Advertisement

Environmentally Friendly Machining

  • Fu ZhaoEmail author
  • Abhay Sharma
Reference work entry

Abstract

Machining is a controlled material removal process and finds its application in a variety of industrial sectors such as automobile, aerospace, and defense. Similar to many other manufacturing processes, machining bears significant environmental impacts in terms of energy/resource consumption, airborne emissions, wastewater discharge, and solid wastes along with occupational health risks. Most of these issues are due to the use of cutting fluids, which are traditionally formulated with petroleum-derived compounds with high ecotoxicity and low biodegradability. Exposure to these chemicals, along with growth of microorganisms and biocides used for microbial control, could lead to respiratory irritation, asthma, pneumonia, dermatitis, and even cancer. To address these concerns, extensive effort has been put forth to (1) extend the cutting fluid life span by removing particulates, free oils, and other contaminants via separation and filtration, (2) reformulate traditional petroleum-based fluids with vegetable oils and bio-based ingredients for lower toxicity and higher biodegradability, and (3) reduce or even eliminate the reliance on cutting fluids during machining through dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) techniques. Apart from these technology developments, machining process parameters can be optimized for reduced environmental impacts, especially energy consumption and carbon footprint. Process optimization approaches require the development of models and equations to correlate process parameters with process inputs and outputs. Given the current status in the field, opportunities exist in designing new bio-based, microfiltration-compatible formulations using industrial by-products, optimizing minimum MQL system configuration, advancing cutting tool insert materials and lubricants for MQL, and developing high-energy efficiency machine tools.

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment Machine Tool Machine Process Tool Life Carbon Footprint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abdalla HS, Patel S (2006) The performance and oxidation stability of sustainable metalworking fluid derived from vegetable extracts. Proc IME B J Eng Manuf 220(B12):2027–2040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An QL, Fu YC, Xu J (2011) Experimental study on turning of TC9 titanium alloy with cold water mist jet cooling International. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(6):549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astakhov VP (2008) Ecological machining: near-dry machining. In: Davim JP (ed) Machining fundamentals and recent advances, 1st edn. Springer, London, pp 195–224Google Scholar
  4. Bierma TJ, Waterstraat FL (2004) Total cost of ownership for metalworking fluids, Report RR105, Illinois Waste Management and Research CenterGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt RH (2006) Filtration systems for metalworking fluids. In: Byers JP (ed) Metalworking fluids, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 231–252Google Scholar
  6. Burke JM, Gaines WA (2006) Waste treatment. In: Byers JP (ed) Metalworking fluids, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 301–324Google Scholar
  7. Byrne G, Dornfeld D, Denkena B (2003) Advancing cutting technology. Annu CIRP 52(2):483–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarens AF, Hayes KF, Skerlos SJ (2006) Feasibility of metalworking fluids delivered in supercritical carbon dioxide. J Manuf Proc 8(1):47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarens AF, Zimmerman JB, Keoleian GA, Hayes KF, Skerlos SJ (2008) Comparison of life cycle emissions and energy consumption for environmentally adapted metalworking fluid systems. Environ Sci Technol 42(22):8534–8540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devillez A, Le Coz G, Dominiak S, Dudzinski D (2011) Dry machining of Inconel 718, workpiece surface integrity. J Mater Process Technol 211(10):1590–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glenn T, Van AF (2004) Opportunities and market trend in metalworking fluids. J Soc Tribol Lubr Eng 54(8):31–34Google Scholar
  12. Grigoriev SN, Vereschaka AA, Vereschaka AS, Kutin AA (2012) Cutting tools made of layered composite ceramics with nano-scale multilayered coatings. In: Proceedings of 5th CIRP conference on high performance cutting, Zurich, Switzerland. vol 1, pp 301–306Google Scholar
  13. Grsesik W (2008) Advanced machining process of metallic materials. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Gutowski TC, Murphy C, Allen D, Bauer D, Bras B, Piwonka T, Sheng P, Sutherland J, Thurston D, Wolff E (2005) Environmentally benign manufacturing: observations from Japan, Europe and the United States. J Clean Prod 13(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haapala KR, Zhao F, Camelio J, Sutherland JW, Skerlos SJ, Dornfeld DA, Jawahir IS, Clarens AF, Rickli JL (2013) A review of engineering research in sustainable manufacturing. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng MSEC2011–50300:599–619. doi:10.1115/MSEC2011-50300Google Scholar
  16. Hong SY, Ding Y (2001) Cooling approaches and cutting temperatures in cryogenic machining of Ti–6Al–4 V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1417–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong SY, Ding Y, Ekkens RG (1999) Improving low carbon steel chip breakability by cryogenic chip cooling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:1065–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iowa Waste Reduction Center (1996) Cutting fluid management for small machining operations: a practical pollution prevention guide. University of Northern Iowa, Cedar FallsGoogle Scholar
  19. Itoigawa F, Childs THC, Nakamura T, Belluco W (2006) Effects and mechanisms in minimal quantity lubrication machining of an aluminum alloy. Wear 260(3):339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jean MD, Carolina CA, James BD’A (2006) Generation and control of mist from metal removal fluids. In: Byers JP (ed) Metalworking fluids, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 377–398Google Scholar
  21. John KH, William EL, Eugene MW (2006) Health and safety aspects in the use of metalworking fluids. In: Byers JP (ed) Metalworking fluids, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 337–376Google Scholar
  22. Kellens K, Dewulf W, Overcash M, Hauschild MZ, Duflou JR (2012a) Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life-cycle inventory (uplci) – CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing), part 1: methodology description. Int J LCA 17(1):69–78. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0340-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kellens K, Dewulf W, Overcash M, Hauschild M, Duflou J (2012b) Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (uplci) CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing), part 2: case studies. Int J LCA 17(2):242–251. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0352-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klocke F, Eisenblätter G (1997) Dry cutting. Annu CIRP 46(2):519–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Landgraf G (2001) Dry cutting. Cut Tool Eng 56(1):1–5Google Scholar
  26. Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, Nukman Y (2012) Application of vegetable oil-based metalworking fluids in machining ferrous metals-a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 52(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, Nukman Y (2013) A critical assessment of lubrication techniques in machining processes: a case for minimum quantity lubrication using vegetable oil-based lubricant. J Clean Prod 41:210–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marksberry PW, Jawahir IS (2008) A comprehensive tool-wear/tool-life performance model in the evaluation of NDM (near dry machining) for sustainable manufacturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(7–8):878–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mathias CGT (2006) Contact dermatitis and metalworking fluids. In: Byers JP (ed) Metalworking fluids, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 325–336Google Scholar
  30. Rajagopalan NK, Rusk T, Dianovsky M (2004) Purification of semi-synthetic metalworking fluids by microfiltration. Tribol Lubr Technol 60(8):38–44Google Scholar
  31. Rajemi MF, Mativenga PT, Aramcharoen A (2010) Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations. J Clean Prod 18:1059–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanchez JA, Pombo I, Alberdi R, Izquierdo B, Ortega N, Plaza S, Martinez-Toledano J (2010) Machining evaluation of a hybrid MQL-CO2 grinding technology. J Clean Prod 18:1840–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shane Y, Hong YD, Jeong W (2001) Friction and cutting forces in cryogenic machining of Ti–6Al–4 V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(15):2271–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shashidhara YM, Jayaram SR (2010) Vegetable oils as a potential cutting fluid-an evolution. Tribol Int 43(5–6):1073–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skerlos SJ, Zhao F (2003) Economic considerations in the implementation of microfiltration for metalworking fluid biological control. J Manuf Syst 22(3):202–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Su Y, He N, Li L, Iqbal A, Xiao MH, Xu S, Qiu BG (2007) Refrigerated cooling air cutting of difficult-to-cut materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(6):927–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Supekar SD, Clarens AF, Stephenson DA, Skerlos SJ (2012) Performance of supercritical carbon dioxide sprays as coolants and lubricants in representative metalworking operations. J Mater Proc Tech 212(12):2652–2658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sutherland JW, Michalek DJ, Riveria JL (2007) Air quality in manufacturing. In: Kutz M (ed) Environmentally conscious manufacturing. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 145–178Google Scholar
  39. UK Environmental Technology Best Practice Programme (1999) Benchmarking the consumption of metalworking fluids, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. USGS (2013) Mineral commodity summaries: tantalum statistics and information. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/niobium/mcs-2013-tanta.pdf
  41. Weinert K, Inasaki I, Sutherland JW, Wakabayashi T (2004) Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication. Annu CIRP 53(2):511–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Winter M, Bock R, Herrmann C, Stache H, Wichmann H, Bahadir M (2012) Technological evaluation of a novel glycerol based biocide-free metalworking fluid. J Clean Prod 35:176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xiong YH, Lau K, Zhou XY, Schoenung JM (2008) A streamlined life cycle assessment on the fabrication of WC-Co cermets. J Clean Prod 16:1118–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yildiz Y, Nalbant M (2008) A review of cryogenic cooling in machining processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(9):947–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yuan SM, Yan LT, Liu WD, Liu Q (2011) Effects of cooling air temperature on cryogenic machining of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 211(3):356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhao F (2005) Microfiltration recycling of semi-synthetic metalworking fluids: modeling and formulation design. PhD dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhao F, Clarens A, Murphree A, Hayes K, Skerlos SJ (2006) Structural aspects of surfactant selection for the design of vegetable oil semi-synthetic metalworking fluids. Environ Sci Technol 40(24):7930–7937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhao F, Naik G, Cheng G (2010) Environmental assessment of laser-assisted manufacturing: case studies on laser shock peening and laser assisted turning. J Clean Prod 18(13):1311–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology HyderabadYeddumailaramIndia

Personalised recommendations