Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology

2016 Edition
| Editors: Ming Ronnier Luo

CIE Color-Rendering Index

  • János Schanda
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8071-7_2

Definition

Color rendering (of a light source)

effect of an illuminant on the color appearance of objects by conscious or subconscious comparison with their color appearance under a reference illuminant [1, 2]

Color rendering index

measure of the degree to which the psychophysical color of an object illuminated by the test illuminant conforms to that of the same object illuminated by the reference illuminant, suitable allowance having been made for the state of chromatic adaptation

Abbreviation: CRI

CIE 1974 special color rendering index [Ri]

measure of the degree to which the psychophysical color of a CIE test color sample illuminated by the test illuminant conforms to that of the same sample illuminated by the reference illuminant, suitable allowance having been made for the state of chromatic adaptation

CIE 1974 general color rendering index [Ra]

mean of the CIE 1974 special color rendering indices for a specified set of eight test color samples

Overview

The word rendering is used in different meanings in computer graphics, illuminating engineering, color science, etc. In illuminating engineering and colorimetry, it describes how a scene will look under a specified illumination, compared to some sort of reference. The term color rendering is used in a very restricted form; in the CIE definition, it describes what we nowadays call color fidelity of a light source. Light source color rendering encompasses also color preference and color discrimination.

CIE Color Rendering Index

The first CIE color rendering index was based on the dissimilarity of the spectrum of the test and a reference light source [3], performing the comparison in a number of spectral bands. It was soon realized that it is more important to describe the color rendering by the description the test source has on different colored samples, and CIE decided to base the new index on the color difference of the color of test samples illuminated with the test source and a reference illuminant of equal correlated color temperature [4]. CIE published an updated, revised edition of this publication in 1974 [5] and republished it later with minor editorial changes [2].

As presented under definitions, the CIE term color rendering is defined as a color appearance term [1], where the perceived color is compared to a reference illuminant. In practice, the current CIE recommendation uses the CIE 1964 uniform color space as a correlate of color appearance, eight non-saturated plus six saturated Munsell samples as test samples, Planckian radiators and phases of daylight as reference illuminant, and von Kries chromatic adaptation to transform small color differences between test source and reference illuminant chromaticity [6]. The flowchart of the different calculation steps is shown in Fig. 1.
CIE Color-Rendering Index, Fig. 1

Flowchart for determining the color rendering indices

Transformation from color differences (ΔE i ) to special CRI-s (R i ) is by
$$ {R}_i=100-4.6\Delta {E}_i $$
(1)
The average of the eight non-saturated samples provides the general color rendering index:
$$ {R}_a = \frac{1}{8}{\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^8{R}_i} $$
(2)
The 4.6 multiplier was selected to get the traditional warm white halophosphate fluorescent lamp’s R a = 50.

Colorimetry used in the calculation of above CRI was the best correlate for color appearance at the time of its elaboration. Since the 1960s, the description of color appearance progressed considerably; new color appearance models have been developed [7]. During the past 30 years, a large number of papers were published that partly criticized the CIE Test Sample Method and showed some evidence where the method breaks down and how a new method could be developed, but they were not conclusive enough to be able to come up with a better method (see e.g., [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]).

CIE dealt with the question of updating the color rendering index in several technical committees and submitted several internal recommendations [16, 17] but was unable to come up with a recommendation that would have suited all participants. The latest CIE technical committee (TC 1–69) faces similar fate.

Color Fidelity, Preference, and Discrimination

Parallel to the work to update the color rendering test method, several attempts were made to add further color quality descriptors of light sources, such as flattery/color preference index and color discrimination index. Judd coined the term flattery index already in 1967 [18]. The flattery index was intended to describe whether a light source renders colors in a more pleasant (flattery) way than a reference illuminant. Jerome discussed the differences between flattery and rendition in detail [19]. Later, the word preference was used instead of flattery [20]. Thornton’s calculation showed that color rendering and color preference indices do not have their optimum value at the same spectral distribution and discussed the question of color discrimination as well [21], see also [22].

Recently, much interest was raised by increasing the brightness appearance of the illuminated scene, also called apparent or spatial brightness, and investigating how this might correlate with some further descriptors of light source color quality [23, 24, 25, 26, 27].

Recent investigations show that instead of the classical CRI, one would need in the future several indices.

The color fidelity index could be a replacement of the current CIE test method [2]. This new metric [28] tries to update every aspect of the CIE metric: The CIE-UCS is used only to find the corresponding reference illuminant with equal correlated color temperature; in the other colorimetric calculations, the CIE 10° observer is used, as in color rendering one usually sees larger surfaces and the 10° observer is not flawed by the erroneous V(λ) function. It uses two sets of test samples: one artificial set is constructed to prohibit a visually not supported optimization of the test light source spectrum, and a further large set uses both color constant and color inconstant samples [29] to find out which colors will be less reliably rendered. Colorimetric calculations are performed in CIECAM02 space with CAM02-UCS extension that provides an advanced chromatic adaptation transform and good uniformity. Square root averaging gives higher weight to larger color differences in calculating the general color fidelity index, and a sigmoid function between ΔE and R avoids negative indices and adjusts the scale to human perception.

A color preference index might be based on the proposal by Davis and Ohno [15], who recommended in their CIELAB-based formula not to punish sources if they render test samples providing higher chroma and favored hue shift, also allowing for lower numbers if the light source color is extremely reddish or bluish (very low or very high CCT); see also [30].

