Skip to main content
  • 180 Accesses

Introduction

Appraising the relationships between Psychology and religion is a complex task, and we need first to identify the various kinds of problems giving rise to this. Most fundamentally, the very phrase “Psychology and religion” is a misleading oversimplification, these clearly not referring to two unitary, mutually independent, camps, let alone camps of the same logical status. On the Psychology side, its sheer internal diversity in subject matters, methods, and goals renders any general statement about its relationship to religion impossible. On the religion side, not only is its internal diversity in some respects even greater than Psychology’s, but it is a logically different kind of phenomenon. While the status of Psychology is not unproblematic, at least it is unambiguously an academic discipline engaged in knowledge creation and application, and most academic experimental psychologists accept and assert that it is some kind of natural science. Religion, by contrast, is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 679.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 432–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1958). Religious behaviour. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1958). Sigmund Freud and the Jewish mystical tradition. Princteon: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Walnut Creek: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belzen, J. (2000). Tremendum et fascinans: On the early reception and nondevelopment of the psychology of religion among orthodox Dutch calvinists. In J. Belzen (Ed.), Aspects in contexts: Studies in the history of the psychology of religion (pp. 91–128). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bering, J. (2010). Under God’s skin: The hidden psychology of souls, destiny and the meaning of life. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (2010). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braham, E. G. (1936). Psychology and the child (L.D. Weatherhead, Foreword). London: Epworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. E. (1941). Thomistic psychology. A philosophical analysis of the nature of man. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, S. (1924). Moral and religious education. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (German 1923). I and Thou (2nd rev. ed. 1958) Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, J., Sosis, R., Harris, E., Genet, R., Genet, C., & Wyman, K. (2008). The evolution of religion: studies, theories, and critiques. Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G. (1845). The soul; or an inquiry into scriptural psychology, as developed by the use of the terms, soul, spirit, life, etc, viewed in its bearings on the doctrine of the resurrection. New York: J.S. Redfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, W. B. (1874). Principles of mental physiology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, A. (1933). The psychology of religion. Psychological Bulletin, 30, 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sanctis, S. (1927). Religious conversion: A bio-spcyhological study. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delitzsch, F. (1867). A System of biblical psychology (Trans. 1855). Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G. (1860). Elemente der psychophysik (Vol. 2). Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, D. (2003). Psychology, religion, and spirituality. Leicester: BPS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frager, R. (1999). Heart, self and soul: The Sufi psychology of growth, balance and harmony. Wheaton, IL: Quest Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E., Suzuki, D. T., & De Martino, R. (1960). Zen Buddhism and psychoanalysis. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. C. (2006). American psychology and the religious imagination. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 42(3), 221–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, S. (1998). The Emmanuel movement: The origins of group therapy and the assault on lay psychotherapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence. Its psychology and its relation to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime and education (Vol. 2). New York: D. Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1917). Jesus the Christ in the light of psychology (Vol. 2). Garden City: Doubleday, Page & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1930). Studies in the nature of character, Part I: Studies in deceit. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltner, S. (1949). Pastoral counseling. New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husain, A. (2006). Islamic psychology: Emergence of a new field. New Delhi: Global Vision.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly, H. (1898). The psychology of the saints. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugelmann, R. (in press) Psychology and Catholicism: Contested Boundaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M. (1999). Psychological knowledge: A social history and philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuba, J. H. (1922). The psychology of religious mysticism (rev. 1929). London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. (Ed.). (2000). The positive psychology of Buddhism and yoga. Englewood Cliffs: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Tung-Pin (1954). The secret of the golden flower (R. Wilhelm, Trans. & C. G. Jung, Commentary). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, J. (1885). Types of ethical theory. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1973). Paulus: A personal portrait of Paul Tillich. New York: Harper & Row; London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCosh, J. (1880). The emotions. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCosh, J. (1886). Psychology: The cognitive powers (2nd rev. ed. 1894) New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misiak, H., & Staudt, V. M. (1954). Catholics in psychology: A historical survey. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, F. W. H. (1893b). The subliminal consciousness. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 9, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, F. W. H. (1903). Human personality and its survival of bodily death (Vol. 2). London: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. M. (2009). Psychology, religion and spirituality. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, I. A. M. (2002). Inventing personality. Gordon Allport and the science of selfhood. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, O. (1948, German, 1944). Christianity and fear. A study in history and in the psychology and hygiene of religion. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, N. (1868, UK 1872). The Human Intellect with an Introduction upon Psychology and the Soul. London: Strahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (1987). Human evolution. An introduction for the behavioural sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (1992). Mental machinery the origins and consequences of psychological ideas (pp. 1600–1850). London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. D. (1995). To know our fellow men to do them good: American psychology’s continuing moral project. History of the Human Sciences, 8(3), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (2000a). Psychology and the churches in Britain 1919–1939: symptoms of conversion. History of the Human Sciences, 13(3), 57–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (2000b). Putting Britain on the couch: the popularisation of psychoanalysis in Britain 1918–1940. Science in Context, 13(2), 183–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (2011). Psychology, religion and the nature of the soul: A historical entanglement. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. S. (Ed.). (2000). Alas, poor Darwin. Arguments against evolutionary psychology. New York: Harmony.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schloss, J. P., & Murray, M. (Eds.). (2009). The believing primate: Scientific, philosophcial, and theological perspectives on the origins of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostrom, E. L. (1966). Personal orientation inventory: An inventory for the measurement of self-actualization. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signalling, solidarity, and the sacred: the evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spranger, E. (1925–1928). Types of men: The psychology and ethics of personality (5th German ed.). Halle: Niemayer/Steichart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, E. D. (1899). The psychology of religion. An empirical study of the growth of religious consciousness. London: Walter Scott (1st U.S. ed. 1900, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, B. H. (1927). Reality. A new correlation of science and religion. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thouless, R. H. (1923). An introduction to the psychology of religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L., & Chave, E. J. (1929). The measurement of attitude: A psychophysical method and some experiments with a scale for measuring attitudes toward the church. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vande Kemp, H. (1984). Key events in the history of pastoral counseling up to 1970. The Common Boundary between Spirituality and Psychotherapy, 2(2), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vande Kemp, H. (1986). Dangers of psychologism: The place of god in psychology. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 14(2), 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vande Kemp, H. (1996). Historical perspective: Religion and clinical psychology in America. In E. P. Shafranske (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (Chap. 3). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vande Kemp, H., & Malony, H. N. (1984). Psychology and theology in western thought 1672–1965. A historical and annotated bibliography. White Plains: Kraus International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, G. B. (1958). Magic and religion. Their psychological nature, origin and function. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (1988). Jean Piaget and the liberal protestant tradition. In M. G. Ash & W. R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 271–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, F. (1895). Report on the scientific study of the mental and physical conditions of childhood. London: Childhood Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Walnut Creek: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, R. (Trans.), foreword C.G. Jung (1960), I Ching (English Trans. from Wilhelm’s German by C.F. Baynes) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worcester, R., McComb, S., & Coriat, I. H. (1908). Religion and medicine. The moral control of nervous disorders (rev. 1920). London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D. M. (1997, 2nd ed.). Psychology, of Religion. Classic and Contemporary, Hoboken NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D. M. (2000). James Henry Leuba. A re-assessment of a Swiss-American pioneer. In J. Belzen (Ed.), Aspects in contexts: Studies in the history of the psychology of religion (pp. 24–55). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Richards .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Richards, G. (2012). Psychology and Religion. In: Rieber, R.W. (eds) Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0425-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0463-8

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics