Dreams hang in fragments at the end of the (screening) room, suffered analysis, passed – to be dreamed in crowds, or discarded.
F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Last Tycoon
If the cinema is not made to translate dreams or all that which, in conscious life, resembles dreams, then the cinema does not exist.
Antonin Artaud, Cinema and Reality
Introduction
Cinema may be considered aform of mass communication. Nevertheless, there is much more to this medium that makes it even more complex and interesting. If there is one word that has been associated with the motion picture since its inception, it would have to be entertainment. There are serious movies and edifying movies and movies that teach and promote ideologies or beliefs. But generally speaking, we go to the movies to be entertained. And it is that very capacity to effectively deliver entertainment – bypassing our critical faculties – that make movies so powerfully influential for better and for worse in ways that we may not even be aware...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bergman, I. (1960). The Magic Lantern. London: Hammandsworth.
Boring, E. (1916). Capacity to report upon moving pictures as conditioned by sex and age. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 6, 820–834.
Bower, B. (1987). Reel psychiatry. Science News, Sept. 19.
Bruno, G. (2009). Film, aesthetics, science: Hugo Münsterberg’s laboratory of moving images. Grey Room, 36, 89–113.
Campbell, D. (2003). Dario Argento’s Phenomenon (1958) apsychoanalytic perspective on the‘horror film’ genre and adolescent development. In Dana Birksted-Breen (Ed.), The Couch and the Silver Screen (p. 130). East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge.
Cowie, E. (2003). The cinematic dream – work of Ingmar Bergman’s wild strawberries 1957. In Dana Birksted-Breen (Ed.), The Couch and the Silver Screen (p. 182). East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge.
Eberwein, R.T. (1984). Film & the Dream Screen: ASleep and aForgetting (p. 42). Princeton University Press: Princeton.
Eisenstein, S.M. (1943). The Film Sense (p. 37). London: Faber. Trans.J. Leyda.
Kittleson, M. (1998). Soul of aPopular Culture: Looking At Contemporary Heroes, Myths, And Monsters (p. 169). Chicago: Open Court Press.
Kracauer, S. (1947). From Caligari to Hitler: APsychological History of the German Film. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Manvell, R. (1955). The Film and the Public (p. 23). London: Penguin Books.
Munsterberg, H. (1909). Psychotherapy (p. 125). London: Matfeld, Yard.
Munsterberg, H. (1916). The Photoplay: APsychological Study (p. 21). New York/London: D. Appleton.
Munsterberg, M. (1922). Hugo Munsterberger: His Life and His Work by His Daughter. New York: D. Appleton.
Richter, H. (1965). Hans Richter. Neuchatel: Editions du Griffon.
Rieber, R. (1997). Manufacturing Social Distress: Psychopathy in Everyday Life (pp.110–111). New York: Plenum Press.
Sklar, R. (1994). Movie-Made America: ACultural History of American Movies. New York: Vintage.
Talbot, M. (2009).Nightmare Scenario. The New Yorker, Nov. 16, pp.48–49.
von Hofscker, M. (1998). Richter’s films and the role of the radical artist, 1927–1941. In S.C. Foster (Ed.), Hans Richter/Activism, Modernism and the Avant-Garde. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rieber, R.W. (2012). Cultural Psychology and the Cinema. In: Rieber, R.W. (eds) Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_237
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_237
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0425-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0463-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science