Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning

2012 Edition
| Editors: Norbert M. Seel

Aptitude-Treatment Interaction

  • Yu-chu YehEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_582



Aptitude-treatment interaction (ATI) research is a research paradigm that attempts to examine how an outcome depends on the match between individuals’ specific aptitude(s) and the treatment they receive. When a treatment and an individual’s aptitude(s) are matched, the effect of the treatment is optimal. While an aptitude refers to any measurable personal characteristic that would have an impact on achieving goals in the designed treatment, a treatment refers to any manipulable situational variable. An interaction occurs when a treatment has an effect on one type of individual and a different effect on another.

Theoretical Background

The Goal of ATI

According to ATI, individuals differ in their readiness to profit from a particular treatment at a particular time, and individuals may adapt their situations to fit their own characteristics. Therefore, ATI offers a framework for interpreting aptitudes as personal readiness to profit...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Ackerman, P. L. (2003). Aptitude complexes and trait complexes. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 85–93.Google Scholar
  2. Astleitner, H., & Koller, M. (2006). An aptitude-treatment-interaction-approach on motivation and student’s self-regulated multimedia-based learning. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 13, 11–23.Google Scholar
  3. Caspi, O., & Bell, I. R. (2004). One size does not fit all: Aptitude x Treatment Interaction (ATI) as a conceptional framework for complementary and alternative medicine outcome research. Part 1 – What is ATI research? Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 10, 580–586.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, D. A. (2005). Learning and cognitive styles in web-based learning: Theory, evidence, and application. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 266–278.Google Scholar
  5. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1969). Final report: Individual differences in learning ability as a function of instructional variables. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  6. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  7. Merz, M. A., & Szymanski, E. M. (1997). Effects of a vocational rehabilitation-based career workshop on commitment to career choice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41, 88–95.Google Scholar
  8. Snow, R. E. (1991). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 205–216.Google Scholar
  9. Yeh, Y. C. (2007). Aptitude-treatment interactions in preservice teachers’ behavior change during computer-simulated teaching. Computers and Education, 48(3), 495–507.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Teacher Education, Research Center for Mind, Brain and Learning, Center for Creativity and Innovation StudiesNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan