Skip to main content
  • 433 Accesses

Synonyms

Conceptual maps; Knowledge maps

Definition

Concepts can be defined as objects, events, situations, or properties that possess common critical attributes and are represented by icons or symbols, such as key words (Ausubel 2000). Concept maps are external network structures that allow two-dimensional, spatial processing along preconstructed or to-be-constructed connecting lines. In its simplest form, a concept map would consist out of two concepts and a linking word for example “cats – are → mammals.” Although originally conceptualized as hierarchical structures (Novak and Gowin 1984), current conceptualizations use a broader scope that is the basis for the following definition: Concept maps provide an external network-like representation of knowledge structures. They consist of spatially grouped nodes with key words representing concepts, connecting lines representing the semantic connection of concepts, and labels on the lines specifying the kind of semantic relation. Careful...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 3,400.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 2,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2010). Prior knowledge activation: how different concept mapping tasks lead to substantial differences in cognitive processes, learning outcomes, and perceived self-efficacy. Instructional Science, 38, 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klix, F. (1980). On structure and function of semantic memory. In F. Klix & J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Cognition and memory (pp. 11–25). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Gurlitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gurlitt, J. (2012). Concept Maps. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_158

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_158

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1428-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics