Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science

2013 Edition
| Editors: Saul I. Gass, Michael C. Fu

Project Management

  • Mark Westcombe
  • Graham K. Rand
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1153-7_817

Project management means different things to different people. Traditionally the domain of engineering, it has concerned itself with managing anything from small construction developments to large complex systems integration projects in defense, aerospace and other industries. A comprehensive survey of the development of project management since the 1940s and the issues involved in accomplishing projects is available in The Management of Projects (Morris 1997). In this period, OR/MS almost exclusively focused on the technical aspects of conforming to a contract using the iron triangle paradigm of management: to deliver a project to a pre-defined specification, on time, with an efficient use of resources within budget and with attention to safety. It accepted the project focus as the activities associated with the project lifecycle: defining scope; the work breakdown of the project plan; scheduling these activities; estimating costs; allocating resources and monitoring and controlling...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Ackerman, F., Eden, C., Williams, T., & Howick, S. (2007). Systemic risk assessment: a case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of Project Management. (2006). APM body of knowledge. High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balogun, J., Hailey, V. H., Johnson, J., & Scholes, K. (2008). Exploring strategic change. London: FT Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, C., & Ward, S. (2002). Managing project risk and uncertainty: A constructively simple approach to decision making. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Cooke-Davies, T. (2007). Managing benefit. In J. R. Turner (Ed.), Gower handbook of project management (pp. 245–259). Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  7. Crawford, L., Pollack, J., & England, D. (2006). Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eden, C. E., Williams, T. M., Ackermann, F. A., & Howick, S. (2000). On the nature of disruption and delay (D&D). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hodgson, D. E., & Cicmil, S. (2006). Making projects critical. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  10. Howick, S. M., & Eden, C. (2001). The impact of disruption and delay when compressing large projects: Going for incentives? Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morris, P. W. C. (1997). The management of projects. London: Thomas Telford.Google Scholar
  12. Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Newtown Square, PA: Author.Google Scholar
  13. Williams, T. M. (1995). A classified bibliography of research relating to project risk. European Journal of Operational Research, 85, 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Winter, M. (2009). Using soft systems methodology to structure project definition. In T. M. Williams, K. Samset, & K. J. Sunnevåg (Eds.), Making essential choices with scant information: Front-end decision-making in major projects (pp. 125–144). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P., & Cicmil, S. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 638–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Winter, M., & Szczepanek, T. (2009). Images of projects. Farnham, Surrey: Gower.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management ScienceLancaster UniversityLancasterUK