Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Hockey, Virginia Trimble, Thomas R. Williams, Katherine Bracher, Richard A. Jarrell, Jordan D. MarchéII, JoAnn Palmeri, Daniel W. E. Green

Apollonius of Myndos

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9917-7_9220

BornMyndos (Gümüşlük, Turkey), 140 ± 10 BCE

Died90 ± 10 BCE

Apollonius was the earliest known astronomer to argue that comets were orbiting bodies like the planets (within a geocentric framework). His place of origin is known, but his dates are an estimate, and nothing certain is known of his life.

Apollonius is mentioned by only one extant author, Seneca, in his Natural Questions. In addition to Apollonius’s place of origin, Seneca records that Apollonius studied with the “Chaldeans,” i.e., Babylonian astrologers. Those two facts suggest that Apollonius came after  Hipparchus, consistent with his claim that a comet is a “proper star, just like the sun or moon” (i.e., as exemplary bodies whose motions were believed to be well-understood due to Hipparchus).

If, as some scholars have suggested, Seneca is relying on  Poseidoniusfor his account, then Apollonius precedes Poseidonius. That order is very likely in any case, since Poseidonius’s theory of comets held that they were...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Selected References

  1. Anonymous (1988). Hebrew-English edition of the Babylonian Talmud, ed. I. Epstein and I. W. Slotki, vol. 26/27, Horayoth. London: Soncino Press, §10a.Google Scholar
  2. Goldstein, J. A.(1976). I Maccabees: a new translation, with introduction and commentary. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, §15.22–23.Google Scholar
  3. Josephus. Antiquities of the Jews, vol. 7, ed. R. Marcus (1966). Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, book 13, §9.2 (259–264), book 14, §10.22 (247–255).Google Scholar
  4. H. Kaletsch (2006). “Myndos,” Brill’s New Pauly 9: 410–411.Google Scholar
  5. P. T. Keyser (1994). “On Cometary Theory and Typology from Nechepso-Petosiris through Apuleius to Servius,” Mnemosyne 47:625–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. P. T. Keyser (2008). “Alexander of Mundos.” Encyclopedia of Ancient Natural Scientists, ed. P. T. Keyser and G. L. Irby-Massie, p. 57. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. P. T. Keyser (2009). “Heliocentrism in or out of Heraclides,” in Heraclides of Pontus = Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities 15, ed. W.W. Fortenbaugh & Elizabeth Pender, pp. 205–235. New Brunswick/London: Transaction.Google Scholar
  8. P. T. Keyser (2013). “The Name and Nature of Science: Authorship in Social and Evolutionary Context.” in Writing Science. Medical and Mathematical Authorship in Ancient Greece, ed. Markus Asper. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  9. T. Livius, History of Rome, vols. 9–10, ed. E. T. Sage (1935). Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, book 33, §20.11–12, book 37, §16.2.Google Scholar
  10. L. Annaeus Seneca. Natural Questions: Books IV–VII, vol. 2, ed. T. H. Corcoran (1972). Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, Book 7, §4, 17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA