Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

PHEVs and BEVs in Coupled Power and Transportation Systems

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

BEV:

Battery electric vehicle.

DSM:

Demand side Management; utility-sponsored programs to influence the time of use and amount of energy use by select customers.

G2V:

Grid-to-vehicle; using the electrical grid to charge the battery of a vehicle.

HEV:

Hybrid electric vehicle.

OM:

Outage management; set of manual and/or automated procedures used by operators of electric distribution systems to assist in restoration of power.

PHEV:

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle.

V2B:

Vehicle-to-building; exporting electrical power from a vehicle battery into a building.

V2G:

Vehicle-to-grid; exporting electrical power from a vehicle battery to the electrical grid.

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. Lemoine DM, Kammen DM, Farrell AE (2008) An innovation and policy agenda for commercially competitive plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Environ Res Lett 3(1):014003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schrank D, Lomax T (2007) The 2007 urban mobility report. Texas Transportation Institute

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force (2004) Final report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: causes and recommendations. http://www.nerc.com

  4. Burges K, Twele J (2005) Power systems operation with high penetration of renewable energy – the German case. In: 2005 international conference on future power systems, Amsterdam, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Turvey MT, Moreno M (2006) Physical metaphors for the mental lexicon. Ment Lexicon 1:7–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Orden GC, Holden JG, Turvey MT (2003) Self-organization of cognitive performance. J Expr Psychol Gen 132:331–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks AN (2002) Vehicle-to-grid demonstration project: grid regulation ancillary service with a battery electric vehicle. AC Propulsion, California

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duncan R, Osborne MJ (2005) Report on transportation convergence, Austin energy

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kempton W, Tomic J, Letendre S, Brooks A, Lipman T (2001) Vehicle-to-grid power: battery, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles as resources for distributed electric power in California. Report # UCD-ITS-RR-01-03, Electric transportation program

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kempton W, Tomic J (2005) Vehicle to grid implementation: from stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy. Power Sources 144(1):280–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kintner-Meyer M, Schneider K, Pratt R (2007) Impacts assessment of plug-in hybrid vehicles on electric utilities and regional U.S. power grids, part 1: technical analysis

    Google Scholar 

  13. Solomon J, Vincent R (2003) Development and evaluation of a plug-in HEV with vehicle-to-grid power flow. Final report, A.C. Propulsion

    Google Scholar 

  14. Letendre S, Perez R, Herig C (2002) Battery-powered, electric-drive vehicles providing buffer storage for PV capacity value. In: Proceedings of the 2002 American solar energy society annual conference, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kempton W, Tomić J (2005) Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: calculating capacity and net revenue. J Power Source 144(1):268–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kempton W, Tomić J (2005) Vehicle-to-grid implementation: from stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy. J Power Source 144(1):280–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadley SW, Tsvetkova A (2008) Potential impacts of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on regional power generation. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, ORNL/TM-2007/150. http://apps.ornl.gov/~pts/prod/pubs/ldoc7922_regional_phev_analysis.pdf

  18. Meliopoulos S, Meisel J, Cokkinides G, Overbye T (2009) Power system level impacts of plug-in hybrid vehicles, PSerc project T34 final report #09-12. http://www.pserc.wisc.edu/documents/publications/reports/2009_reports/

  19. Andersson SL, Elofsson AK, Galus MD, Goransson L, Karlsson S, Johnsson F, Andersson G (2010) Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles as regulating power providers: case studies of Sweden and Germany. Energy Policy 38(6):2751–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guille C, Gross G (2009) A conceptual framework for the vehicle-to-grid (V2G) implementation. Energy Policy 37(11):4379–4390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lerner EJ (2003) What’s wrong with the electric grid? The industrial Physicist, Oct/Nov 2003

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wardrop JG (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc Inst Civil Eng 1(2):325–378

    Google Scholar 

  23. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information (2007) Traffic volume trends. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov

  24. Toole-Holt L, Polzin SE, Pendyala RM (2005) Two minutes per person per day each year: exploration of growth in travel time expenditures. Transp Res Rec 1917:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hadley SW (2006) Impact of plug-in hybrid vehicles on the electric grid. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, for the U.S. department of energy, ORNL/TM-2006/554

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bhat CR, Guo JY, Srinivasan S, Sivakumar A (2004) A comprehensive econometric microsimulator for daily activity-travel patterns. Transp Res Rec 1894:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vovsha P, Petersen E, Donnelly R (2004) Impact of intra-household interactions on individual daily activity-travel patterns. In: Proceedings of the 83rd annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bowman JL, Bradley MA (2005) Activity-based travel forecasting model for SACOG, technical memos numbers 11–11. http://jbowman.net

