Introduction and Definition
Time since death (TSD) is defined as the time frame between death and discovery of an organism. When estimated in an archaeological context, this time frame may be referred to as time since deposition and in a forensic context can be termed postmortem interval. Time since death cannot be established with certainty and for this reason is provided as an estimate of the range of time encompassing the period when death occurred. A shorter postmortem interval is typically associated with a narrower time range, while a longer postmortem interval has a broader time range and includes a wider margin of error. Presently, there is no single indicator which provides a reliable or accurate measure of the time since death of an organism.
Key Issues and Current Debates
Current Methods for Estimating Time Since Death
In a forensic investigation, the most reliable estimates of time since death are based upon observations and measurements made by a forensic pathologist...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Behrensmeyer, A.K. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology 4: 150–162.
Benninger, L.A., D.O. Carter & S.L. Forbes. 2008. The biochemical alteration of soil beneath a decomposing carcass. Forensic Science International 180: 70–75.
Brothwell, D. & H. Gill-Robinson. 2002. Taphonomic and forensic aspects of bog bodies, in W.D. Haglund & M.H. Sorg (ed.) Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory, and archaeological perspectives: 119–132. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Fleckinger, A. 2010. People from the ice, in A. Wieczorek & W. Rosendahl (ed.) Mummies of the world: 42–59. Munich: Prestel Verlag.
Forbes, S.L. 2008. Decomposition chemistry in a burial environment, in M. Tibbett & D.O. Carter (ed.) Soil analysis in forensic taphonomy: chemical and biological effects of buried human remains: 203–224. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Forbes, S.L. & K. Nugent. 2009. Dating of anthropological skeletal remains of forensic interest, in S. Blau & D. Ubelaker (ed.) Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology: 164–173. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Madea, B. 2005. Is there recent progress in the estimation of the postmortem interval by means of thanatochemistry? Forensic Science International 151: 139–149.
Nawrocki, S.P. 1995. Taphonomic processes in historic cemeteries, in A. L. Grauer (ed.) Bodies of evidence: reconstructing history through skeletal analysis: 49–66. New York: Wiley-Liss.
Sledzik, P.S. & M.S. Micozzi. 1997. Autopsied, embalmed, and preserved human remains: distinguishing features in forensic and historic contexts, in W.D. Haglund & M.H. Sorg (ed.) Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains: 77–90. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Spicka A., R. Johnson, J. Bushing, L.G. Higley & D.O. Carter. 2011. Carcass mass can influence rate of decomposition and release of ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen into gravesoil. Forensic Science International 209: 80–85.
Swann, L., S.L. Forbes & S.W. Lewis. 2010. Analytical separations of mammalian decomposition products for forensic science: a review. Analytica Chimica Acta 682: 9–22.
Ubelaker, D.H. 1997. Taphonomic applications in forensic anthropology, in W.D. Haglund & M.H. Sorg (ed.) Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains: 77–90. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Ubelaker, D.H., B.A. Buchholz & J.E. Stewart. 2006. Analysis of artificial radiocarbon in different skeletal and dental tissue types to evaluate date of death. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51: 484–488.
Van Belle, L.E., D.O. Carter & S.L. Forbes. 2009. Measurement of ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen influx into gravesoil during aboveground and belowground carcass (Sus scrofa) decomposition. Forensic Science International 193: 37–41.
Vass, A.A., W.M. Bass, J.D. Wolt, J.E. Foss & J.T. Ammons. 1992. Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution. Journal of Forensic Sciences 37: 1236–1253.
Vass A.A., S.A. Barshick, G. Sega, J. Caton, J.T. Skeen, J.C. Love & J.A. Synstelien. 2002. Decomposition chemistry of human remains: a new methodology for determining the postmortem interval. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47: 542–553.
Further Reading
Blau, S. & D. Ubelaker.(ed.) 2009. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Haglund, W.D. & M.H. Sorg. 1997. Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory, and archaeological perspectives. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Hunter, J., C. Roberts & A. Martin. 1997. Studies in crime: an introduction to forensic archaeology. London: Routledge. Reprint.
Tibbett, M. & D.O. Carter. 2008. Soil analysis in forensic taphonomy: chemical and biological effects of buried human remains. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Wieczorek, A. & W. Rosendahl. 2010.M ummies of the world: Munich: Prestel Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Forbes, S. (2014). Time Since Death in Bioarchaeology and Human Osteology. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_218
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_218
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law