Further Color Quality Proposals

There are number of further proposals in the literature that emphasize one aspect of color preference or another. A few titles that might lead the reader to further readings are the following:

Rea and Freyssinier argued that a proper description of light source color quality can be achieved by the help of the CRI and gamut area descriptors [31, 32]. Hashimoto and coworkers described preference based on the feeling of contrast [33]. Smet and coworkers based their metric on memory colors [34]. Szabó and coworkers discussed in their paper the question how light source color quality can be described by evaluating the color harmony in the investigated scene [35].

References

  1. 1.
    CIE: International Lighting Vocabulary (ILV) CIE S 017/E (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    CIE: Method of Measuring and Specifying Colour Rendering of Light Sources, 3rd ed. CIE13.3 Vienna (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CIE: Compte Rendu 11th, p. 5. Session, Paris (1948)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    CIE Technical Report: Method of Measuring and Specifying Colour Rendering Properties of Light Sources, 1st ed. Publication CIE 13 (E-1.3.2) Vienna (1965)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    CIE: Publication CIE 13.2 (TC-3.2) Vienna (1974)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schanda, J.: Colour rendering of light sources. In: Colorimetry, Understanding the CIE, System – CIE Colorimetry 1931–2006, pp. 207–217. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luo, M.R., Li, C.: CIE colour appearance models and associated colour spaces. In: Colorimetry, Understanding the CIE, System – CIE Colorimetry 1931–2006, pp. 255–290. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schanda, J.: Possibilities of colour rendering evaluation based on a single reference source. CIE, Spanish Committee, IV Lux Europa, p. 9. Granada (1981)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seim, T.: In search of an improved method for assessing the colour rendering properties of light sources. Light. Res. Technol. 17, 12–22 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pointer, M.R.: Measuring colour rendering – a new approach. Light. Res. Technol. 18, 175–184 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu, H.: Assessing the effectiveness of colour rendering. Light. Res. Technol. 29, 89 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Trigt, C.: Color rendering, a reassessment. Color Res. Appl. 24, 197–206 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schanda, J.: The concept of colour rendering revisited. In: CGIV ‘2002 First European Conference on Color in Graphics Imaging and Vision, pp. 2–5. University of Poitiers, France (2002). 04Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schanda, J., Sándor, N.: Colour rendering, past – present – future. In: International Lighting and Colour Conference. Cape Town, 2–5 Nov 2003Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis, W., Ohno, Y.: Toward an improved color rendering metric. Proc. SPIE 5941, G1–G8 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    CIE Research Note: Colour Rendering, TC 1–33 Closing Remarks. CIE 135 (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    CIE: Colour Rendering of White LED Light Sources. CIE 177 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Judd, D.B.: A flattery index for artificial illuminants. Illum. Eng. 62, 593–598 (1967)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jerome, C.W.: Flattery versus rendition. J. IES 1, 208–211 (1972)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thornton, W.A.: A validation of the color-preference index. J. IES 4, 48–52 (1974)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thornton, W.A.: Color-discrimination index. J. OSA 62, 191–194 (1972)ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schanda, J., Czibula, G.: New description of color discrimination properties of light sources. Acta Chrom. 3(5), 209–211 (1980)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fotios, S.A., Levermore, G.J.: Chromatic effect on apparent brightness in interior spaces 1: introduction and colour gamut models. Light. Res. Technol. 30, 97–102 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fotios, S.A., Levermore, G.J.: Chromatic effect on apparent brightness in interior spaces II: SWS Lumens model. Light. Res. Technol. 30, 107–110 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fotios, S.A.: Lamp colour properties and apparent brightness: a review. Light. Res. Technol. 33, 163–181 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vidovszky-Németh, A., Schanda, J.: White light brightness-luminance relationship. Light. Res. Technol. 44, 17–26 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Royer, M.P., Houser, K.W.: Spatial brightness perception of trichromatic stimuli. Leukos 9, 89–108 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chou, Y. F., Luo, M. R., Schanda, J., Csuti, P., Szabó, F., Sárvári, G.: Recent developments in colour rendering indices and their impacts in viewing graphic printed materials. In: Color and Imaging Conference. San Jose (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luo, M.R., Li, C.J., Hunt, R.W.G., Rigg, B., Smith, K.J.: CMC 2002 colour inconstancy index; CMCCON02. Color. Technol. 119, 280–285 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schanda, J.: Combined colour preference – colour rendering index. Light. Res. Technol. 17, 31–34 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rea, M.S., Freyssinier-Nova, J.P.: Color rendering: a tale of two metrics. Color Res. Appl. 33, 192–202 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rea, M.S., Freyssinier, J.P.: Color rendering: beyond pride and prejudice. Color Res. Appl. 35, 401–409 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hashimoto, K., Yano, T., Shimizu, M., Nayatani, Y.: New method for specifying color-rendering property of light sources based on feeling of contrast. Color Res. Appl. 32, 361–371 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smet, K., Ryckaert, W.R., Pointer, M.R., Deconinck, G., Hanselaer, P.: Colour appearance rating of familiar real objects. Color Res. Appl. 36, 192–200 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Szabó, F., Bodrogi, P., Schanda, J.: Experimental modeling of colour harmony. Color Res. Appl. 35, 34–49 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • János Schanda
    • 1
  1. 1.VeszprémHungary