Skip to main content
  • 40 Accesses

Generally, one could say that a model represents something different than itself. A model can be defined as “a mental construction that based on the reality, reproduces the main components and relationships of the analyzed segment of the reality.” Simply put, models serve as tools for understanding reality. These models should not be regarded as entirely realistic but as simplified versions of the reality to be explained and, thus, always in some sense selective. Such comprehension of models has been used in empirical science since Galileo and are seen as isomorphic representations of reality, because they are simpler than reality but emphasizing its main features or, at least, those most relevant to the object of research (Cavero 2004). However, similar to the fact that there is no consensus concerning the meaning of model, there is no consensus concerning the meaning of isomorphism. Zbigniew William Wolkowski says that isomorphism may be defined in three different ways: Firstly, as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,600.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cavero, M. J. (2004). A schematical view of the ontologies concept. ECOOP workshop: Philosophy, ontology and information systems. Leipzig: University Leipzig. www.ifonis.uni-Leipzig.de/Events/ECOOP/2004

  • Giere, G. N. (1999). Using models to represent reality. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Models-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 41–57). New York: Kluwer/Phenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. (1993). Religious explanation and scientific ideology. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runehov, A. L. C. (2007). Sacred or neural? The potential of neuroscience to explain religious experience. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolkowski, Z. W. (1993) The concept of coherence considered as a systems isomorphism. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 9(4), 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Runehov, A.L.C. (2013). Model. In: Runehov, A.L.C., Oviedo, L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_200297

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_200297

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8264-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8265-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics