Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning

2012 Edition
| Editors: Norbert M. Seel

Incentives and Student Learning

  • Wayne A. Grove
  • Lester Hadsell
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_156



Generally, incentives for learning can be defined as an inducement or supplemental reward that serves as a motivational device for intended learning. What kinds of incentives, especially financial, improve student learning? This question is salient worldwide, but particularly in the USA where, despite being the richest of the 41 OECD countries, US students’ math, science, and reading abilities rank them in the middle and below that of the OECD countries (Fryer 2010, p. 3). The American student high school graduation rate of about 70% is low compared to OECD countries, with students in urban areas faring much worse (Education at a Glance 2007). Within the USA, a stark Hispanic/black-white learning gap persists, with rates of underperformance roughly twice as high for minorities as for whites. Colleges, universities, and employers report that too many high school graduates do not possess the basic skills...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Abdulkadiroglu, A., Angrist, J., Dynarski, S., Kane, T. J., & Pathak, P. (2009). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots. NBER Working Paper No. 15549, Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2009). The effects of high stakes high school achievement awards: Evidence from a group randomized trial. The American Economic Review, 99, 1384–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist, J., Bettinger, E., & Kremer, M. (2006). Long-term educational consequences of secondary school vouchers: Evidence from administrative records in Colombia. The American Economic Review, 96, 847–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angrist, J., Lang, D., & Oreopoulos, P. (2009). Incentives and services for college achievement: Evidence from a randomized trial. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1, 136–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angrist, J., Dynarski, S., Kane, T. J., Pathak, P., Walters, C.R. (2010). Who benefits from KIPP? NBER Working Paper No. 15740. Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behrman, J., Sengupta, P., Todd, P. (2001). Progressing through PROGRESA: An impact assessment of a school subsidy experiment. Penn Institute for Economic Research Working Paper 01–033. http://pier.econ.upenn.edu/Archive/01-033.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2010.
  7. Bettinger, E. (2010). Paying to learn: The effect of financial incentives on elementary school test scores. NBER Working Paper No. 16333. Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, D. (2009). The performance and competitive effects of school autonomy. Journal of Political Economy, 117, 745–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dee, T. (2009). Conditional cash penalties in education: Evidence from the learnfare experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 15126. Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duflo, E., & Hanna, R. (2005). Monitoring works: Getting teachers to come to school. NBER Working Paper No. 11880. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  12. OECD. (2007). Education at a Glance. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.Google Scholar
  13. Figlio, D. N., & Kenny, L. (2006). Individual teacher incentives and student performance. NBER Working Paper No. 12627. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  14. Figlio, D. N., & Rouse, C. E. (2006). Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools? Journal of Public Economics, 90, 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fryer, R. (2010). Financial incentives and student achievement: Evidence from randomized trials. NBER Working Paper No. 15898. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  16. Hastings, J. S., & Weinstein, J. M. (2007). No child left behind: Estimating the impact on choices and student outcomes. NBER Working Paper No. 13009. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, C. K. (2010). A stitch in time: The effects of a novel incentive-based high-school intervention -on college outcomes. NBER Working Paper No. 15722. Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacob, B. A. (2002). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. NBER Working Paper No. 89868. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  19. Jacob, B., & Levitt, S. (2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. NBER Working Paper No. 9413. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  20. Kremer, M., Miguel, E., & Thornton, R. (2004). Incentives to learn. NBER Working Paper No. 10971. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  21. Leuven, E., Oosterbeek, H., & van der Klaauw, B. (2010). The effect of financial rewards on students’ achievements: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8, 1243–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muralidharan, K., & Sundararaman, V. (2009). Teacher performance pay: Experimental evidence from India. NBER Working Paper No. 15323. Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The nation's report card: Trial urban district assessment reading 2009 (NCES 2010–459). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  24. Neal, D., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2007). Left behind by design: Proficiency counts and test-based accountability. NBER Working Paper No. 13293. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  25. Riccio, J., Dechausay, N., Greenberg, D., Miller, C., Rucks, Z., & Verma, N. (2010). Toward reduced poverty across generations early findings from New York City’s Conditional Cash Transfer Program. MDRC. www/mdrc.org. Accessed 19 April 2011.
  26. Rouse, C. E., & Barrow, L. (2009). School vouchers and student achievement: Recent evidence and remaining questions. Annual Review of Economics, 1, 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLe Moyne CollegeSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsSUNY-College at OneontaOneontaUSA