Skip to main content

Adaptation in Archaeology

  • Reference work entry
  • 554 Accesses

Introduction

The theory of evolution is inherently attractive for archaeologists, who are concerned with the long-term history of humankind (Dunnell 1980). Changes through time during the long process of hominization are, by definition, adaptive. Adaptation is clearly one basic constituent of evolution. For that reason, the concept of adaptation – including the capacity for a cultural system to adjust to changes – is important in many approaches, particularly in ecologically oriented archaeology and, more recently, in evolutionary archaeology.

Definition

This variety of approaches using the concept of adaptation naturally leads to the existence of slightly different definitions (O’Brien & Holland 1992; Van Pool 2002).

Basically, adaptation refers to “the idea that organisms are fitted for the particular environments in which they live” (Alexander 1962: 826), or more directly to the “conformity between the organism and its environment” (Pianka 1983: 85).

It is accepted that an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, G. 1962. General biology. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, D.W. & J.F. O’Connell. 2006. Behavioral ecology and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 14: 143-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J. & E.A. Smith. 1998. Is it evolution yet? A critique of evolutionary archaeology. Current Anthropology 39: 141-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C. 1980. Evolutionary theory and archaeology, in M. Schiffer (ed.) Advances in archaeological method and theory, Volume 3: 35-99. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge (MA); London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R.L. 1995. The foraging spectrum. Diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, P.V. 1980. The archaeological study of adaptation: theoretical and methodological issues, in M. Schiffer (ed.) Advances in archaeological method and theory, Volume 3: 101-56. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 2010. Peopling of the Pacific: a holistic anthropological perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 131-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R.D. & G.T. Jones. 1987. Elements of an inclusive evolutionary model for archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6: 199-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, H. 1992. Ceramics and evolution, in M. Schiffer (ed.) Archaeological method and theory, Volume 4: 141-93. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J. 1987. Sedentism, population growth, and resource selection in the Woodland midwest: a review of coevolutionary developments. Current Anthropology 28: 177-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J. & T.D. Holland. 1992. The role of adaptation in archaeological explanation. American Antiquity 57: 36-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., R.L. Lyman & R.D. Leonard. 1998. Basic incompatibilities between evolutionary and behavioral archaeology. American Antiquity 63: 485-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R. 1983. Evolutionary ecology, 3rd edn. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss, A.M., J.C. Chatters & I. Kuijt. 2009. Macroevolution in human prehistory. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B. 1996. Some relationships between behavioral and evolutionary archaeologies. American Antiquity 61: 643-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinsohn, V. 2011. Adeptos a la adaptación: tres propuestas clásicas para la arqueología y una evaluación. Antipoda. Revista de Antropología Arqueológica 13: 55-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. 1955. Theory of culture change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Pool, T.L. 2002. Adaptation, in J.P. Hart & J.E. Terrell (ed.) Darwin and archaeology: 15-28. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. & N. Eldredge. 1984. Individuals, hierarchies, and processes: towards a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology 10: 146-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. 1949. The science of culture: a study of man and civilization. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Alberto Borrero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Borrero, L.A. (2014). Adaptation in Archaeology. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_251

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_251

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics