Encyclopedia of Global Justice

2011 Edition
| Editors: Deen K. Chatterjee

Language and Politics

  • Robert P. Abele
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_209

Two contemporary philosophers stand out as having spent significant time on the subjects of language and politics: Noam Chomsky and Jürgen Habermas. Both thinkers focus their social analyses on the structure of language and its place in normative theory, and on the issues of freedom, capitalism, state power, and Marxism. While both focus considerable attention on these same few topics, their understanding of each differs, at some points significantly.

Chomsky views linguistic structure as biologically innate in humans (2004a: 128), and this in large measure not only is presupposed in linguistic performance, but actually makes such performance possible (1965: 8–9). Chomsky makes this claim even more radical by adding to it that morality is innate in humans in the same manner as is language (2004a: 210). This includes the “instinct for freedom” humans possess (2005: 155).

Chomsky moves from here to assert a near-total rejection of an intrinsic connection between language and politics,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Archibugi D (1998) Principles of cosmopolitan democracy. In: Archibugi D, Held D, Koehler M (eds) Re-imagining political community: studies in cosmopolitan democracy. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 198–228Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of a theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Chomsky N (1967) The legitimacy of violence as a political act? Noam Chomsky debates with Hannah Arendt, Susan Sontag, et al. Downloadable from: www.chomky.info. Accessed 15 Dec 1967
  4. Chomsky N (2003) Radical priorities. AK Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  5. Chomsky N (2004) Language and politics, Otero CP (ed). AK Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  6. Chomsky N (2004) On terrorism: Noam Chomsky interviewed by John Bolender. Jump Arts J, January 2004Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky N (2005) Chomsky on anarchism. AK Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  8. Chomsky N (2006) Failed states. Metropolitan Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Habermas J (1971a) Knowledge and human interests. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Habermas J (1971b) Towards a rational society. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Habermas J (1975) Legitimation crisis. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Habermas J (1976) Communication and the evolution of society. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Habermas J (1987) Theory of communicative action, vols 1 & 2. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  14. Habermas J (1990a) Moral consciousness and communicative action. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Habermas J (1990b) The philosophical discourse of modernity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Habermas J (1998) Between facts and norms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Habermas J (2001) The postnational constellation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Held D (1980) Introduction to critical theory. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  19. McCarthy T (1978) The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Peck J (ed) (1987) The Chomsky reader. Pantheon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Rawls J (1999) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Walzer M (1983) Spheres of justice. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert P. Abele
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Humanities and PhilosophyDiablo Valley CollegePleasant HillUSA