Introduction
Functional societies, like functional individuals, engage in a selective winnowing of past events in the creation of their identities. They do this by both remembering and forgetting, partly out of necessity in order to manage an overwhelming amount of information and partly to minimize or mitigate traumatic experiences. At the group level, this process takes place in two ways: selective editing of the past in the form of preservation of only some parts of the archaeological or textual record (what in German is referred to as “Totschweigen,” literally to kill by silencing) and selective destruction of heritage. The preservation of the past is a form of selective editing at several levels – not all sites are chosen for excavation and only a small number of those that are excavated are highlighted in publications, heritage tourism, or museum exhibits, for example – while the destruction of the past literally erases sites or evidence and thereby ensures that it will not be...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, N. 1993. Architecture as the target. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 52: 389–90.
Arnold, B. 1999. The contested past. Anthropology Today 15: 1–4.
- 2002. Justifying genocide: archaeology and the construction of difference, in A.L. Hinton (ed.) Annihilating difference: the anthropology of genocide: 95–116. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Cameron, C. 2008. From Warsaw to Mostar: the World Heritage Committee and authenticity. APT Bulletin 39: 19–24.
Flood, F.B. 2002. Between cult and culture: Bamiyan, Islamic iconoclasm, and the museum. The Art Bulletin 84: 641–59.
Goldberg, S. 1999. The Enola Gay affair: what evidence counts when we commemorate historical events? Osiris 14: 176–86.
Hall, M. & R. Steffof. 2006. Great Zimbabwe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levy, J.E. 2006. Prehistory, identity and archaeological representation in Nordic museums. American Anthropologist 108: 135–47.
Makdisi, S. 2010. The architecture of erasure. Critical Inquiry 36: 519–59.
Nobile, P.(ed.) 1995. Judgement at the Smithsonian: the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. New York: Marlowe & Company.
Pollini, J. 1984. Damnatio memoriae in stone: two portraits of Nero recut to Vespasian in American museums. American Journal of Archaeology 88: 547–55.
- 2006. Review of E.R. Varner Mutilation and transformation: damnatio memoriae and Roman Imperial portraiture. The Art Bulletin 88: 590–7.
Ratnagar, S. 2004. Archaeology at the heart of a political confrontation: the case of Ayodhya. Current Anthropology 45: 239–59.
Rothfeld, L. 2008 (ed.) Antiquities under siege: cultural heritage protection after the Iraq War. Lanham (MD): Altamira Press.
Sauer, E. 2003.T he archaeology of religious hatred in the Roman and early medieval world. Stroud: Tempus.
Varner, E.R. 2004.M utilation and transformation: damnatio memoriae and Roman Imperial portraiture. Leiden: Brill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Arnold, B. (2014). Erasure of the Past. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_373
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_373
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law