Skip to main content

Trial-Spacing Effect in Associative Learning

  • Reference work entry
  • 143 Accesses

Synonyms

Distributed practice; Spaced practice

Definition

Learning is usually more rapid when consecutive learning trials are distributed in time rather than massed in time. This phenomenon, known as the trial-spacing effect, appears to be ubiquitous. It has been demonstrated in a number of different species (including humans, rats, pigeons, fruit flies, and sea slugs [Hermissenda]) and in a number of associative learning tasks (including appetitive and aversive classical conditioning, autoshaping, eyelid conditioning, taste-aversion learning, and categorization).

The trial-spacing effect has been studied particularly extensively in classical conditioningin animals. In this method, animals learn to respond to a conditioned stimulus (CS), such as a tone, that has been repeatedly paired with a biologically significant event (an unconditioned stimulus, or US), such as a foot shock or a food pellet. The trial-spacing effect takes the form of more rapid learning when the CS–US pairings...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   3,400.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   2,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107, 289–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. C. (2000). Trial and intertrial durations in appetitive conditioning in rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, M. T., Woo, N. H., Lattal, K. M., Young, J. Z., Nguyen, P. V., & Abel, T. (2002). Protein synthesis is required for the enhancement of long-term potentiation and long-term memory by spaced training. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 2770–2777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunsay, C., & Bouton, M. E. (2008). Analysis of a trial-spacing effect with relatively long intertrial intervals. Learning & Behavior, 36, 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunsay, C., Stetson, L., & Bouton, M. E. (2004). Memory priming and trial spacing effects in Pavlovian learning. Learning & Behavior, 32, 220–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5–47). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Travis P. Todd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Todd, T.P., Bouton, M.E. (2012). Trial-Spacing Effect in Associative Learning. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_950

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_950

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1428-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics