation alignment to maximize market penetration. Paper presented at the Innovation Network’s Immersion 360 Conference, Scottsdale, AZ. 2007. Available at: http://www.modelbenders.com/papers/RSmith_InnovationImmersion.pdf

  • Stein MI. Stimulating creativity. New York: Academic; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Vehar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Vehar, J. (2013). Creativity and Innovation: What Is the Difference?. In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3857-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3858-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics