Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories

2012 Edition
| Editors: Robert W. Rieber

Structuralism

  • Rand B. Evans
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_33

Introduction

Structuralism was a systematic, experimental, introspective psychology of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The term is typically identified with the systematic psychology of Edward Bradford Titchener (1867–1927). Titchener’s structuralism used analytical introspection as its primary method for most of its existence to reduce complex mental states to the simplest elemental mental processes that appear in consciousness. It explained those processes in terms of the physiological processes of the organism. The final form of Titchener’s psychology, called by him and his school “existential psychology,” diverged from the earlier elementistic form and used phenomenological description rather than analytical introspection and making no attempt at explanation. There is some question whether this last form of Titchener’s psychology, roughly between 1921 and 1927, should be called “structural” at all (Evans 1972).

The term “structuralism” has sometimes been used to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Angell, J. R. (1907). The province of functional psychology. Psychological Review, 14, 61–91.Google Scholar
  2. Bixby, F. L. (1928). A phenomenological study of luster. Journal of General Psychology, 1, 136–174.Google Scholar
  3. Blumenthal, A. L. (2001). A Wundt primer. In R. W. Rieber & D. K. Robinson (Eds.), Wilhelm Wundt in history; The making of a scientific psychology. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Boring, E. G. (1927). Edward Bradford Titchener: 1867–1927. American Journal of Psychology, 38, 489–506.Google Scholar
  5. Boring, E. G. (1933). Physical dimensions of consciousness. New York: The Century Co.Google Scholar
  6. Boring, E. G. (1938). Titchener and the existential. American Journal of Psychology, 50, 470–483.Google Scholar
  7. Bradley, J. (1971). Mach’s philosophy of science. London: Anthlone Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, H. (1911). Conscious attitudes. American Journal of Psychology, 22, 214–245.Google Scholar
  9. Danziger, K. (1979). The positivistic repudiation of Wundt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 205–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, R. B. (1972). E. B. Titchener and his lost system. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 8, 168–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, R. B. (1975). The origins of Titchener’s doctrine of meaning. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 11, 334–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebbinghaus, H. (1897). Grundzüge der psychologie. Leipzig: Veit & Co.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, R. B. (1990). The scientific and psychological positions of E. B. Titchener. In R. Leys & R. B. Evans (Eds.), Defining American psychology: The Correspondence between Adolf Meyer and Edward Bradford Titchener (pp. 1–38). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  14. Humphrey, G. (1963). Thinking: An Introduction to its experimental psychology. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Kreezer, G. (1930). Luminous appearances. Journal of General Psychology, 4, 247–281.Google Scholar
  16. Külpe, O. (1893). Grundriss der psychologie. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
  17. Külpe, O. (1895). Outlines of psychology: Based upon the results of experimental investigation. (trans: Titchener, E. B.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Külpe, O. (1913). The psychology of the present in Germany. (trans: Patrick, M. L., & Patrick, G. T. W.). London: George Allen & Co.Google Scholar
  19. Mach, E. (1914). The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical. (trans: Williams, C. M., & Waterlow, S.). Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  20. Mill, J. (1829). Analysis of the phenomena of the human mind. London: Baldwick and Craddock.Google Scholar
  21. Moller, E. F. (1925). The glassy sensation. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 249–285.Google Scholar
  22. Nafe, J. P. (1924). An experimental study of the affective qualities. American Journal of Psychology, 35, 507–544.Google Scholar
  23. Rahn, C. (1913). Sensation in contemporary psychology. Psychological Monographs, 16(67), 1–133.Google Scholar
  24. Titchener, E. B. (1896). An outline of psychology (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Titchener, E. B. (1897). An outline of psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Titchener, E. B. (1898a). A primer of psychology (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Titchener, E. B. (1898b). The postulates of a structural psychology. The Philosophical Review, 7, 449–465.Google Scholar
  28. Titchener, E. B. (1899a). A primer of psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Titchener, E. B. (1899b). An outline of psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Titchener, E. B. (1908). Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Titchener, E. B. (1909). The experimental psychology of the thought processes. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Titchener, E. B. (1910). A textbook of psychology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Titchener, E. B. (1915a). A beginner’s psychology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Titchener, E. B. (1915b). Sensation and system. American Journal of Psychology, 26, 258–267.Google Scholar
  35. Tweney, R. D., & Yachanin, S. A. (1980). Titchener’s Wundt. In W. G. Bringmann & R. D. Tweney (Eds.), Wundt studies: A centennial collection (pp. 380–395). Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  36. Watson, R. I., & Evans, R. B. (1991). The great psychologists: A history of psychological thought (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA