Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning

2012 Edition
| Editors: Norbert M. Seel

Integrated, Multidisciplinary, and Technology-Enhanced Science Education

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1704



Integrated, multidisciplinary, and technology-enhanced science education (Dinov 2008) refers to a holistic science educational approach where motivation, data, theories, techniques, tools, and results from various disciplines are collectively utilized to enhance the pedagogical efforts and improve the learning processes of knowledge acquisition and retention. Multidisciplinary refers to the broad spectrum of scientific fields that are collectively employed to provide heterogeneous training experiences for learners. Technology-enhanced implies that the latest information, communication, and computational technologies are directly embedded in the curricular training. Integrated signifies that this educational approach incorporates modern pedagogical strategies with available...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Brint, M., Marcey, D., et al. (2009). What are the long term implications of integration/interdisciplinary science on traditional disciplines and their professional associations (Turf wars)? Integrated science (pp. 69–76). US: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Dinov, I. (2008). Integrated multidisciplinary and technology-enhanced science education: The next frontier. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 84–93.Google Scholar
  3. Klein, J. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University.Google Scholar
  4. Koslow, S., & Huerta, M. (1997). Neuroinformatics: An overview of the human brain project. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Roberts, J. (2006). Isolation to interface to integration – is it feasible to seek a holistic profession? Methods of Information in Medicine, 45(5), 471–473.Google Scholar
  6. Stokols, D., Hall, K., et al. (2008). The science of team science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S77–S89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCLA StatisticsUniversity of California Los Angeles, SOCR ResourceLos AngelesUSA