  29. Waller ST, Ziliaskopoulos AK (1998) A visual interactive system for transportation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 78th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor NB (1990) CONTRAM 5: an enhanced traffic assignment model. TRLL research report 249

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ben Akiva M, Bierlaire M, Koutsopoulos H, Mishalini R, DynaMIT (1998) A simulation-based system for traffic prediction and guidance generation. Presented at TRISTAN III, Delft, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mahmassani HS, Hu TY, Jayakrishnan R (1992) Dynamic traffic assignment and simulation for advanced network informatics (DYNASMART). In: Proceedings of the second international capri seminar on urban traffic networks, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  33. Arnott R, Small K (1994) The economics of traffic congestion. Am Scientists 20:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hearn DW, Ramana MV (1998) Solving congestion toll pricing models. In: Marcotte P, Nguyen S (eds) Equilibrium and advanced transportation modeling. Kluwer, Boston, pp 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  35. Morrison SA (1986) A survey of road pricing. Transp Res 20A(2):87–97

    Google Scholar 

  36. Waller ST, Schofer JL, Ziliaskopoulos AK (2001) Evaluation with traffic assignment under demand uncertainty. Transp Res Rec 1771:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Karoonsoontawong A, Waller ST (2006) Dynamic continuous network design problem: linear bi-level programming and metaheuristic approaches. Transp Res Rec 1964:104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ukkusuri S, Tom VM, Waller ST (2007) Robust network design problem under demand uncertainty. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 22:6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Waller ST, Ziliaskopoulos AK (2006) A chance-constrained based stochastic dynamic traffic assignment model: analysis, formulation and solution algorithms. Transp Res C: Emerg Technol 14(6):418–427

    Google Scholar 

  40. Duthie J, Unnikrishnan A, Waller ST (2006) Network evaluation with uncertain and correlated long-term demand. In: Proceedings of 85th transportation research board meeting, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stefopoulos G, Meliopoulos APS, Cokkinides G (2005) Probabilistic power flow with non-conforming electric loads. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 27(9–10):627–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gollmer R, Neise U, Schultz R (2007) Risk modeling via stochastic dominance in power systems with dispersed generation. Technical report, Department of mathematics, University of Duisburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  43. Choi BK, Chiang HD, Li YH (2006) Measurement-based dynamic load models: derivation, comparison, and validation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21:1689–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Short W, Denholm P (2006) A preliminary assessment of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on wind generation markets. Technical report, NREL/TP-620-39729

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tomic J, Kempton W (2007) Using fleets of electric drive vehicles for grid support. J Power Sources 168(2):459–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kempton W, Kubo T (2000) Electric-drive vehicles for peak power in Japan. Energy Policy 28:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Denholm P, Short W (2006) An evaluation of utility system impacts and benefits of optimally dispatched plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Technical report, NREL/TP-620-40293

    Google Scholar 

  48. Argon National Laboratory Tools. http://www.transportation.anl.gov/software/PSAT/index.html

  49. Kasztenny B, Kezunovic M (2000) A method for linking different modeling techniques for accurate and efficient simulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(1):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Busemeyer JR (2002) Dynamic decision making. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, vol 6. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 3903–3908

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fu WT, Anderson JR (2006) From recurrent choice to skill learning: a reinforcement-learning model. J Exp Psychol Gen 135:184–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gray WD, Sims CR, Fu W-T, Schoelles MJ (2006) The soft constraints hypothesis: a rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychol Rev 113:461–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gureckis TM, Love BC (2009) Short term gains, long term pains: reinforcement learning in dynamic environments. Cognition 113:293–313

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gureckis TM, Love BC (2009) Learning in noise: dynamic decision-making in an uncertain environment. J Math Psychol 53:180–193

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhao T, Fu CC (2006) Infrastructure development and expansion under uncertainty: a risk-preference-based lattice approach. ASCE J Constr Eng Manag 132(6):620–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang Z, Damnjanovic I (2006) Quantification of risk cost associated with short-term warranty-based specifications for pavements. Transp Res Rec 1946:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rohlfs JH (1974) A theory of interdependent demand for a communication service. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 5(1):16–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility and innovation. Rand J Econ 16:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. David PA, Greenstein S (1990) The economics of compatibility standards: an introduction to recent research. Econ Innovat New Tech 1:3–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Jonsbraten TW, Wets RJB, Woodruff DL (1998) A class of stochastic programs with decision dependent random elements. Ann Oper Res 82:83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gellings CW (1985) The concept of demand-side management for electric utilities. Proc IEEE 73(10):1468–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. NERC (2007) Data collection for demand-side management for quantifying its influence on reliability: results and recommendations. In: North American electric Reliability Corporation, Princeton. http://www.nerc.com/docs/pc/drdtf/NERC_DSMTF_Report_040308.pdf

  64. IIEC (2006) Demand side management best practices guidebook or pacific island power utilities. International Institute for Energy Conservation, Washington, DC. www.sidsnet.org/docshare/other/20070110DSMBestpractices.pdf

  65. Kezunovic M, Ward J et al (2009) Integration of asset and outage management tasks for distribution systems. PSerc project T36 final report #09-11. http://www.pserc.wisc.edu/documents/publications/reports/2009_reports/

  66. Itron, Inc. (2006) California commercial end-use survey: consultant report. CEC-400-2006-005, California Energy Commission. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-400-2006-005/CEC-400-2006-005.PDF

  67. SAE (2010) Recommended practice for electric vehicle and plug in hybrid electric vehicle conductive charger coupler, SAE standard J1772, Jan 2010

    Google Scholar 

  68. Radial Test Feeders – IEEE distribution system analysis subcommittee. http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pes/dsacom/testfeeders.html

Books and Reviews

  • Dowds J, Hines P et al (2010) Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle research project: phase two report. Burlington, VT, Transportation research center. UVM TRC report #:10–001. http://www.uvm.edu/~trans…reports/UVM-TRC-10-001.pdf

  • Galus MD, Andersson G (2008) Demand management of grid connected plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV). In: Energy 2030 conference, ENERGY 2008. IEEE, 17–18 Nov 2008, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Galus MD, Andersson G (2009) Integration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles into energy networks. PowerTech, 2009 IEEE bucharest. June 28–July 2 2009, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Galus MD, Andersson G (2009) Power system considerations of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles based on a multi energy carrier model. In: Power & energy society general meeting, PES ‘09. IEEE. 26–30 July 2009, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton W, Udo V et al (2008) A test of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) for energy storage and frequency regulation in the PJM system. University of Delaware, Pepco Holdings, Inc, PJM interconnect, and Green Mountain College. http://www.magicconsortium.org/_Media/test-v2g-in-pjm-jan09.pdf

  • Markel T, Simpson A (2005) Energy storage systems considerations for grid-charged hybrid electric vehicles. In: Vehicle power and propulsion, 2005 IEEE conference. 7–9 Sept 2005. http://www.nrel.gov/vehiclesandfuels/vsa/pdfs/38538.pdf

  • Morrow K, Karner D et al (2008) Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging infrastructure review, Idaho National Laboratory. Report #: INL/EXT-08-15058. http://avt.inel.gov/pdf/phev/phevInfrastructureReport08.pdf

  • ORNL (2010) Plug-in hybrid value proposition study final report, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Report #: ORNL/TM-2010/46. http://www.sentech.org/phev/pdfs/PHEV%20Value%20Proposition%20Study%20Final%20Report%20Draft.pdf

  • Sullivan JL, Salmeen IT et al (2009) PHEV marketplace penetration: an agent based simulation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute. Report #: UMTRI-2009-32. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63507/1/102307.pdf

  • Turton H, Moura F (2008) Vehicle-to-grid systems for sustainable development: an integrated energy analysis. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 75(8):1091–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne J (2009) Impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on California’s electricity grid. Masters of environmental management degree, Duke University

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to acknowledge numerous colleagues and graduate students who contributed to the findings of this entry: Dr. Bradley Love, and Dr. Jennifer Duthie from The University of Texas at Austin, as well as Dr. Ivan Damnjanovic, and graduate students Mr. Chengzong Pang, Ms. Papiya Dutta, and Mr. Seok Kim from Texas A&M University. Funding for this study came from the National Science Foundation through I/UCRC grant for the Center for “PHEVs/BEVs: Transportation and Electricity Convergence,” and another NSF I/UCRC grant for the “Power Systems Engineering Research Center.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843-3128, TX, USA

    Dr. Mladen Kezunovic

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA

    Dr. S. Travis Waller

Authors
  1. Dr. Mladen Kezunovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. S. Travis Waller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mladen Kezunovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. RAMTECH LIMITED, Larkspur, CA, USA

    Robert A. Meyers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kezunovic, M., Waller, S.T. (2012). PHEVs and BEVs in Coupled Power and Transportation Systems. In: Meyers, R.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_824

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation