Skip to main content

Berlin and Kay Theory

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 199 Accesses

Definition

The Berlin-Kay theory of basic color terms maintains that the world’s languages share all or part of a common stock of color concepts and that terms for these concepts evolve in a constrained order.

Basic Color Terms

In 1969 Brent Berlin and Paul Kay advanced a theory of cross-cultural color concepts centered on the notion of a basic color term [1]. A basic color term (BCT) is a color word that is applicable to a wide class of objects (unlike blonde), is monolexemic (unlike light blue), and is reliably used by most native speakers (unlike chartreuse). The languages of modern industrial societies have thousands of color words, but only a very slender stock of basic color terms. English has 11: red, yellow, green, blue, black, white, gray, orange, brown, pink, and purple. Slavic languages have 12, with separate basic terms for light blue and dark blue.

In unwritten and tribal languages the number of BCTs can be substantially smaller, perhaps as few as two or three, with...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Berlin, B., Kay, P.: Basic Color Terms. University of California Press, Berkeley (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casson, R.W.: Color shift: evolution of English color terms from brightness to hue. In: Hardin, C.L., Maffi, L. (eds.) Color Categories in Thought and Language, pp. 224–239. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kay, P., Berlin, B., Maffi, L., Merrifield, W.R., Cook, R.: The World Color Survey. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacLaury, R.: Color and Cognition in Mesoamerica: Constructing Categories as Vantages. University of Texas Press, Austin (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/wcs/data.html

  6. Webster, M.A., Kay, P.: Individual and population differences in focal colors. In: MacLaury, R.L., Parmei, G., Dedrick, D. (eds.) The Anthropology of Color. John Benjamin, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jameson, J., D’Andrade, R.G.: It’s not really red, green, yellow, blue: an inquiry into perceptual color space. In: Hardin, C.L., Maffi, L. (eds.) Color Categories in Thought and Language, pp. 224–239. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kay, P., Regier, T.: Resolving the question of color naming universals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100(15), 9085–9089 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Regier, T., Kay, P., Khetarpal, N.: Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104(4), 1436–1441 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yendrikhovskij, S.N.: A computational model of color categorization. Color Res. Appl. 26, 235–238 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Belpaeme, T., Bleys, J.: The impact of statistical distribution of colours on colour category acquisition. J. Cogn. Sci. 10(1), 1–20 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. L. Hardin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hardin, C.L. (2016). Berlin and Kay Theory. In: Luo, M.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8071-7_62

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics