Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Looting and Vandalism (Cultural Heritage Management)

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1216

Introduction and Definition

The looting of archaeological sites is today one of the major threats to the world’s cultural heritage, second only to the intensification of agriculture and to urban development. Looting in this context may be defined as the unrecorded destruction of archaeological sites in order to provide artifacts for sale on the illicit market for antiquities. What is shocking is that it derives, in some senses, from the recognition of the value of these tangible components of the cultural heritage. But instead of encouraging the careful preservation of their context of discovery, the price that such collectibles can command leads to clandestine excavation and the sale of “unprovenanced” antiquities. Their true value, of course, lies in what, when properly understood in their context of discovery and fully published by competent researchers, they can tell us about the shared past of humankind. Their commercial value is what they can command on the market, sold by...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Balter, M. 2007. University suppresses report on provenance of Iraqi antiquities. Science 318: 554-5.Google Scholar
  2. Bonhams. 2006. The Sevso treasure, a private exhibition. London: Bonhams.Google Scholar
  3. Bottoni, A. & E. Setari. (ed.) 2009. I marmi dipinti di Ascoli Satriano. Rome: Ministero per I Beni e le Attività Culturali.Google Scholar
  4. Brodie, N., Doole, J. & Renfrew C. (ed.) 2001. Trade in illicit antiquities: the destruction of the world’s archaeological heritage. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
  5. Brodie, N. & C. Renfrew. 2005. Looting and the world’s archaeological heritage, the inadequate response. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 343-61.Google Scholar
  6. Brodie, N. & K.W. Tubb. (ed.) 2002. Illicit antiquities, the theft of culture and the extinction of archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Gerstenblith, P. 2003. The Clain/Schultz doctrine: another step against the trade in stolen antiquities. Culture without Context 13: 5-8.Google Scholar
  8. Gill, D. 2011. Due diligence and auction houses. Available at: www.davidgill.co.uk/looting/default/html.
  9. O’Keefe, P. 1997.Trade in antiquities. Reducing destruction and theft. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  10. Renfrew, C. 2000. Loot, legitimacy and ownership. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  11. - 2010. Combating the illicit antiquities trade: progress and problems, in J. Papadopoulos & E. Proietti (ed.) International meeting on illicit traffic of cultural property. Rome: Gangemi Editore.Google Scholar
  12. Renfrew, C. & P. Bahn. 2008.A rchaeology, theory methods and practice, 5th edn. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  13. Schøyen. 2005. An inquiry into the provenance of 654 incantation bowls delivered into the custody of UCL by or on the authority of Mr Martin Schøyen by D. Freeman, S. MacDonald and C. Renfrew. Inquiry established by the Provost of UCL on 14th February 2005. [Published by Wikileaks 2009: see ‘Schøyen’. Available in the House of Lords Library, London].Google Scholar
  14. Silver, V. 2009. The lost chalice. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  15. Watson, P. 1997.Sotheby’s, the inside story. NewYork: Random House.Google Scholar
  16. Watson, P. & C. Todeschini. 2006. The Medici conspiracy, the illicit journey of looted antiquities. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologyMcDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge UniversityCambridgeUK