Advertisement

Taste

  • Linda M. Bartoshuk
  • Derek J. Snyder
Reference work entry

Abstract

Rozin coined the phrase “the omnivore’s dilemma” to encapsulate what an omnivore must do to survive: avoid toxins and take in nutritious food. This chapter is organized to show what is known about how taste contributes to this biological imperative. We begin with the anatomy and physiology of taste and show how nature uses chemosensory pleasure (liking for beneficial substances and disliking for dangerous ones) to promote survival. One of the most important distinctions for this area is between hard-wired and learned affect. Historically, belief in hard-wired affect has often given way to understanding how learning accomplished what seemed to be hard-wired.

Keywords

Artificial Sweetener Taste Quality Glossopharyngeal Nerve Burning Mouth Syndrome Basic Taste 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Further Reading

  1. Bartoshuk LM (1993) The biological basis of food perception and acceptance. Food Qual Prefer 4:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Fast K, Green BG, Prutkin JM, Snyder DJ (2002) Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons. What we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Qual Prefer 14:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartoshuk LM, Snyder DJ, Grushka M, Berger AM, Duffy VB, Kveton JF (2005) Taste damage: previously unsuspected consequences. Chem Senses 30(Suppl 1):i218–i219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauchamp GK (2009) Sensory and receptor responses to umami: an overview of pioneering work. Am J Clin Nutr 90(suppl):723S–727SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behrens M, Meyerhof W (2010) Oral and extraoral bitter taste receptors. Sens Metabol Control Energy Balance 52:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaudhari N, Roper SD (2010) The cell biology of taste. J Cell Biol 190:285–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeSimone JA, Lyall V, Heck GL, Feldman GM (2001) Acid detection by taste receptor cells. Respir Physiol 129:231–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doty RL (2010) The great pheromone myth. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  9. Duffy VB, Lanier SA, Hutchins HL, Pescatello LS, Johnson MK, Bartoshuk LM (2007) Food preference as a screen for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk within health risk appraisal. J Am Diet Assoc 107:237–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goff SA, Klee HJ (2006) Plant volatile compounds: sensory cues for health and nutritional value? Science 311:815–819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meyerhof W, Batram C, Kuhn C, Brockhoff A, Chudoba E, Bufe B, Appendino G, Behrens M (2010) The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem Senses 35:157–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ming D, Ninomiya Y, Margolskee RF (1999) Blocking taste receptor activation of gustducin inhibits gustatory responses to bitter compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9903–9908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pfaffmann C (1960) The pleasures of sensation. Psychol Rev 67:253–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prutkin JM, Duffy VB, Etter L, Fast K, Gardner E, Lucchina LA, Fisher EM, Snyder DJ, Tie K, Weiffenbach J, Bartoshuk LM (2000) Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men. Physiol Behav 69:161–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rolls BJ (1986) Sensory-specific satiety. Nutr Rev 44:93–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosenstein D, Oster H (1988) Differential facial responses to four basic tastes in newborns. Child Dev 59:1555–1568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rozin P (1976) The selection of foods by rats, humans, and other animals. In: Rosenblatt JS, Hinde RA, Shaw E, Beer C (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, vol 6. Academic, New York, pp 21–76Google Scholar
  18. Sclafani A (2001) Psychobiology of food preferences. Int J Obes 25(Suppl):S13–S16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shepherd GM (2005) Outline of a theory of olfactory processing and its relevance to humans. Chem Senses 30(Suppl 1):i3–i5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Snyder DJ, Bartoshuk LM (2008) The logic of sensory and hedonic comparisons: are the obese different? In: Blass EM (ed) Obesity: causes, mehanisms, prevention and treatment. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  21. Snyder DJ, Fast K, Bartoshuk LM (2004) Valid comparisons of suprathreshold stimuli. J Conscious Stud 11:40–57Google Scholar
  22. Swithers SE, Martin AA, Davidson TL (2010) High-intensity sweeteners and energy balance. Physiol Behav 100(1):55–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Temussi PA (2009) Sweet, bitter and umami receptors: a complex relationship. Trends Biochem Sci 34(6):296–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Whitehead M, Kachele D (1994) Development of fungiform papillae, taste buds, and their innervation in the hamster. J Comp Neurol 340:515–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Community Dentistry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations