Encyclopedia of Entomology

2008 Edition
| Editors: John L. Capinera

Flower Strips as Ecological Compensation Areas for Pest Management

  • Cyrus Abivardi
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_3847

There are many practices designed to make agriculture more sustainable, reduce agrochemical use, and enhance biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems. Organic farming, crop rotation, small-scale fields, and maintenance of natural areas between agroecosystems are some examples. The latter, sometimes referred to as ecological compensation areas, consists of separate or interconnected fields that form buffer zones. Ecological compensation zones act as refuge areas and/or dispersal centers and offer many species adequate niches, compensating, at least partly, for the negative effects of agriculture.

A significant decrease in the use of fertilizers and pesticides occurred as a result of ecological compensation areas in Europe. For example, under integrated production or organic farming systems in Switzerland, farmers have to set aside at least 7% of their farmland as ecological compensation areas (e.g., meadows, hedgerows, traditional orchards, and wild flower strips).


This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Frank T (1998) Attractiveness of sown weed strips on hoverflies (Syrphidae, Diptera), butterflies (Rhopalocera, Lepidoptera), wild bees (Apoidea, Hymenoptera) and thread-waisted wasps (Sphecidae, Hymenoptera). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 71:11–20Google Scholar
  2. Frank T (1999) Density of adult hoverflies (Dipt., Syrphidae) in sown weed strips and adjacent fields. J Appl Entomol 123:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Friedli J, Frank T (1998) Reduced applications of metaldehyde pellets for reliable control of the slug pests Arion lusitanicus and Deroceras reticulatum in oilseed rape adjacent to sown wildflower strips. J Appl Ecol 35:504–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Letourneau DK (1998) Conservation biology: lessons for conserving natural enemies. In: Barbosa P (ed) Conservation biological control. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 9–38, 133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Marshall EJP, Moonen C, Cooper A (1997) Patterns of plant colonisation in extended field margin strips and their implications for nature conservation. In: Species dispersal and land use processes. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual IALE (UK) Conference, Ulster, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, 9–11 September 1997. IALE (UK), Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, pp 221–228Google Scholar
  6. Nentwig W, Frank T, Lethmayer C (1998) Sown weed strips: artificial ecological compensation areas as an important tool in conservation biological control. In: Barbosa P (ed) Conservation biological control. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wingeier T (1992) Economic impact of weed strips sown into fields. Agrarokologie 2:1–97 (in German)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cyrus Abivardi
    • 1
  1. 1.Swiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZurichSwitzerland