Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology in Disaster Response

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_156

Introduction

Forensic anthropology has continued to demonstrate its usefulness to the field of disaster response since the publication of T. Dale Stewart’s Personal Identification in Mass Disasters (1970). Today, the increasing numbers of specialists in this area are applying their knowledge, skills, and research abilities to all aspects of disaster victim recovery and identification, personal effects management, and family assistance (Sledzik 2009).

Victims of mass disasters are often difficult to identify due to extensive trauma, fire, and other modifying forces associated with these types of incidents. Depending on the scale of the disaster, human remains may also be in advanced stages of decomposition by the time responders can extricate them from the scene, thus adding to the overall suite of identification challenges. In these circumstances, bereaved family members cannot be expected to provide reliable visual identifications of remains; instead, appropriate scientific practices...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Disclaimer

The author is an employee of the National Transportation Safety Board. The views expressed are the personal views of the individual and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Transportation Safety Board or the United States Government.

References

  1. Crowder, C., C. Rainwater, K. Hartnett, J. Fridie, B.J. Figura, J. Godbold, S. Warnasch & B. Adams. 2012. Roles of the forensic anthropologist at the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner. Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences 18: 393–4.Google Scholar
  2. De Cosmo, S. 2012. Decision support tool for mass fatality victim identification. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  3. Dirkmaat, D.C. 2012. Forensic anthropology at the mass fatality incident (commercial airliner) crash scene, in D.C. Dirkmaat (ed.) A companion to forensic anthropology: 136–56. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Dirkmaat, D.C., J.T. Hefner & M.J. Hochrein. 2001. Forensic processing of the terrestrial mass fatality scene: testing new search, documentation and recovery methodologies. Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences 7: 241–2.Google Scholar
  5. Dirkmaat, D.C., L.L. Cabo, S.D. Ousley & S.A. Symes. 2008. New perspectives in forensic anthropology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 51: 33–52.Google Scholar
  6. Figura, B.J. 2011. A Bayesian approach to disaster victim identification. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Binghamton University, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  7. Greene, R.W. 2002. Confronting catastrophe: a GIS handbook. Redlands: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kontanis, E.J. & P.S. Sledzik. 2008. Resolving commingling issues during the medicolegal investigation of mass fatality incidents, in B.J. Adams & J.E. Byrd (ed.) Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains: 317–36. Totowa: Humana Press.Google Scholar
  9. Levinson, J. & H. Granot. 2002. Transportation disaster response handbook. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mundorff, A.Z. 2008. Anthropologist-directed triage: three distinct mass fatality events involving fragmentation of human remains, in B.J. Adams & J.E. Byrd (ed.) Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains: 123–44. Totowa: Humana Press.Google Scholar
  11. National Academy of Sciences. 2009. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  12. O’Sullivan, D. & D. Unwin. 2003. Geographic information analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Sledzik, P.S. 2009. Forensic anthropology in disaster response, in S. Blau & D.H. Ubelaker (ed.) Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology: 374–87. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  14. Steadman, D.W., B.J. Adams & L.W. Konigsberg. 2006. Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 131: 15–26.Google Scholar
  15. Tuller, H., U. Hofmeister & S. Daley. 2008. Spatial analysis of mass grave mapping data to assist in the reassociation of disarticulated and commingled human remains, in B.J. Adams & J.E. Byrd (ed.) Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains: 7–29. Totowa: Humana Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Transportation Safety BoardWashingtonUSA