Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism

2007 Edition
| Editors: David Gubbins, Emilio Herrero-Bervera

Magnetization, Remanent, Fold Test

  • Jaime Urrutia‐Fucugauchi
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_197
Establishing the age of the remanence acquisition with respect to the origin of the rock unit or age of structural deformation events is critical in the interpretation of paleomagnetic data. It is also important to establish that the magnetic minerals carry a stable magnetization over geological timescales. These two related questions remain difficult problems, which often affect the application of paleomagnetism to tectonic, stratigraphic, and paleogeographic problems (Cox and Doell, 1960; Irving, 1964). It is therefore not surprising that early in the development of the paleomagnetic method, several field and laboratory tests were developed and applied to a range of geological contexts. Among them, an elegant simple answer was put forward to constrain the age of remanence acquisition by using field information by Graham ( 1949). He realized that in folded rocks a simple test based on rotation of the magnetization directions about the local strike could determine if the remanence was...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Bazhenov, M.L., and Shipunov, S.V., 1991. Fold test in paleomagnetism: new approaches and reappraisal of data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 104: 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chan, L.S., 1988. Apparent tectonic rotations, declination anomaly equations, and declination anomaly charts. Journal of Geophysical Research, 93: 12 151–12 158.Google Scholar
  3. Cogné, J.P., and Perroud, H., 1985. Strain removal applied to paleomagnetic directions in an orogenic belt; the Permian red slates of the Alpes Maritimes, France. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 72: 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox, A., and Doell, R.R., 1960. Review of paleomagnetism. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 71: 647–768.Google Scholar
  5. Facer, R.A., 1983. Folding, Graham's fold tests in paleomagnetic investigations. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 72: 165–171.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, N.I., and Hall, P., 1990. New statistical methods for directional data—I. Bootstrap comparison of mean directions and the fold test in paleomagnetism. Geophysical Journal International, 101: 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher, R.A., 1953. Dispersion on a sphere. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 217: 295–305.Google Scholar
  8. French, A.N., and Van der Voo, R., 1979. The magnetization of the Rose Hill Formation at the classic site of Graham’s fold test. Journal of Geophysical Research, 48: 7688–7696.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, J.W., 1949. The stability and significance of magnetism in sedimentary rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 54: 131–167.Google Scholar
  10. Irving, E., 1964. Paleomagnetism and Its Application to Geological and Geophysical Problems. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Kodama, K.P., 1988. Remanence rotation due to rock strain during folding and the stepwise application of the fold test. Journal of Geophysical Research, 93: 3357–3371.Google Scholar
  12. MacDonald, W.D., 1980. Net rotation, apparent tectonic rotation, and the structural tilt correction in paleomagnetic studies. Journal of Geophysical Research, 85: 3659–3669.Google Scholar
  13. McElhinny, M.W., 1964. Statistical significance of the fold test in palaeomagnetism. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 8: 338–340.Google Scholar
  14. McElhinny, M.W., 1973. Paleomagnetism and Plate Tectonics. Cambridge Earth Science Series, Cambridge University Press, 358 pp.Google Scholar
  15. McFadden, P.L., 1990. A new fold test for paleomagnetic studies. Geophysical Journal International, 103: 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McFadden, P.L., 1998. The fold test as an analytical tool. Geophysical Journal International, 135: 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McFadden, P.L., and Jones, D.L., 1981. The fold test in paleomagnetism. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 67: 53–58.Google Scholar
  18. Stamatakos, J., and Kodama, K.P., 1991a. Flexural flow folding and the paleomagnetic fold test: an example of strain reorientation of remanence in the Mauch Chunk Formation. Tectonics, 10: 807–819.Google Scholar
  19. Stamatakos, J., and Kodama, K.P., 1991b. The effects of grain‐scale deformation on the Bloomsburg Formation pole. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96: 17 919–17 933.Google Scholar
  20. Stewart, S., 1995. Paleomagnetic analysis of plunging fold structures: errors and a simple fold test. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 130: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tauxe, L., and Watson, G.S., 1994. The fold test: an eigen analysis approach. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 122: 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tauxe, L., Kylstra, N., and Constable, C., 1991. Bootstrap statistics for paleomagnetic data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96: 11 723–11 740.Google Scholar
  23. Van der Plujim, B.A., 1987. Grain‐scale deformation and fold test‐evaluation of syn‐folding remagnetization. Geophysical Research Letters, 14: 155–157.Google Scholar
  24. Watson, G.S., and Enkin, R.J., 1993. The fold test in paleomagnetism as a parameter estimation problem. Geophysical Research Letters, 20: 2135–2137.Google Scholar
  25. Weil, A.B., and Van der R., Voo, 2002. The evolution of the paleomagnetic fold test as applied to complex geologic situations, illustrated by a case study from northern Spain. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 27: 1223–1235.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaime Urrutia‐Fucugauchi

There are no affiliations available