Encyclopedia of Global Justice

2011 Edition
| Editors: Deen K. Chatterjee

Liberal Nationalism

  • Walter J. Riker
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_68

Nationalism is often associated with an unthinking devotion to one’s country and traditions that is dangerous to outsiders. It is often associated with the sort of deeply emotional commitment to one’s nation – over and against all others – that leads to atrocities like those committed by the National Socialists in Germany in the 1930s. This has led figures like John Dunn to call nationalism “the starkest political shame of the twentieth century, the deepest, most intractable and yet most unanticipated blot on the political history of the world since the year 1900” (1979: 57). That nationalism is inherently dangerous seems obvious to many, for in the words of Michael Ignatieff, “if a nation gives people a reason to sacrifice themselves, it also gives them a reason to kill” (1993: 247). To many, then, the idea of a “liberal nationalism” seems an oxymoron (Levinson 1995). Nationalism is necessarily conservative and violent; there is nothing “liberal” about it.

But liberal nationalists...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Barry B (1991) Democracy and power: essays in political theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Dunn J (1979) Western political theory in the face of the future. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Ignatieff M (1993) Blood and belonging: journeys into the new nationalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnston R, Banting K, Kymlicka W, Soroka S (2010) National identity and support for the welfare state. Can J Pol Sci 43:349–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Levinson S (1995) Is liberal nationalism an oxymoron? An essay for Judith Shklar. Ethics 105:626–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Margalit A, Raz J (1990) National self-determination. J Philos 87:439–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mayerfeld J (1998) The myth of benign group identity: a critique of liberal nationalism. Polity 30:555–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Miller D (1995) On nationality. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Rawls J (1999) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Scheffler S (2007) Immigration and the significance of culture. Philos Public Aff 35:93–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tamir Y (1993) Liberal nationalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Taylor C (1994) The politics of recognition. In: Gutmann A (ed) Multiculturalism: examining the politics of recognition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 25–74Google Scholar
  13. Waldron J (1995) Minority cultures and the cosmopolitan alternative. In: Kymlicka W (ed) The rights of minority cultures. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 93–122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter J. Riker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of West GeorgiaCarrolltonUSA