Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science

2013 Edition
| Editors: Saul I. Gass, Michael C. Fu

Problem Structuring Methods

  • Jonathan Rosenhead
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1153-7_806

Introduction

Problem structuring methods (PSMs) are a broad group of model-based problem handling approaches whose purpose is to assist in the structuring of problems rather than directly to derive a solution. They are participative and interactive in character, and normally operate with groups rather than individual clients. In principle they offer OR/MS access to a range of problem situations for which more classical OR techniques have limited applicability. The most widely adopted of these methods are Soft Systems Methodology, the Strategic Choice Approach, and Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA).

PSMs developed out of, or at least intertwined with, a critique of the restricted scope of traditional OR techniques. From the 1970s there developed an active debate over claims for the objectivity of OR/MS models, and about the limitations imposed on OR/MS practice by its concentration on well-defined problems. Significant critical contributions were made by Rittel and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ackerman, F., Bawden, R., et al. (2009). The case for soft or letter to the editor. ORMS Today, 36, 20–21.Google Scholar
  2. Ackoff, R. L. (1979). The future of operational research is past. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ackoff, R. L. (1981). The art and science of mess management. Interfaces, 11, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Re-creating the corporation: A design of organization for the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems thinking systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology, and its use for practitioners teachers and students. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in practice. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Eden, C. (1982). Problem construction and the influence of OR. Interfaces, 12, 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making strategy: The journey of strategic management. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Friend, J., & Hickling, A. (2004). Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach (3rd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  13. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  14. Howard, N. (1999). Confrontation analysis: How to win operations other than war, CCRP. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, M. C. (1987). Present positions and future prospects in management science. Omega, 15, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson, M. C., & Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Midgley, G., & Ochoa-Arias, A. E. (Eds.). (2004). Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. Mingers, J. (1992). Recent developments in critical management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mingers, J. (2009). Taming hard problems with soft O.R. – ‘Soft’ methodologies tackle messy problems that traditional O.R. can’t touch, so why isn’t it promoted in the U.S.? ORMS Today, 36, 48–53.Google Scholar
  20. Mingers, J., & Gill, A. (Eds.). (1997). Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal Operational Research, 152, 530–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ormerod, R. J. (1996). Information systems strategy development at sainsbury’s supermarkets using “Soft” ORC. Interfaces, 26, 102–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paucar-Caceres, A. (2011). The development of management sciences/operational research discourses: surveying the trends in the US and UK. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 1452–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenhead, J. (1986). Custom and practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 37, 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenhead, J. (Ed.). (1989). Rational analysis for a problematic world: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (Eds.). (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenhead, J., & Thunhurst, C. (1982). A materialist analysis of operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33, 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Vidal, R. V. V. (2004). Special issue on applications of problem structuring methods. European Journal Operational Research, 152, 631–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Operational ResearchThe London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK