Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions

2013 Edition
| Editors: Anne L. C. Runehov, Lluis Oviedo

Metaphysics, Darwinian

  • Momme von Sydow
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1567

Related Terms


“Darwinian metaphysics” may be seen as a compound of two antonyms, since Darwinism has often been treated as a scientific theory opposing religious and philosophical kinds of metaphysics. Correspondingly, the use of such term may appear provocative, almost as if one were using “Darwinian religion” to designate a general Darwinian approach. The approach and the term itself, therefore, are bound to elicit criticism from positivistic as well as metaphysical positions. Nevertheless, “Darwinian metaphysics” appears to be a suitable term for all historic or recent approaches claiming that Darwinian processes essentially offer a universal account of biology, culture, and our very being. Although Charles Darwin did indeed mainly concentrate on biology, he speculated that his theory would at least “give zest […] to whole metaphysics” (Notebook B, p. 228). Before we discuss Darwinian metaphysics in the narrow sense, based on a radicalization of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.Google Scholar
  2. Dawkins, R. (1983). Universal Darwinism. In D. S. Bendal (Ed.), Evolution from molecules to men (pp. 403–425). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gabora, L. (2005). Creative thought as a nonDarwinian evolutionary process. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(4), 65–87.Google Scholar
  4. Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hodgson, G. M. (2002). Darwinism in economics: From analogy to ontology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 259–281.Google Scholar
  6. Hull, D. L., Langman, R., & Glenn, S. (2001). A general account of selection: Biology, immunology and behavior. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 511–573.Google Scholar
  7. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. von Sydow, M. (2005). Charles Darwin: A Christian undermining Christianity? On self-undermining dynamics of ideas between belief and science. In D. M. Knight & M. D. Eddy (Eds.), Science and beliefs: From natural philosophy to natural science, 1700–1900 (pp. 141–156). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. von Sydow, M. (2012). From Darwinian metaphysics towards understanding the evolution of evolutionary mechanisms (2nd revised edition; orig. 2001: Sociobiology, Universal Darwinism and its Transcendence; University of Durham). Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.Google Scholar
  10. Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(4), 327–348.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversität HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany