Encyclopedia of Adolescence

2011 Edition
| Editors: Roger J. R. Levesque

Taxonomies of Delinquents

  • Tim BrennanEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1695-2_206

Overview

This essay describes the roles and importance of taxonomic research in delinquency. It is noted that taxonomic research has been largely neglected and there still is no taxonomy of delinquency that has achieved consensus in this field. However, recent theoretical developments suggest that four broad delinquency categories: psychopathic, sociopathic, neurotic, and normal/normative may offer the beginnings of a taxonomic structure for delinquency. The essay describes the major theorists and their arguments for these categories and reviews recent empirical taxonomic studies that are building support for these broad categories and providing evidence for subtypes within each category. A series of controversies is addressed, particularly the rejection of taxonomies by advocates of general theories of crime.

Significance of Taxonomies of Delinquency

Taxonomies play vital roles in all scientific disciplines, e.g., scientific communication, to develop “analytical categories” and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brennan, T., Breitenbach, M., & Dieterich, W. (2008). Towards an explanatory taxonomy of adolescent delinquents: identifying several social-psychological profiles. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24 (2), 179–203.Google Scholar
  2. Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist. To-ronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  3. Harris, P., Jones, P. R. (1999). Differentiating delinquent youths for program planning and evaluation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 403–434.Google Scholar
  4. Lykken, D. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale: Lawerence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 523–599.Google Scholar
  6. Meehl, P. E. (1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality, 60, 117–174.Google Scholar
  7. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 12–45.Google Scholar
  9. Warren, M. Q. (1971). Classification of offenders as an aid to efficient management and effective treatment. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 62, 239–258.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northpointe InstitutePeachtree CityUSA