Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology

2012 Edition
| Editors: Robert A. Meyers

High Speed Rail, Technology Development of

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_902

Definition of the Subject

High-Speed Rail is an advanced railway technology for carrying passengers at high speeds. It can be defined as the infrastructure capability to support high-speed rolling stocks. In the transport literature, rail (or railway) and train are often used synonymously [15]. In this section of the Encyclopedia of Sustainability the term will be used as High-Speed Train with reference to the technological development of both the vehicle (the train) and the track (the railways) but also with a reference to the trainas a carrier and high-speed train not as a single element but as a system. Moreover, the main focus is on the passenger transport, although some emphasis will be made on the freight transport. Late twentieth century witnessed the return of the train as an important passenger transport mode and the reason for this is the rapid development of the high-speed rail technology. Twenty-first century is witnessing even a larger impact of train as a transport...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. 1.
    Banister D (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp Policy 15:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banister D (2011) The triology of distance, space and time. J Transp Geogr 19:950–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banister D, Berechman J (2000) Transport investment and economic development. UCL Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradsher K (2010) China is eager to bring high-speed rail expertise to the US. NY Times, 7 April 2010Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cervero R (2002) Induced travel demand: research design, empirical evidence, and normative policies. J Plan Lit 17(1):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper M (2011) Administration pitches big rail projects. NY Times, 8 Feb 2011. www.nytimes.com/2011/02/09/us/09rail.html?ref=highspeedrailprojects
  7. 7.
    Deutche Bahn (2011) The ICE. Deutsche Bahn's fastest train. http://www.bahn.com/i/view/GBR/en/trains/overview/ice.shtml. Accessed 10 Apr 2011
  8. 8.
    Ewing R, Lichtenstein A (2002) Induced traffic and induced development: a literature review, Prepared for the Chester County Planning CommissionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellwanger G, Wilckens M (1994) High speed for Europe. JPN Railway Transp Rev 3:17–25Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    European Commission (2001) White paper, European transport policy for 2010: time to decide. www.ec.europa.eu. Accessed 28 May 2011
  11. 11.
    European Commission (2004) M1 directive of the European parliament and of the council of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the conventional rail. www.eur-lex.europa.eu. Accessed 28 May 2011
  12. 12.
    European Commission (2010) EU energy and transport in figures statistical pocketbook 2010. www.ec.europa.eu. Accessed 14 May 2011
  13. 13.
    European Commission (2011) Trans-European networks. www.ec.europa.eu/ten/index. Accessed 12 May 2011
  14. 14.
    Givoni M, Banister D (2008) Reinventing the wheel – planning the rail network to meet mobility needs of the 21st century. TSU working paper, Ref. 1036Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Givoni M (2006) The development and impact of the modern high speed train. Transp Rev 26(5):593–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Givoni M, Brand C, Watkiss P (2009) Are railways ‘climate friendly’? Built Environ 35(1):70–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Givoni M, Rietveld P (2010) Access to rail in urban areas – examination of the number of stations. TSU working paper, Ref. 1044Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Graham S, Marvin S (2001) Splintering urbanism. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hall P, Banister D (1993) The second railway age. Built Environ 19(3/4):157–162Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall P (2009) Magic carpets and seamless webs: opportunities and constraints for high-speed trains in Europe. Built Environ 35(1):59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harvey D (1990) The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    HS1 (2011) Key facts. http://www.highspeed1.com/about/facts/. Accessed 12 May 2011
  23. 23.
    JR-Central (2011) Central Japan Railway Company, about the Shinkansen, safety. http://english.jr-central.co.jp/about/safety.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2011
  24. 24.
    JR-Central (2011) Central Japan Railway Company, company profile. http://english.jr-central.co.jp/company/company/about/history.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2011
  25. 25.
    JR-Central (2011) Central Japan Railway Company, FY2011 key measures and capital investment. Report can be accessed on http://english.jr-central.co.jp/index.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2011
  26. 26.
    Martínez Sánchez-Mateos HS, Givoni M (2009). The accessibility impact of a new high-speed rail line in the UK: a preliminary analysis of winners and losers. TSU working paper series, Ref. 1041Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Menendez JM, Guirao B, Coronado JM, Rivas A, Rodriguezi FJ, Ribalaygua C, Urefia JM (2002) New high-speed rail lines and small cities: locating the station. In: Brebbia CA, Martin-Duque JF, Wadhwa LC (eds) The sustainable city II. WIT Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Railisa (2011) The UIC statistics database. www.railisa.tsf.it/railisa/ password required and can be obtained from the UIC website
  29. 29.
    RTRI (2011) Japan Railway Technical Research Institute, Overview of MAGLEV R&D. http://www.rtri.or.jp/rd/division/rd77/yamanashi/english/maglev_frame_E.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2011
  30. 30.
    SNCF (2010) Profile and key figures. http://medias.sncf.com/resources/en_EN/medias/MD0006_20100210/file_pdf.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2011
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    Spiekermann K, Wegener M (2008) The Shrinking continent: accessibility, competiveness, and cohesion. In: Faludi A (ed) European spatial research and planning. Lincoln Institute, Cambridge, MA, pp 115–139Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tentea (2011) TEN-T projects, Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency. www.tentea.ec.europa.eu/en/ten-t_projects/. Accessed 11 May 2011
  34. 34.
    UIC (2010) High speed rail: fast track to sustainability. www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/20101124_uic_brochure_high_speed.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2011
  35. 35.
    UIC (2011) High speed principles and advantages. http://www.uic.org/spip.php?article443#outil_sommaire_0. 11 Apr 2011
  36. 36.
    UIC (2011b) High speed lines in the world – UIC High Speed Department. http://www.uic.org/spip.php?article573. Accessed 11 Apr 2011
  37. 37.
    Vickerman R (1997) High-speed rail in Europe: experience and issues for future development. Ann Regional Sci 31:21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    European Commission (1996) Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system. Official Journal of the European Communities, 17 Sep 1996. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1996:235:0006:0024:EN:PDF. Accessed 22 Aug 2011
  39. 39.
    Taniguchi M (1993) The Japanese magnetic levitation trains. Built Environ19(3/4):235–243Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Campos J, de Rus G (2009) Some stylized facts about high-speed rail: A review of HSR experiences around the world. Transp Policy 16:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    UIC (2005) High Speed Rail’s leading asset for customers and society. UIC Publications, Paris. Accessible at: www.uic.asso.fr cited in Campos J, de Rus G (2009)
  42. 42.
    Ampe F (1995) Technopole development in Euralille. In: Banister D (ed) Transport and urban development. E & F.N. Spon, London, pp 128–135Google Scholar

Books and Reviews

  1. Ampe F (1996) Technopole development in Euralille. In: Banister D (ed) Transport and urban development. E & F.N. Spon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Banister D, Goodwin MT (2011) Quantification of the non-transport benefits resulting from rail investment. J Transp Geogr 19(2):212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brons M, Givoni M, Rietveld P (2009) Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. Transport Res A 43:136–149Google Scholar
  4. Campos J, Gagnepain P (2009) Measuring the intermodal effects of high-speed rail. In: Rus G (ed) Economic analysis of high speed rail in Europe. BBVA Foundation, MadridGoogle Scholar
  5. Coto-Milla´n P, Inglada V (2004) Social benefit of investment projects: the case for high-speed rail. In: Coto-Millan P (ed) Essays on microeconomics and industrial organisation. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Rus G, Nombela G (2007) Is the investment in high speed rail socially profitable? J Transp Econ Policy 41(1):3–23Google Scholar
  7. Department for Transport (2010) High speed rail London to the West Midlands and beyond – A report to the government by high speed two limited. www.dft.gov.uk
  8. Garmendia M, Ureña JM, Ribalaygua C, Leal J, Coronado JM (2008) Urban residential development in isolated small cities that are partially integrated in metropolitan areas by high speed train. Eur Urban Reg Stud 15:249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Givoni M, Banister D (2006) Airline and railway integration. Transp Policy 13:386–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Givoni M (2007) Environmental benefits from mode substitution - comparison of the environmental impact from aircraft and high-speed train operation. Int J Sust Trans 1(4):209–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Givoni M, Holvad T (2009) The prospects for European railways: is the second railway age still here or yet to begin? Built Environ 35(1):5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Givoni M, Rietveld P (2007) The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel. Transp Policy 14:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. González-Savignat M (2004) Will the high-speed train compete against the private vehicle? Transp Rev 24(3):293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall P (1999) High-speed train and air: competitive or complementary? Paper presented at the Lake Arrowhead transportation symposium, 25 Oct 1999Google Scholar
  15. Holvad T (2009) Review of railway policy reforms in Europe. Built Environ 35(1):24–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mokhtarian PL, Salomon I (2001) How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transport Res A 35:695–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murikami J, Cervero R (2010) California high-speed rail and economic development: postindustrial market profiles and public policy implications, symposium, Berkeley, 2–3 Dec 2010Google Scholar
  18. Norman C, Vickerman R (1999) Local and regional implications of trans-European transport networks: the channel tunnel rail link. EnvironPlann A 31:705–718Google Scholar
  19. Preston J (2009) Trends in European railways over the last two decades. Built Environ 35(1):11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rietveld P (2002) Why railway passengers are more polluting in the peak than in the off-peak; environmental effects of capacity management by railway companies under conditions of fluctuating demand. Transport Res D 7(5):347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sánchez-Borràs M, Nash C, Abrantes P, López-Pita A (2010) Rail access charges and the competitiveness of high speed trains. Transp Policy 17:102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sasaki K, Ohashi T, Ando A (1997) High-speed rail transit impact on regional systems: does the Shinkansen contribute to dispersion? Ann Regional Sci 31:77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steer Davies Gleave (2004) High speed rail: international comparisons. Final report for the commission for integrated transport (February). http://cfit.independent.gov.uk/pubs/2004/hsr/research/pdf/hsr.pdf
  24. Takagi R (2005) High speed railways: the last 10 years. JPN Railway Transp Rev 40:4–7Google Scholar
  25. Ureña JM, Menerault P, Garmendia M (2009) The high-speed rail challenge for big intermediate cities: a national regional and local perspective. Cities 26:266–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whitelegg J, Hultén S, Flink T (1993) High speed trains: fast tracks to the future? Leading Edge Press, HawesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the EnvironmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK