Skip to main content

Structural Archaeology

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
  • 689 Accesses

Introduction

To write about the field of “structural archaeology” – where it comes from, what it does, and where we are now – means we must consider structuralism as an intellectual movement and how it impacted archaeology, although this is not all there is to it. It might seem at first that writing about structuralism in archaeology in these first decades of the twenty-first century can only be a historical commentary on an approach, a theory, and a method that we have gone through and beyond. Some researchers today might opine that a structural archaeology has been bypassed by other approaches and subsequent critiques. There are even terms for what developed supposedly “after” structuralist thinking and research, namely, post-structuralism and even structuration. And there are those who might suppose that even these afterlives of structuralism are faded and discarded paradigms and frameworks for the analysis and interpretation of archaeological materials and situations. Furthermore,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramiuk, M.A. 2012. The foundations of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, M. 1982. Decoration as ritual symbol: a theoretical proposal and an ethnographic study in southern Sudan, in I. Hodder (ed.) Symbolic and structural archaeology: 80-8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M.W. 1989. The structural analysis of Paleolithic art, in C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (ed.) Archaeological thought in America: 115-28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 2001. Structural and semiotic approaches, in D. Whitley (ed.) Handbook of rock art research: 273-310. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J. 1977. In small things forgotten. New York: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donley, L.W. 1982. House power: Swahili space and symbolic markers, in I. Hodder (ed.) Symbolic and structural archaeology: 63-73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. 1983. Literary theory: an introduction. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, J. 1983. Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J.M. 1978. Paleopsychology today: ideational systems and human adaptation in prehistory, in C.L. Redman, M.J. Berman, E.V. Curtin, W.T. Langhorne, Jr., N.M. Versaggi & J.C. Wanser (ed.) Social archaeology: beyond subsistence and dating: 37-60. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. 1982. What is structuralism?, in C. Renfew, M. Rowlands & B. Seagraves (ed.) Theory and explanation in archaeology: 97-123. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassie, H. 1975. Middle Virginia folk housing. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, T. 1977. Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (ed.) 1982a. Structural and symbolic archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1982b. Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view, in I. Hodder (ed.) Symbolic and structural archaeology: 1-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1986. Reading the past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. & S. Hudson. 2003. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, R. 2006. Structuralism and semiotics, in C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands & P. Spyer (ed.) Handbook of material culture: 29-42. London: Sage Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. 1986. Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology, in D. Meltzer, D. Fowler & J. Sabloff (ed.) American archaeology, past and future: 415-38. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1965. Treasures of prehistoric art. New York: Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. 1963. Structural anthropology. New York: Doubleday-Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1977. The concept of structuralism: a critical analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preucel, R. 2006. Archaeological semiotics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. 1959 (1915). Course in general linguistics. Translated by C. Bally and A. Sechehaye. London: Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. 1974. Rethinking symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. 1994. Towards a cognitive archaeology, in C. Renfrew & E.B.W. Zubrow (ed.) The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology: 3-12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. 1990. Claude Levi-Strauss: structuralism and beyond, C. Tilley (ed.) Reading material culture: 3-81. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. 1977. A symmetry analysis of Upper Gila Area ceramic design (Papers of the Peabody Museum 68). Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. 1982. Epistemological issues raised by a structuralist archaeology, in I. Hodder (ed.) Symbolic and structural archaeology: 39-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Bapty, I. & T. Yates. (ed.) 1990. Archaeology after structuralism: post-structuralism and the practice of archaeology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caws, P. 1968. What is structuralism? Partisan Review 35(1): 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. L. 1972. A provisional model of an Iron Age society and its settlement system, in D.L. Clarke (ed.) Models in archaeology: 801-70. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W. & J. M. Gero. 1997. Programme to practice: gender and feminism in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 411-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. 1975. Structuralist poetics: structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, M. H. 1970. Design structure and social interaction: archeological implications of an ethnographic analysis. American Antiquity 35(3): 332-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, T. 1981. Snakes and birds: expressive space at Great Zimbabwe. African Studies 40: 131-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P. 1984. Interpreting ideology in historical archaeology: the William Paca Garden in Annapolis, Maryland, in D. Miller & C. Tilley (ed.) Ideology, power and prehistory: 25-36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1966. La religion des grottes: magic or metaphysique? Sciences et Avenir 22: 105-11, 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, R. 1977. Ivory for the sea woman: the symbolic attributes of a prehistoric technology. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 1: 141-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. 1979. Structural studies of art styles, in J. M. Cordwell (ed.) The visual arts: plastic and graphic: 139-211. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. The Comparative Study of Society and History 10: 126-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. 1973. Structuralism: an introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. 1978. Historical archaeology: a structural approach in an African culture. Wesport (CT): Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, D.B. 1987. Toward a competent structuralist archaeology: a contribution from historical studies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6: 105-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. 1991. Material culture and text: the art of ambiguity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, T. 1979. The intelligence of later Acheulean hominids. Man 14: 371-91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Conkey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Conkey, M. (2014). Structural Archaeology. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_275

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_275

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics