Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

United States: Cultural Heritage Management Education

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1193


Since the Society for American Archaeology issued its turn-of-the-century call for a renewed vision for archaeology education (Bender & Smith 2000), a profound change has taken root in this endeavor. Contributors to the 2000 SAA volume noted that the conceptual structure of archaeology’s curricula had changed little since the mid-twentieth century, despite significant advances in method, theory, data accumulation, and the contexts in which archaeological research was conducted. Major advances in scientific data acquisition techniques, analytical methods, and theoretical modeling had kept academic archaeologists’ vision of the discipline centered on its historiographic research aspects, yet at the same time the introduction of historic preservation law in the USA introduced a specifically public context for the discipline’s practice. In 2000, the call was for those who teach archaeology to acknowledge its public dimensions and begin to train students to understand and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access


  1. Ahmad, Y. 2006. The scope and definitions of heritage: from tangible to intangible. International Journal of Heritage Studies 12: 292-300.Google Scholar
  2. Bender, S. J. & G. S. Smith. (ed.) 2000. Teaching archaeology in the twenty-first century. Washington (DC): Society for American Archaeology.Google Scholar
  3. Chilton, E. & R. Mason. 2010. Social science of the past. National Science Foundation White Paper. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/all.cfm.
  4. Georgia State University, Historic Preservation n.d. Available at: http://www2.gsu.edu/∼wwwher/index.html (accessed 14 September 2011).
  5. Indiana University, Center for Archaeology in the Public Interest n.d. Available at: http://www.indiana.edu/∼capi/ (accessed 9 September 2011).
  6. Lowenthal, D. 1985. The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lynott, M. J. & A. Wylie. (ed.) 2000. Ethics in American archaeology. 2nd rev. ed. Washington (DC): Society for American Archaeology.Google Scholar
  8. M.A.T.R.I.X. n.d. Available at: http://www.indiana.edu/∼arch/saa/matrix/homepage.html (accessed 21 September 2011).
  9. Stone, P. G. & B. L. Molyneaux. 1994. The presented past: heritage, museums and education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Stone, P. G. & Ph. G. Planel. 1999. The constructed past: experimental archaeology, education and the public. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Texas Tech University, Heritage Management Program. 2011. Available at: http://www.depts.ttu.edu/museumttu/hmpdegSum.html (accessed 9 September 2011).
  12. University of Florida, Historic Preservation n.d. Available at: http://www.dcp.ufl.edu/historic-preservation (accessed 14 September 2011).
  13. University of Maryland, Graduate Studies n.d. Available at: http://www.bsos.umd.edu/anth/Programs/Graduate/index.html#introphil (accessed 9 September 2011).
  14. University of Massachusetts, Center for Heritage Studies n.d. Available at: http://www.umass.edu/chs/about/ourgoals.html (accessed 9 September 2011).
  15. University of Minnesota, Anthropology n.d. Available at: http://anthropology.umn.edu/graduate/ma.html (accessed 14 September 2011).
  16. University of Pennsylvania, Historic Preservation. n.d. Available at: http://www.design.upenn.edu/historic-preservation (accessed 14 September 2011).
  17. Zerubavel, E. 1996. Social memories: steps to sociology of the past. Qualitative Sociology 19: 283-299.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologySkidmore CollegeSaratoga SpringsUSA