Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology

2012 Edition
| Editors: Robert A. Meyers

Active Pedestrian Protection System, Scenario-Driven Search Method for

  • Alberto Broggi
  • Pietro Cerri
  • Stefano Ghidoni
  • Paolo Grisleri
  • Ho Gi Jung
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_486

Definition of the Subject and Its Importance

This paper presents an application of a pedestrian detection system aimed at localizing potentially dangerous situations in specific urban scenarios. The approach used in this work differs from the ones implemented in traditional pedestrian detection systems, which are designed to localize all pedestrians in the area in front of the vehicle. Conversely this approach searches for pedestrians in critical areas only.

The great advantages of such an approach are that pedestrian recognition is performed on limited image areas – therefore boosting its time-wise performance – and no assessment on the danger level is finally required before providing the result to either the driver or an onboard computer for automatic maneuvers. A further advantage is the drastic reduction of false alarms, making this system robust enough to control nonreversible safety systems.

Introduction

This paper presents an innovative approach to the detection of pedestrians,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    O’Farrell J (2006) May contain nuts. Black Swan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lucchini E, Kramer M (1981) Safety device for the protection of pedestrians. PatentGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matsuura Y, Maki T (2001) Device for reducing the impact of pedestrians. PatentGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Myrholt H, Ericsson M (2002) Deployable A-pillar covers for pedestrian protection. PatentGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buehler M, Iagnemma K, Singh S (eds) (2010) The DARPA urban challenge. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agran PF, Winn DG, Anderson CL, Tran C, Del Valle CP (1996) The role of the physical and traffic environment in child pedestrian injuries. Pediatrics 1996(98):1096–1103Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Retting RA, Ferguson SA, McCartt AT (2003) A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. J Public Health 2003(93):1456–1463Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Premebida C, Monteiro G, Nunes U, Peixoto P (2007) A lidar and vision-based approach for pedestrian and vehicle detection and tracking. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on intelligent transportation systems, Seattle, pp 1044–1049Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hwang JP, Cho SE, Ryu KJ, Park S, Kim E (2007) Multi-classifier based LIDAR and camera fusion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on intelligent transportation systems, Seattle, pp 467–472Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franke U, Heinrich S (2002) Fast obstacle detection for urban traffic situations. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 3(3):173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Curio C, Edelbrunner J, Kalinke T, Tzomakas C, Von Seelen W (2000) Walking pedestrian recognition. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 1(3):155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gandhi T, Trivedi MM (2007) Pedestrian protection systems: issues, survey, and challenges. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 8(3):413–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hodzic M (2008) Distronic plus and brake assist plus reduce rear-end collisions by 20%. http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/06/distronic-plus-and-brake-assist-plus-reduce-rear-end-collisions-by-20/. Accessed 30 May 2010
  14. 14.
    The Motor report (2010) Toyota Prius To ship with advanced safety gear. http://www.themotorreport.com.au/29611/2010-toyota-prius-to-ship-with-advanced-safety-gear. Accessed 30 May 2010
  15. 15.
    Juliussen E (2010) Driver assist systems. http://www.autofocusasia.com/electrical_electronics/driver_assist_systems.htm. Accessed 30 May 2010
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    BBC News (2010) Self-parking car hits the shops. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3198619.stm. Accessed 31 May 2010
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Clarke A, Dornfeld M J (1994) Traffic calming, auto-restricted zones and other traffic management techniques: their effects on bicycling and pedestrians. national bicycling and walking study, Case Study No. 19, Federal Highway Administration 1994Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang HF, Cynecki MJ (2001) The effects of traffic calming measures on pedestrian and motorist behavior. Research report FHWA-RD-00-104, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of TransportationGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crandall JR, Bhalla KS, Madeley NJ (2002) Designing road vehicles for pedestrian protection. Brit Med J 324(7346):1145–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yao J, Yang J, Otte D (2008) Investigation of head injuries by reconstructions of real-world vehicle-versus-adult-pedestrian accidents. Saf Sci 46(7):1103–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koch W, Howard M (2003) Comprehensive approach to increased pedestrian safety in pedestrian – Car accidents. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automobile Eng 217:513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fröming R, Schindler V, Kühn M (2006) Requirement engineering for active safety pedestrian protection systems based on accident research. In: Advanced microsystems for automotive applications, New York, pp 79–106Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schuster PJ (2006) Current trends in bumper design for pedestrian impact. SAE Paper No.: 2006-01-0464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fredriksson R, Håland Y, Yang J (2010) Evaluation of a new pedestrian head injury protection system with a sensor in the bumper and lifting of the bonnet’s rear part. http://www.autoliv.com/wps/wcm/connect/5f997a004ce4f3f8ac68eef594aebdee/Pedestrian.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. Accessed 30 May 2010
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Broge JL (2010) Autoliv actively saving lives. http://www.sae.org/automag/techbriefs/11-2001/page2.htm. Accessed 30 May 2010
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Kerkeling C, Schäfer J (2005) Structural hood and hinge concepts for pedestrian protection. In: Proceedings of 19th international technical conference on enhanced safety, Washington, DC, pp 379–389Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gernóimo D, López AM, Sappa AD, Graf T (2010) Survey of pedestrian detection for advanced driver assistance systems. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(7):1239–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun Z, Bebis G, Miller R (2006) On-road vehicle detection: a review. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(5):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hussein M, Porikli F, Davis L (2009) A comprehensive evaluation framework and a comparative study of human detector. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 10(3):417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Enzweileer M, Gavrila DM (2009) Monocular pedestrian detection: survey and experiments. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(2):2179–2195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Folster F, Rohling H, Meinecke M-M (2005) Pedestrian recognition based on automotive radar sensors. In: 5th European congress and exhibition on ITS and services, HanoverGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ritter H, Rohling H (2007) Pedestrian detection based on automotive radar. In: Proceedings of the international conference on radar systems, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    David K, Flach A (2010) CAR-2-X and pedestrian safety. IEEE Veh Technol Mag 3:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
    Broggi A, Cerri P, Ghidoni S, Grisleri P, Jung HG (2008) Localization and analysis of critical areas in urban scenarios. In: Proceedings of IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, Eindhoven, pp 1074–1079Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Leyrit L, Chateau C, Tournayre C, Lapresté J-T (2008) Association of Adaboost and kernel based machine learning methods for visual pedestrian recognition. In: Proceedings of IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, Eindhoven, pp 67–72Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Geismann P, Schneider G (2008) A two-staged approach to vision- based pedestrian recognition using Haar and HOG features. In: Proceedings of IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, Eindhoven, pp 554–559Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Viola P, Jones M (2001) Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 1. Hawaii, pp 511–518Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fuerstenberg K, Schulz R (2006) Laserscanners for driver assistance. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on intelligent transportation, Hamburg, pp 155–159Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Broggi
    • 1
  • Pietro Cerri
    • 1
  • Stefano Ghidoni
    • 2
  • Paolo Grisleri
    • 1
  • Ho Gi Jung
    • 3
  1. 1.VisLab – Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’InformazioneUniversità degli Studi di ParmaParmaItaly
  2. 2.Intelligent Autonomous System Laboratory (IAS-Lab), Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of PaduaPadovaItaly
  3. 3.The School of Mechanical EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeondong-guSouth Korea