Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories

2012 Edition
| Editors: Robert W. Rieber

Psychology of Religion, History of

  • Bernard Spilka
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_154

Introduction

Psychologists have always existed, though for most of history they were not known as such. Regarded primarily as philosophers, theologians, and writers, their interest was, in the broadest sense, the human condition. Over the centuries, their insights and understandings metamorphosed into psychology. Given the role of religion in history and society, a psychology of religion was inevitable. The last 200 years have thus witnessed the development of these disciplines. Still, turmoil pervades the latter field and its relationship to mainstream psychology. The following pages detail these issues.

Identifying the Psychology of Religion?

A number of problems plague this realm. For example, the psychology of religion cannot always be easily distinguished from anthropology and sociology. Some psychological historians fail to appreciate psychology’s relationship to religion. For example, Hilgard (1987) suggested an equivalence to the sociology of religion. Most authors of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aletti, M. (1992). The psychology of religion in Italy. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 171–189.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, G. W. (1967). William James: a biography. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  3. Allik, J. (2007). History of experimental psychology from an Estonian perspective. Psychological Research, 71, 618–625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ames, E. S. (1921). Review of the religious consciousness: a psychological study. American Journal of Psychology, 32, 442–445.Google Scholar
  5. Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1974). Psychology of religion 1880–1930: the rise and fall of a psychological movement. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 10, 84–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1989). Prolegomena to the psychological study of religion. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Belzen, J. A. (1994). Tremendum et fascinans. In J. A. Belzen (Ed.), Aspects in contexts: studies in the history of psychology of religion (pp. 91–127). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  8. Belzen, J. A. (2008). The development of early psychology of religion: a Dutch falsification of the received view. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 44, 258–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Belzen, J. A. (2009). Ideology, politics, and personality: Shaping forces in Dutch psychology of religion, 1907–1957. History of Psychology, 12, 157–182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro, J., Lafuente, E., & Jiminez, B. (2009). The soul of Spain: Spanish scholastic psychology and the making of modern subjectivity (1875–1931). History of Psychology, 12, 132–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, W. H. (1958). The psychology of religion. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Cummings, N., O’Donohue, W., & Cummings, J. (Eds.). (2009). Psychology’s war on religion. Phoenix, AZ: Zeig, Tucker & Thiesen.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1889). Psychology. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  14. Dittes, J. E. (1969). The psychology of religion. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 602–659). Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. Dunlap, K. (1920). Mysticism, freudianism and scientific psychology. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.Google Scholar
  16. Dunlap, K. (1946). Religion and its functions in human life. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Fay, J. W. (1939). American psychology before William James. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Pres.Google Scholar
  18. General Social Survey (2008). GSS cumulative datafile 1972–2006. http://sda.berkeley.edu/archive.htm. Retrieved 25 July.
  19. Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Psychology of religion. In The annual review of psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 201–221).Google Scholar
  20. Haeberlin, H. K. (1916). The theoretical foundations of Wundt’s Folk-psychology. Psychological Review, 23, 279–300.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, G. S. (1922). Senescence. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, G. S. (1923). Life and confessions of a psychologist. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  23. Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Psychology in America: a historical survey. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  24. Holm, N. (2004). Scandinavian Psychology of Religion: Past, Present and Future: A personal account. Psychology of Religion Newsletter, Division 36, American Psychological Association, 29(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  25. Hunter, R. J. (1990). Dictionary of pastoral care and counseling. Nashville: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
  26. James, W. (1890). Habit. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, P. E. (1959). Psychology of religion. Revised, New York: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  28. Josey, C. C. (1927). The psychology of religion. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (1990). Intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation: the boon or bane of contemporary psychology of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 442–462.Google Scholar
  30. Kugelmann, R. (2009). Out of the ghetto: integrating Catholics into mainstream psychology in the United States after World War II. History of Psychology, 12, 201–226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kugelmann, R., & Belzen, J. (2009). Historical intersections of psychology, religion and politics in national contexts. History of Psychology, 12, 125–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Leuba, J. H. (1912). A psychological study of religion. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Leuba, J. H. (1921). The psychological origin and the nature of religion. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  34. Leuba, J. H. (1933). God or man. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  35. Leuba, J. H. (1934). Religious beliefs of American scientists. Harper’s Magazine, 169, 291–300.Google Scholar
  36. McDargh, J. (1983). Psychoanalytic object relations theory and the study of religion. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  37. Meyer, E. (2009). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  38. Myers, G. E. (1986). William James: his life and thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. O’Connor, K. V. (1991). The psychology of religion in Australia. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 1, 41–57.Google Scholar
  40. Paloutzian, R. F., & Emmons, R. A. (2003). The psychology of religion. In S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schachter, & C. Sahn-Wexler (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 377–402).Google Scholar
  41. Pratt, J. B. (1908). The psychology of religion. Harvard Theological Review, 1, 435–454.Google Scholar
  42. Pruyser, P. (1968). A dynamic psychology of religion. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  43. Ragan, C., Malony, H. N., & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1980). Psychologists and religion: Professional factors and personal belief. Review of Religious Research, 21, 208–217.Google Scholar
  44. Richards, G. (2009). Goodwill in the valley of the shadow: Religion, psychotherapy, and politics in Britain from 1945 to the early 1960s. History of Psychology, 12, 183–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Richardson, R. D. (2006). William James: In the maelstrom of American modernism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  46. Roback, A. A. (1969). Pictorial history of psychology and psychiatry. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  47. Ross, D. (1972). Stanley Hall: The psychologist as prophet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schaub, E. L. (1922). The present status of the psychology of religion. The Journal of Religion, 2, 362–379.Google Scholar
  49. Schulz, D. P., & Schulz, S. E. (2000). A history of modern psychology. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  50. Starbuck, E. D. (1914). The psychology of religion (4th ed.). New York: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
  51. Strunk, O., Jr. (1958). The psychology of religion: an historical and contemporary survey. Psychological Newsletter, 9, 181–199.Google Scholar
  52. Thayer, H. S. (1983). The right to believe: William James’s reinterpretation of the function of religious belief. The Kenyon Review, V(1), 89–105.Google Scholar
  53. Vande Kemp, H. (1996). Historical perspective: religion and clinical psychology in America. In E. P. Shafranske (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 71–112). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  54. Vandermeersch, P. (1994). The failure of second naivete: some landmarks in the history of the French psychology of religion. In J. A. Belzen (Ed.), Aspects in contexts: studies in the history of psychology of religion (pp. 235–279). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  55. Wikstrom, O. (1993). The psychology of religion in Scandinavia. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 47–65.Google Scholar
  56. Wulff, D. M. (1985). Experimental introspection and religious experience: The Dorpat school of religious psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 21, 131–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wulff, D. (1997). Psychology of religion: classic and contemporary views (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Wulff, D. M. (2007). Empirical research on religion: perspectives from the psychology of religion. In H.-G. Heimbrock & C. P. C. Scholtz (Eds.), Religion: Immediate experience, and the mediacy of response (pp. 259–273). Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  59. Wundt, W. (1916). Elements of folk psychology. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DenverDenverUSA