Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Fortifications, Archaeology of

  • Tony Pollard
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1367

Introduction and Definition

Defensive structures come in a wide variety of forms and cover an exceptionally long time frame; indeed there are relatively few societies existing either today or in the past that have not utilized some form of fortification, even if it was just a thorn brush fence around a group of huts. What is not clear is when they first appeared, though Mesolithic (c. 10,000–4,000 BCE) possibilities have been cited (Sippila & Lahelma 2006). In their most obvious guises, they range from European Iron Age hillforts to medieval castles, seventeenth-century Anglo-Scottish bastle houses, eighteenth-century fortresses, colonial stockades, and Maori Pãs to First and Second World War concrete defenses, but this list is just the tip of the iceberg. Although this wide portfolio of structures is an obvious response to interhuman conflict, or the threat of it, the nature of this conflict has almost as many variants as there are types of fortifications. This is not however the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Anonymous. 2012. Archaeologists uncover skeletons and weapons from 1628 battle. Available at: http://news.monstersandcritics.com/europe/news/article_1570519.php/Archaeologists-uncover-skeletons-and-weapons-from-1628-battle (accessed 3 September 2012).
  2. Armit, I. 2007. Hillforts at war: from Maiden Castle to Taniwaha Pa. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 73: 25–37.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, P., P. Doyle & J. Vandewalle. 2005. Beneath Flanders fields: the tunneller’s war 1914–1918. Quebec: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cocroft, W.D., R.J.C. Thomas & P.S. Barnwell. 2005. Cold War: building for nuclear confrontation 1946–89. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
  5. Eickhoff, S., A. Grothe & B. Jungklaus. 2009. Memento Mori - Söldnerbestattungen der Schlacht bei Wittstock 1636. Archäologie in Deutschland 1: 26–9.Google Scholar
  6. Feister, L.M. 1984. Building materials indicative of status differentiation at the Crown Point Barracks - 1759–1783. Historical Archaeology 18: 103–7.Google Scholar
  7. Fraser, A.H. & M. Brown. 2007. Mud, blood and missing men: excavations at Serre, Somme, France. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 3: 147–73.Google Scholar
  8. Harrington, P. 2005. Siege fields: an archaeological assessment of English civil war ‘small’ sieges. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 1: 93–113.Google Scholar
  9. Ive, P. 1589 (ed. 2008). ‘Servant to the king for his fortifications': Paul Ive and the practise of fortification. Edited by C. Stephenson. Doncaster: DP&G Military Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Ivey, J.E. & A.A. Fox. 1997. Archaeological and historical investigations at the Alamo North Wall San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas (Archaeological Survey Report 224). San Antonio: The University of Texas, Center for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
  11. Kelso, W.W. 2008. Jamestown, the buried truth. Charlottesville (VA): University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  12. Matzko, J. 2001. Reconstructing Fort Union. Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  13. Novotny, J. 2009. Digging deeper: recent publications on First World War archaeology. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 5: 273–82.Google Scholar
  14. Paget, J. & D. Saunders. 1992. Hougoumont: the key to victory at Waterloo. Barnsley: Pen and Sword.Google Scholar
  15. Pollard, T. 2006. Seven eventful days in Paraguay: reconnoitering the archaeology of the War of the Triple Alliance, in D. Scott, L. Babits & C. Haecker (ed.) Fields of conflict: battlefield archaeology from the Roman Empire to the Korean War: 314–36. Portsmouth (NH): Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  16. Pollard, T. & I. Banks. 2005. Survey and excavation of an Anglo-Zulu war fort at Eshowe, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 1: 133–80.Google Scholar
  17. - 2008a. The archaeology of the siege of Leith, 1560. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 4: 159–89.Google Scholar
  18. - 2008b. Archaeological investigation of military sites on Inchkeith Island. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 4: 109–36.Google Scholar
  19. Pollard, T. & N. Oliver. 2002. Two men in a trench: battlefield archaeology - the key to unlocking the past. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Sippila, J. & A. Lahelma. 2006. War as a paradigmatic phenomenon: endemic violence and the Finnish Sub-Neolithic. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 2: 189–211.Google Scholar
  21. Starbuck, D.R. 2010. Excavating the Sutlers' house: artifacts of the British armies in Fort Edward and Lake George. Dartford (CT): University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  22. Sussman, L. 1978. British military tableware 1760–1830. Historical Archaeology 12: 93–104.Google Scholar
  23. Viollet-Le-Duc, E.E. & B. Bucknell. 2009. Annals of a fortress: twenty-two centuries of Siege warfare. Mineola (NY): Dover Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Battlefield ArchaeologyUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK