Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions

2013 Edition
| Editors: Anne L. C. Runehov, Lluis Oviedo

Meaning, the Concept of

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1541

Related Terms

Description

The concept of (linguistic) meaning has attracted an enormous amount of attention in contemporary philosophy. In order to clarify this concept, philosophers have proposed so-called theories of meaning. Theories of meaning can be understood as explanatory accounts of what has been variously described as “how meaning arises,” “wherein meaning consists,” “how meaning is determined,” and suchlike. The value of a correct theory of meaning has, by some theorists, been taken to consist simply in its contribution to an understanding of the workings of human language, but has, by other theorists, also been taken to consist in its potential for clarifying important philosophical problems, for example, by providing a means for distinguishing between words and sentences that have real or genuine meaning and words and sentences that do not have real or genuine meaning but are, in effect,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Alston, W. P. (1987). Matching illocutionary act types. In J. J. Thomson (Ed.), On being and saying: Essays for Richard Cartwright (pp. 151–163). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1962). De Interpretatione/On interpretation (H. P. Cook, Trans.) (pp. 114–179). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York/London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, D. (1967). Meaning and truth. Synthese, 17(1), 304–323.Google Scholar
  6. Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Frege, G. (1918). Der Gedanke: Eine Logische Untersuchung. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus I, 1918–1919, 58–69.Google Scholar
  8. Grice, P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377–388.Google Scholar
  9. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Russell, B. (1918). The philosophy of logical atomism. The Monist, 28, 495–527.Google Scholar
  11. Schlick, M. (1936). Meaning and verification. The Philosophical Review, 45(4), 339–369.Google Scholar
  12. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada