Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Legislation in Archaeology: Overview and Introduction

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_276

State of Knowledge and Current Debates

Introduction

Every country in the world has some form of law relating to its cultural heritage. These range from the draconian (and sometimes relatively ineffective: Cleere 1984: 130) to the more loosely formulated and generally respected. In between lies the majority, more or less complex and more or less complied with. Some are “homegrown” and reflect particular local circumstances; others elsewhere are copied from neighboring or more distant places; others again have been adopted from past rulers but remain in place nonetheless. Law has been very important to the development of the idea of preserving material from the past (Carman 2012): laws have always proved a key means by which that preservation was effected. Laws also serve to legitimize the idea of that preservation.

This entry will look at the different kinds of laws that apply to the material heritage in different parts of the world and how they operate. In doing so, it is an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Bankowski, Z. & D.N. MacCormick. 1991. Statutory interpretation in the United Kingdom. 1991, in D.N. MacCormick & R.S. Summers (ed.) Interpreting statutes: a comparative study: 359-406. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bland, R. 2004. The Treasure Act and the portable antiquities scheme: a case study in developing public archaeology, in N. Merriman (ed.) Public archaeology: 272-91. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Breeze, D. 1996. Archaeological nationalism as defined by law in Britain, in J.A. Atkinson, I. Banks & J. O’Sullivan (ed.) Nationalism and archaeology (Scottish Archaeological Forum): 95–103. Glasgow: Cruithne Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burnham, B. 1974. The protection of cultural property: handbook of national legislations. Paris: ICOM.Google Scholar
  5. Carman, J. 1996. Valuing ancient things: archaeology and law in England. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. - 2002. Archaeology and heritage: an introduction. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. - 2012. Towards an international comparative history of archaeological heritage management, in R. Skeates, C. McDavid & J. Carman. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of public archaeology: 13-35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cleere, H.F. (ed.) 1984. Approaches to the archaeological heritage. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  9. - 1989. Archaeological heritage management in the modern world (One World Archaeology 9). London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  10. Cross, R. 1995. Statutory interpretation, 3rd edn. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Department of the Environment. 1990. Archaeology and planning: planning policy guideline note No. 16. London: Department of the Environment, November 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Dickerson, R. 1975. The interpretation and application of statutes. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  13. Dörge, H. 1971. Das Recht der Denkmalpflege in Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  14. Dromgoole, S. (ed.) 1999. Legal protection of the underwater cultural heritage: national and international perspectives. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Eberl, W., W. Schidermair & M. Petzet. 1975. Bayerisches Denkmalschutzgesetz. Munich: Deutscher Gemeindeverlag.Google Scholar
  16. English Heritage. 1991. Managing archaeological projects (MAP2). London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
  17. Fourmile, H. 1996. The law of the land: whose law? Whose land?, in A. Clark & L. Smith (ed.) Issues in management archaeology: 45-50. St. Lucia: Tempus Publications, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  18. Hangartner, Y. 1981. Rechtsfragen der Denkmalpflege. St Gallen: Schweizerisches Institut für Verwaltungskurse der Hochschule St Gallen.Google Scholar
  19. Hocke, M. 1975. Denkmalschutz in Österreich. Vienna: Jupiter-Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Hunter, J. & I. Ralston. (ed.) 2007. Archaeological resource management in the UK: an introduction, 2nd edn. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
  21. King, J.L., R.L. Gonzalez & M. del R. Gonzalez. 1980. Archaeologia y Derechoen México. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  22. Knudson, R. 1986. Contemporary cultural resource management, in D.J. Meltzer, D.D. Fowler & J.A. Sabloff (ed.) American archaeology past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology 1935-1985. 395-414. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  23. MacCormick, D.N. & R.S. Summers. (ed.) 1991. Interpreting statutes: a comparative study. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. McGimsey, C.R. 1972. Public archaeology. New York: Seminar Books.Google Scholar
  25. Pickard, R. (ed.) 2001. Policy and law in heritage conservation. London & New York: Spon.Google Scholar
  26. Prott, L.V. & P.J. O’Keefe. 1984. Law and the cultural heritage, Volume 1: discovery and excavation. Abingdon: Professional Books.Google Scholar
  27. Pugh-Smith, J. & J. Samuels. 1996. Archaeology in law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
  28. Rigambert, C. 1996. Le droit de l’archéologie francaise. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
  29. Skeates, R. 2000. Debating the archaeological heritage. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, L. 2004. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Summers, R.S. 1991. Statutory interpretation in the United States, in D.N. MacCormick & R.S. Summers. (ed.) Interpreting statutes: a comparative study: 407-60. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Summers, R.S. & M. Taruffo. 1991. Interpretation and comparative analysis, in D.N. MacCormick & R.S. Summers. (ed.) Interpreting statutes: a comparative study: 461-510. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Tarello, G. 1980. L’interpretazione della legge. Milan: Giuffry.Google Scholar
  34. Troper, M., C. Grzegorczyk & J.-L. Gardies. 1991. Statutory interpretation in France, in D.N. MacCormick & R.S. Summers (ed.) Interpreting statutes: a comparative study: 171-212. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Department of the Interior. 1989-90. Federal historic preservation laws. Edited by S.K. Blumenthal. Washington: US Department of the Interior.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Archaeology and AntiquityUniversity of BirminghamEdgbastonUK