Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions

2013 Edition
| Editors: Anne L. C. Runehov, Lluis Oviedo

Mediatic Societies, Theology in

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1451

Related Terms


“Theology in mediatic societies” is a rather recent field of enquiry which is interested in both today’s context in which theological thinking unfolds and how theology is done in this context. The increasing interest in this field expresses the growing awareness that theological language about God and about the relationship between God and his creation is (1) always already expressed in (linguistic) symbols and images and (2) it is always already shaped by the cultural context, that is, the culture, language, images, and symbols of a specific time and place. The people who do theology as well as those who practice religion are part of a specific culture and share in a common symbolic understanding which transforms over time. Thus, any serious theological thinking has to consider the sociocultural, political, and economic matrix in which it finds itself. Today, this matrix is increasingly shaped by media (Deacy and Ortiz 2008, p. 3; Marsh 2007...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Campbell, H. (2006). When Religion Meets New Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
  3. Deacy, C., & Ortiz, G. W. (2008). Theology and film. Challenging the sacred/secular divide. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Dirscherl, E. (2006). Grundriss theologischer anthropologie. Die Entschiedenheit des Menschen angesichts des Anderen. Regensburg: Pustet.Google Scholar
  5. Geraci, R. M. (2007). Cultural prestige. Popular science robotics as religion-science hybrid. In S. Knauss & A. D. Ornella (Eds.), Reconfigurations. Interdisciplinary perspectives on religion in a post-secular society (pp. 43–58). Vienna: LIT.Google Scholar
  6. Graham, E. (2002). Representations of the post/human: Monsters, aliens and others in popular culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Honnefelder, L. (1989). Wissenschaftliche Rationalität und Theologie. In L. Scheffczyk (Ed.), Rationalität. Ihre Entwicklung und ihre Grenzen (pp. 289–314). München: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  8. Hoover, S. (2006). Religion in the media age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Johnston, R. K. (2006). Reel spirituality. Theology and film in dialogue (2nd, revised and expanded edition). Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
  10. Knauss, S. (2008). Transcendental Bodies: Überlegungen zur Bedeutung des Körpers für filmische und religiöse Erfahrung. Regensburg: Pustet.Google Scholar
  11. Larcher, G. (2005). Annäherungsversuche von Kunst und Glaube: Ein fundamentaltheologisches Skizzenbuch. Vienna: LIT.Google Scholar
  12. Lyden, J. (2003). Film as religion. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lynch, G. (2005). Understanding theology and popular culture. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Marsh, C. (2007). Theology goes to the movies. An introduction to critical christian thinking. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Müller, K. (2008). Glauben – Fragen – Denken, Bd. II, Weisen der Weltvermittlung. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
  16. Mutschler, H.-D. (2005). Physik und religion. Perspektiven und Grenzen eines Dialogs. Darmstadt: WBG.Google Scholar
  17. Pace, E. (2011). Religion as communication. God’s Talk. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Pannenberg, W. (1977). Wissenschaftstheorie und Theologie. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  19. Schobert, W. (2006). Einführung in die theologische Anthropologie. Darmstadt: WBG.Google Scholar
  20. Roof, W. C. (1993). A generation of seekers. The spiritual journeys of the baby boom generation. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
  21. Roof, W. C. (1999). Spiritual marketplace. Baby boomers and the remaking of American religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Thomas, G. (1998). Medien. Ritual. Religion. Zur religiösen Funktion des Fernsehens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities/ReligionUniversity of HullHullUnited Kingdom