Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Hockey, Virginia Trimble, Thomas R. Williams, Katherine Bracher, Richard A. Jarrell, Jordan D. MarchéII, JoAnn Palmeri, Daniel W. E. Green

de la Hire, Philippe

Reference work entry

Alternate Name

 Hire, Philippe de la

Born Paris, France, 1640

Died Paris, France, 21 April 1718

Philippe de la Hire was a mathematician, an observational astronomer, and a key figure in the Académie royale des sciences. La Hire was the eldest child of Laurent de la Hire, peintre ordinaire du roiand professor at the Académie royale de peinture, and Marguerite Coquin. Laurent was a well-known artist whose patrons included Cardinal Richelieu. Laurent and his wife were well off financially – they owned several properties in Paris – and their residence was frequented by leading figures from the worlds of the visual arts and the mathematical sciences. The geometer Gérard Desargues was one of Laurent’s closest friends. Laurent intended Philippe also to be a painter, and to that end educated him personally. Philippe’s study of geometry was assisted by Desargues, who probably introduced him to projective geometry. Laurent, who admired the Venetian masters, urged Philippe to go to Venice, which he did in 1660, remaining there for 4 years. He also worked on classical geometry, especially the Conic sectionsof   Apollonius .

After his return, this young man of independent means devoted himself to projective geometry, drawing, and painting. He collaborated with the engraver and geometer Abraham Brosse, who also had worked with Desargues. In 1672 La Hire published his Observations … sur les points d’attouchement de trois lignes droites qui touchent la section d’un cone …. This was followed in 1673 by his Nouvelle méthode en géométrie pour les sections des superficies coniques et cylindriques. The Nouvelle méthodedisplays the influence of Desargues, yet La Hire denied that he knew Desargues’s work on conics before 1672, only encountering it later. It is an early example of La Hire’s propensity to claim that his publications owed little to others.

By the time he published the Nouvelle méthode, La Hire’s personal circumstances had changed. In 1670 he married Cathérine le Sage, who came from a Parisian bourgeois family. They had four children by the time she died in 1681. Later that year he remarried, his second wife being Cathérine Nonnet, the daughter of a notary; four more children were born of this marriage. In 1679 La Hire published his Nouveaux élémens des sections coniques …, and in 1685 his most comprehensive treatise on conic sections, Sectiones conicae in novem libros distributatae.

La Hire had attracted the attention of the Académie des sciences and in 1678 was brought in as an astronomer, despite lack of astronomical experience. It is unclear as to who suggested to J. B. Colbert, protector of the academy, that he be appointed.   Jean Picard may have been involved, for La Hire’s first task was to assist him with surveys for the new atlas of France, which the academy was preparing. In 1679 La Hire accompanied Picard to Brittany and in 1680 to Guyenne. They then split up, La Hire concentrating on Calais and Dunkirk (1681) and Provence (1682). In this latter year Picard died. Philippe inherited his scientific instruments and papers. La Hire and his family also moved into the Paris Observatory, which became their permanent residence.

Astronomy never monopolized La Hire’s attention. In 1683   Jean Cassini began to extend the meridian line that Picard had begun, and he placed La Hire in charge of the project to the north of Paris. From 1684 to 1685 La Hire worked on the scheme to provide a water supply for Versailles. He continued his studies in geometry, and developed interests in optometry, mechanics, and meteorology. La Hire held two teaching posts: In 1682 he was made professor of mathematics at the Collège Royal and in 1687 became professor at the Académie d’Architecture. He accepted editorial duties, seeing through the press works by Picard and Edme Mariotte. La Hire was fascinated by scientific instruments and conducted experiments on clocks, thermometers, and barometers.

La Hire acquired a mastery of the instruments at the observatory – a new quadrant in the plane of the meridian was installed in 1683 – and developed his observational skills. He had received instruction from Picard, but in Cassini, who also resided at the observatory, he had another first-class guide.

La Hire acquired a good grounding in astronomical theory, but concluded that it rested on unsure foundations: The tables with which astronomers worked, including the Rudolfine Tables of   Johannes Kepler , contained so many inaccuracies that even the most sophisticated theory was rendered unsound. The principal challenge facing astronomers was, in La Hire’s opinion, to improve the quality of observation. This required progress on two fronts: superior observational instruments and more accurate clocks, hence his own experiments with clocks and his design, for example, of new types of reticules for observing eclipses.

La Hire concentrated on observing planetary and stellar motions, eclipses of the Sun and Moon, sunspots, planetary conjunctions, and the passage of comets. The more he observed, the more he became convinced that irregularities in the movement of celestial bodies were so frequent that no theory could do more than approximate to physical reality. He published two main sets of astronomical tables: Tabularum astronomicarum …(1687) and the more comprehensive Tabulae astronomicae Ludovici Magni …(1702; reprinted 1727, French translation 1735). The latter appeared just as the War of the Spanish Succession was beginning, and the reference to Louis XIV implied that, just as La Hire’s tables surpassed those of Kepler, so did the King of France outshine the Holy Roman Emperor.

Responses to the Tabularum astronomicarumwere mixed.   John Flamsteed , for one, was disappointed that it referred only to 63 stars, and contained errors in the declination of some stars. However the Tabulae astronomicaeproved more controversial. It contained a preface in which La Hire justified the conduct of observations as the chief duty of the astronomer. He referred to improvements to instruments that personally he had made, and later in the book included passages instructing the reader in observational techniques.   Bernard de Fontenelle , secretary of the academy, included a notice of the Tabulae astronomicaein the Histoire et Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciencesfor 1702.

However, behind this apparently successful publication lay a more discordant reality. Among La Hire’s papers are two statements by Cassini and his assistant   Giovanni Maraldi in which they level certain charges against him. First, he did not submit his manuscript to the academy for approval (an obligation all the more necessary since La Hire associated the observatory with his observations); perhaps he was afraid that, had he done so, substantial corrections might have been proposed. Second, although Cassini and Maraldi worked with him at the observatory, he had neither informed them of his intention to publish the tables, nor consulted them about the contents. Third, he greatly exaggerated his role in refining the instruments at the observatory, while understating the contributions of his colleagues. Fourth, his text implied that all the observations in the Tabulae astronomicaewere his own, whereas many were by others. The formal records of the academy are silent on this dispute, but relations between La Hire and Cassini thereafter were strained.

This was not the only quarrel involving La Hire. In 1694, his son Gabriel-Philippe had joined the academy. Gabriel-Philippe’s first individual publication was the Ephéméridesfor 1701, in which he reproached a fellow academician,   Jean le Fèbvre , for making a serious mistake in an observation made on 15 March 1699. Gabriel-Philippe did not name Le Fèbvre, but everybody knew to whom he referred. Le Fèbvre edited the journal Connaissance des Temps, and in the edition for 1701 accused Gabriel-Philippe and his father – again, neither was named, but their identity was unmistakable – with lies, plagiarism, and the falsification of observational data. The affair blew up in the academy. Le Fèbvre was required publicly to apologize and to reissue the Connaissancewith the offending passage removed. He was spared the public apology, but ceased attending the academy, from which he was expelled in 1702. He also lost the editorship of the Connaissance des Temps.

After the controversies of 1701 and 1702, La Hire concentrated on his observations and other scientific activities, and continued publishing accounts of eclipses, sunspots, and other celestial phenomena. At the time of his death, he was a senior member of the academy, and had seen his younger son, Jean-Nicolas, also become a member (1710). La Hire’s career illustrates the tensions and controversies that could attend the practice of astronomy in the Académie des sciences, and exemplifies the multifarious pursuits in which many scientists engaged in this period.

Selected References

  1. Fontenelle, B. le Bovier de (1766). Eloges des Académiciens de l’Académie Royale des Sciences morts depuis l’An 1699. Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Gillispie, Charles C. (1980). Science and Polity in France at the End of the Old Regime. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. — (2004). Science and Polity in France: The Revolutions and Napoleonic Years. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hahn, Roger (1971). The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Sturdy, David J. (1995). Science and Social Status: The Members of the Académie des Sciences, 1666–1750. Woodbridge, England: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
  6. Taton, René (1953). “La première oeuvre géométrique de Philippe de la Hire.” Revue d’histoire des sciences6: 93–111.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. — (1973). “La Hire, Philippe de.” In Dictionary of Scientific Biography, edited by Charles Coulston Gillispie. Vol. 7, pp. 576–579. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Wolf, C. (1902). Histoire de l’Observatoire de Paris de sa fondation à 1793. Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universtity of UlsterColeraineUK