Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning

2012 Edition
| Editors: Norbert M. Seel

Impaired Multidimensional Motor Sequence Learning

  • Michael Borich
  • Lara Boyd
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1752

Synonyms

Definition

Inability to learn a dimension of movement with practice in response to specific task demands during a motor task requiring serial, patterned movement. The three primary dimensions are: (1) motor (movement command), (2) spatial (movement in space), and (3) temporal (timing of a movement).

Theoretical Background

Learning motor skills involves integrating many elements of a movement in an environment in order to successfully perform the desired response consistently over time. Most “real-life” skills involve sequential movements to complete a task. In a controlled laboratory setting, these elements are usually tested in isolation making it difficult to deduce which elements are most salient to acquisition of a given skill. Every movement dimension (motor, spatial, and temporal) requires a certain level of precision for successful skill production. For example,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Boyd, L. A., & Winstein, C. J. (2001). Implicit motor-sequence learning in humans following unilateral stroke: The impact of practice and explicit knowledge. Neuroscience Letters, 298(1), 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd, L. A., Vidoni, E. D., & Siengsukon, C. F. (2008). Multidimensional motor sequence learning is impaired in older but not younger or middle-aged adults. Physical Therapy, 88(3), 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Curran, T. (1997). Effects of aging on implicit sequence learning: Accounting for sequence structure and explicit knowledge. Psychological Research, 60(1–2), 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frensch, P. A. (1994). Composition during serial learning: A serial position effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(2), 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada