Handbook of Manufacturing Engineering and Technology pp 2525-2549 | Cite as
Rapid Tooling in Manufacturing
Rapid tooling (RT) refers to the rapid production of parts that function as a tool (primarily mold tools such as mold inserts) as opposed to being a prototype or a functional part. These tools are produced by different additive manufacturing (AM), also previously known as rapid prototyping (RP) processes such as stereolithography (SL), fused deposition modeling (FDM), selective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM), 3D printing (3DP), and electron beam melting (EBM). These AM tools are then directly used as molds or used to produce molds for conventional manufacturing, such as vacuum and investment casting.
RT is generally categorized as soft or hard and direct or indirect tooling. The wide range of materials involved in tooling includes wax, wood, photopolymers, thermal polymers, metals (such as tool steels), ceramics (such as alumina and silica), and composites. In soft tooling, the molds produced directly or indirectly are destroyed after a single cast or are used for a small batch production. Single cast typically refers to investment casting where parts produced have properties identical to parts produced from conventional investment casting. Soft tooling for small batch production is typically used more for manufacturing of functional prototypes that meet the minimum properties required for application testing.
In hard tooling, molds produced are usually made of metals, ceramics, or composites that can be used for high volume production. For example, metal molds and silica sand molds can be produced directly with the SLM and SLS technique respectively. Parts manufactured from these molds exhibit high quality, fine finishing, and superior if not comparable to properties of parts manufactured from conventionally produced molds. Molds with high complexity are also possible. Hence, RP displays excellent tooling and manufacturing capabilities with the development of RT.
There are several benefits that are realized by RT with the most evident being cost savings. RT greatly reduces the time needed for mold-forming process and therefore increases the speed of production. This in turn reduces the time to market allowing companies to increase profits. RT also allows the ease of product customization due to its flexibility in tool design, ability to adapt to customers’ specifications, and most importantly, does not require high volume to breakeven. Conceptual designs can be further improved without incurring high costs compared to conventional manufacturing processes. These factors in RT attribute to high performance manufacturing and high quality products.
KeywordsTitanium Furnace Zirconia Chrome Foam
- 3D Systems Cooperation (2011) [cited 2010; 5 May]. http://www.3dsystems.com/company/index.asp
- ASTM International (2009) ASTM Standard F2792-12a. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies 1, p 2 ASTM International 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United StatesGoogle Scholar
- Becker D (2011) Components made from copper powder open up new opportunities. [cited 2012; 23 Oct]. http://idw-online.de/pages/de/news409097
- Becker D, Meiners W, Wissenbach K (2011) Additive manufacturing of components out of copper and copper alloys by selective laser melting. Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology, AachenGoogle Scholar
- Bertrand P, Bayle F, Combe C, Goeuriot P, Smurov I (2007) Ceramic components manufacturing by selective laser sintering. In: Symposium on laser synthesis and processing of advanced materials held at the E-MRS 2007 spring meeting. Elsevier Science Bv, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
- Brown AS (1991) Rapid prototyping – parts without tools. Aerosp Am 29(8):18–23Google Scholar
- Campanelli SL, Contuzzi N, Ludovico AD (2010) Manufacturing of 18 Ni Marage 300 steel samples by selective laser melting. In: Hashmi MSJ, Yilbas BS, Naher S (eds) Advances in materials and processing technologies, Pts 1 and 2. Trans Tech Publications, Stafa-Zurich, pp 850–857Google Scholar
- CONCEPT Laser GmbH (2011) 16 July 2009 [cited 2009; Sept]. http://www.concept-laser.de/
- Dimitrov D, Moammer A, Harms T (2010) Cooling channel configuration in injection moulds. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Direct Digital Manufacturing Laboratory – Georgia Institute of Technology (2010) [cited 2012; 15 Sept]. http://ddm.me.gatech.edu/page8/page8.html
- Garcia MA, Garcia-Pando C, Marto C (2012) Conformal cooling in moulds with special geometry. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Lee CW, Chua CK, Cheah CM, Tan LH, Feng C (2004) Rapid investment casting: direct and indirect approaches via fused deposition modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23(1–2):93–101Google Scholar
- MTT Technologies, Rapid Manufacturing Technologies (2011) [cited 2010; Mar 2010]. http://www.mtt-group.com/
- Phenix Systems (2011) 18 Sep 2009 [cited 2009; 18 Sep 2009]. http://www.phenix-systems.com/phenix_en/home.htm
- Sachs E, Cima M, Cornie J, Brancazio D, Bredt J, Curodeau A, Esterman M, Fan T, Harris C, Kremmin K, Lee SJ, Pruitt B, Williams P, Soc Mfg E (1991) 3-dimensional printing – rapid tooling and prototypes directly from CAD representation Proceedings of the 1991 NSF Design and Manufacturing Systems Conference, Jan. 1991, Austin, Texas, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigan, pp. 569–575Google Scholar
- Wholers T (2000) Rapid prototyping and tooling state of the industry Wohlers Associates Inc. Fort Collins, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- Wohlers T (2003) The rapid prototyping manufacturing industry. Adv Mater Process 161(1):35–37Google Scholar
- Wohlers T (2005) New trends and developments in additive fabrication. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Wohlers TT (2008) State of the industry. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar